AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER
Dec 102013
 


Sofosbuvir

Sovaldi

M.Wt: 529.45

Formula: C22H29FN3O9P

Isopropyl (2S)-2-[[[(2R,3R,4R,5R)-5-(2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)-4-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-tetrahydrofuran-2-yl]methoxy-phenoxy-phosphoryl]amino]propanoate

A prodrug of 2′-deoxy-2′-alpha-F-2′-beta-C-methyluridine 5′-monophosphate.
GS-7977, PSI-7977

  • GS 7977
  • GS-7977
  • PSI 7977
  • PSI-7977
  • Sofosbuvir
  • Sovaldi
  • UNII-WJ6CA3ZU8B

CAS Registry Number :1190307 -88-0

http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/usan/sofosbuvir.pdf

Indications: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV GT1, GT2, GT3, GT4)
Mechanism: nucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor
approved Time: December 6, 2013
,U.S. Patent Number: 7964580,8415322,8334270,7429572;, patent validity: March 26, 2029 (U.S. Patent No.: 7,964,580 and 8,334,270), April 3, 2025 (U.S. Patent No.: 7,429,572 and 8,415,322)

US patent number 7964580, US patent number 8415322, US patent number 8334270,US patent number 7429572 Patent Expiration Date: March 26, 2029 for US patent number 7964580 and 8334270 (2028 in EU); April 3, 2025 for US patent number 7429572 and 8415322

Sales value (estimated): $ 1.9 billion (2014), 6600000000 USD (2016)

Drug Companies: Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead Sciences)

WASHINGTON, Dec. 6, 2013 (AP) — Federal health officials have approved a highly anticipated hepatitis C drug from Gilead Sciences Inc. that is expected to offer a faster, more palatable cure to millions of people infected with the liver-destroying virus.

The Food and Drug Administration said Friday it approved the pill Sovaldi in combination with older drugs to treat the main forms of hepatitis C that affect U.S. patients.

Current treatments for hepatitis C can take up to a year of therapy and involve weekly injections of a drug that causes flu-like side effects. That approach only cures about three out of four patients. Sovaldi is a daily pill that in clinical trials cured roughly 90 percent of patients in just 12 weeks, when combined with the older drug cocktail.http://www.pharmalive.com/us-approves-breakthrough-hepatitis-c-drug

 

  • The end of October 2013 saw a nod from the FDA given to Gilead’s New Drug Application for Sofosbuvir, a much needed treatment for hepatitis C.
  • As a nucleotide analogue, Sofosbuvir is designed as a once daily treatment.
  • There are roughly 170 million cases of hepatitis C around the world.
  • A report in the Journal of the American Medical Association on August 28, 2013 revealed that the Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin combination treatment effectively cured many patients with the Hepatitis C Virus.
  • The Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin drug combination was void of interferon-based treatments, which  many patients are resistant too.
  • More than 3 million Americans have chronic Hepatitis C Virus, and 22 percent of these patients are African American.

Sofosbuvir (brand names Sovaldi and Virunon) is a drug used for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, with a high cure rate.[1][2] It inhibits the RNA polymerase that the hepatitis C virus uses to replicate its RNA. It was discovered at Pharmasset and developed by Gilead Sciences.[3]

Sofosbuvir is a component of the first all-oral, interferon-free regimen approved for treating chronic Hepatitis C.[4]

In 2013, the FDA approved sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin (RBV) for oral dual therapy of HCV genotypes 2 and 3, and for triple therapy with injected pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and RBV for treatment-naive patients with HCV genotypes 1 and 4.[4] Sofosbuvir treatment regimens last 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 2 and 4, compared to 24 weeks for treatment of genotype 3. The label furhter states that sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin may be considered for patients infected with genotype 1 who are interferon-ineligible.[5] Sofosbuvir will cost $84,000 for 12 weeks of treatment and $168,000 for the 24 weeks, which some patient advocates have criticized as unaffordable.

Interferon-free therapy for treatment of hepatitis C eliminates the substantial side-effects associated with use of interferon. Up to half of hepatitis C patients cannot tolerate the use of interferon.[6]

 

Sofosbuvir is a prodrug that is metabolized to the active antiviral agent 2′-deoxy-2′-α-fluoro-β-C-methyluridine-5′-triphosphate.[7] Sofosbuvir is anucleotide analog inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase.[8] The HCV polymerase or NS5B protein is a RNA-dependent RNA polymerase critical for the viral cycle.

The New Drug Application for Sofosbuvir was submitted on April 8, 2013 and received the FDA’s Breakthrough Therapy Designation, which grants priority review status to drug candidates that may offer major treatment advantages over existing options.[9]

On 6th December 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved sofosbuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.[10]

Sofosbuvir is being studied in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, with ribavirin alone, and with other direct-acting antiviral agents.[11][12] It has shown clinical efficacy when used either with pegylated interferon/ribavirin or in interferon-free combinations. In particular, combinations of sofosbuvir with NS5A inhibitors, such as daclatasvir or GS-5885, have shown sustained virological response rates of up to 100% in people infected with HCV.[13]

Data from the ELECTRON trial showed that a dual interferon-free regimen of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin produced a 24-week post-treatment sustained virological response (SVR24) rate of 100% for previously untreated patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3.[14][15]

Data presented at the 20th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in March 2013 showed that a triple regimen of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and ribavirin produced a 12-week post-treatment sustained virological response (SVR12) rate of 100% for both treatment-naive patients and prior non-responders with HCV genotype 1.[16] Gilead has developed a sofosbuvir + ledipasvir coformulation that is being tested with and without ribavirin.

Sofosbuvir will cost $84,000 for 12 weeks of treatment used for genotype 1 and 2, and $168,000 for the 24 weeks used for genotype 3.[17] This represents a substantial pricing increase from previous treatments consisting of interferon and ribavirin, which cost between $15,000 and $20,000.[18] The price is also significantly higher than that of Johnson & Johnson‘s recently approved drug simeprevir (Olysio), which costs $50,000 and also treats chronic hepatitis C.[18] The high cost of the drug has resulted in a push back from insurance companies and the like, includingExpress Scripts, which has threatened to substitute lower priced competitors, even if those therapies come with a more unfriendly dosing schedule.[18] Other treatments that have recently entered the market have not matched the efficacy of sofosbuvir, however, allowing Gilead to set a higher price until additional competition enters the market.[18] Patient advocates such as Doctors Without Borders have complained about the price, which is particularly difficult for underdeveloped countries to afford.[19]

ChemSpider 2D Image | Sofosbuvir | C22H29FN3O9P

sofosbuvir

  1.  News: United States to approve potent oral drugs for hepatitis C, Sara Reardon, Nature, 30 October 2013
  2.  Sofia MJ, Bao D, Chang W, Du J, Nagarathnam D, Rachakonda S, Reddy PG, Ross BS, Wang P, Zhang HR, Bansal S, Espiritu C, Keilman M, Lam AM, Steuer HM, Niu C, Otto MJ, Furman PA (October 2010). “Discovery of a β-d-2′-deoxy-2′-α-fluoro-2′-β-C-methyluridine nucleotide prodrug (PSI-7977) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus”. J. Med. Chem. 53 (19): 7202–18.doi:10.1021/jm100863xPMID 20845908.
  3.  “PSI-7977”. Gilead Sciences.
  4. Tucker M (December 6, 2013). “FDA Approves ‘Game Changer’ Hepatitis C Drug Sofosbuvir”. Medscape.
  5.  “U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves Gilead’s Sovaldi™ (Sofosbuvir) for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C – See more at: http://www.gilead.com/news/press-releases/2013/12/us-food-and-drug-administration-approves-gileads-sovaldi-sofosbuvir-for-the-treatment-of-chronic-hepatitis-c#sthash.T9uTbSWK.dpuf”. Gilead. December 6, 2013.
  6.  “Sofosbuvir is safer than interferon for hepatitis C patients, say scientists”. News Medical. April 25, 2013.
  7.  Murakami E, Tolstykh T, Bao H, Niu C, Steuer HM, Bao D, Chang W, Espiritu C, Bansal S, Lam AM, Otto MJ, Sofia MJ, Furman PA (November 2010). “Mechanism of activation of PSI-7851 and its diastereoisomer PSI-7977”J. Biol. Chem. 285 (45): 34337–47.doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.161802PMC 2966047PMID 20801890.
  8.  Alejandro Soza (November 11, 2012). “Sofosbuvir”. Hepaton.
  9.  “FDA Advisory Committee Supports Approval of Gilead’s Sofosbuvir for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection”Drugs.com. October 25, 2013.
  10.  “FDA approves Sovaldi for chronic hepatitis C”FDA New Release. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2013-12-06.
  11.  Murphy T (November 21, 2011). “Gilead Sciences to buy Pharmasset for $11 billion”.Bloomberg Businessweek.
  12.  Asselah T (January 2014). “Sofosbuvir for the treatment of hepatitis C virus”. Expert Opin Pharmacother 15 (1): 121–30. doi:10.1517/14656566.2014.857656PMID 24289735.
  13.  “AASLD 2012: Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir dual regimen cures most people with HCV genotypes 1, 2, or 3”News. European Liver Patients Association. 2012-11-21.
  14.  AASLD: PSI-7977 plus Ribavirin Can Cure Hepatitis C in 12 Weeks without Interferon. Highleyman, L. HIVandHepatitis.com. 8 November 2011.
  15.  Gane EJ, Stedman CA, Hyland RH, Ding X, Svarovskaia E, Symonds WT, Hindes RG, Berrey MM (January 2013). “Nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for hepatitis C”.N. Engl. J. Med. 368 (1): 34–44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1208953PMID 23281974.
  16.  CROI 2013: Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir + Ribavirin Combo for HCV Produces 100% Sustained Response. Highleyman, L. HIVandHepatitis.com. 4 March 2013.
  17.  Campbell T (December 11, 2013). “Gilead’s Sofosbuvir Gets New Name, Price, Headaches”. The Motley Fool.
  18.  Cohen, J. (2013). “Advocates Protest the Cost of a Hepatitis C Cure”. Science 342 (6164): 1302–1303. doi:10.1126/science.342.6164.1302PMID 24337268edit

The chemical structure 

Chemical Structure of Sovaldi_Sofosbuvir_Hepatatis C-Gilead

GS-7977, (S)-isopropyl 2-(((S)-(((2R,3R,4R,5R)-5-(2,4-dioxo-3,4- dihydropyrimidin^l(2H)-yl)-4-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methyltetrahydrofuran-2- yl)methoxy)(phenoxy)phosphoryl)amino)propanoate, available from Gilead Sciences, Inc., is described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 7,964,580. (See also US 2010/0016251, US 2010/0298257, US 201 1/0251 152 and US 2012/0107278.) GS-7977 has the structure:

 

Figure imgf000013_0001

GS-7977 can be crystalline or amorphous. Examples of preparing crystalline and amorphous forms of GS-7977 are disclosed in US 2010/0298257 (US 12/783,680) and US 201 1/0251 152 (US 13/076,552),

 

 

 

Chemical Synthesis of Sofosbuvir_Sovaldi_GS-7977_PSI-7977_Hepatitis C_Gilead

 

Commerically available isopropylidine protected D-glyceraldehyde was reacted with (carbethoxyethylidene)triphenylmethylphosphorane gave the chiral pentenoate ester YP-1. Permanganate dihydroxylation of YP-1 in acetone gave the D-isomer diol YP-2. The cyclic sulfate YP-3 was obtained by first making the cyclic sulfite with thionyl chloride and then oxidizing to cyclic sulfate with sodium hypochlorite. Fluorination of YP-3 with triethylamine-trihydrofluoride(TEA-3HF) in the presence of triethylamine, followed by the hydrolysis of sulfate ester in the presence of concentrated HCl provided diol YP-4 which was benzoylated to give ribonolactone YP-5. Reduction of YP-5 with Red-Al followed by chlorination with sulfuryl chloride in the presence of catalytic amount of tetrabutylammonium bromide yielded YP-6. The conversion of YP-6 to benzoyl protected 2′-deoxyl-2′-alpha-F-2′-Beta-C-methylcytidine (YP-7) was achieved by using O-trimethyl silyl-N4-benzoylcytosine and stannic chloride. Preparation of the uridine nucleoside YP-8 was accomplished by first heating benzoyl cytidine YP-7 in acetic acid then treating with methoanolic ammonia to provide YP-8 in 78% yield.

The phosphoramidating reagent YP-9 was obtained by first reacting phenyldichlorophosphate with L-Alanine isopropyl ester hydrochloride and then with pentafluorophenol. Isolation of single Sp diastereomer YP-9 was achieved via crystallization-induced dynamic resolution in the presence of 20% MTBE/hexane at room temperature.

The uridine nucleoside YP-8 was treated with tert-butylmagnesium chloride in dry THF, followed by pentafluorophenyl Sp diastereomer YP-9 to furnish the Isopropyl (2S)-2-[[[(2R,3R,4R,5R)-5-(2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)-4-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-tetrahydrofuran-2-yl]methoxy-phenoxy-phosphoryl]amino]propanoate (Sovaldi, sofosbuvir, GS-7977, PSI-7977)。

…………

US 7429572

US  8415322

US 7964580

US 8334270B

 

WO 2006012440

WO 2011123668

US8334270

/US20080139802

……………………………………………

In US 20050009737 published Jan. 13, 2005, J. Clark discloses fluoro-nucleoside derivatives that inhibit Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase. In particular, 4-amino-1-((2R,3R,4R,5R)-3-fluoro-4-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-tetrahydro-faran-2-yl)-1H-pyrimidin-2-one (18) was a particularly potent inhibitor of HCV polymerase as well as the polymerase of other Flaviviridae.

 

Figure US20080139802A1-20080612-C00002

 

In WO2006/012440 published Feb. 2, 2006, P. Wang et al disclose processes for the preparation of 18. Introduction of the cytosine is carried out utilizing the Vorbruggen protocol. In US 20060122146 published Jun. 8, 2006, B.-K. Chun et al. disclose and improved procedures for the preparation of the 2-methyl-2-fluoro-lactone 10. In the latter disclosure the nucleobase is glycosylated by reacting with ribofuranosyl acetate which is prepared by reduction of 10 with LiAlH(O-tert-Bu)followed by acetylaton of the intermediate lactol which was treated with an O-trimethylsilyl N4-benzoylcytosine in the presence of SnClto afford the O,O,N-tribenzoylated nucleoside.

……………………………………………………………….

http://www.google.nl/patents/US20080139802

The present process as described in SCHEME A and the following examples contain numerous improvements which have resulted in higher yields of the desired nucleoside. The asymmetric hydroxylation of 22 was discovered to be best carried out with sodium permanganate in the presence of ethylene glycol, sodium bicarbonate in acetone which afforded the diol in 60-64% on pilot plant scale. The sodium permanganate procedure avoids introduction of osmium into the process stream. Further more the stereospecific hydroxylation can be accomplished without using an expensive chiral ligand. The requisite olefin is prepared from (1S,2S)-1,2-bis-((R)-2,2-dimethyl-[1,3]dioxolan-4-yl)-ethane-1,2-diol (20) (C. R. Schmid and J. D. Bryant, Org. Syn. 1995 72:6-13) by oxidative cleavage of the diol and treating the resulting aldehyde with 2-(triphenyl-λ5-phosphanylidene)-propionic acid ethyl ester to afford 22.

 

Figure US20080139802A1-20080612-C00005

 

(i) NaIO4, NaHCO3, DCM; (ii) MeC(═PPh3)CO2Et; (iii) acetone-NaMnO(aq), ethylene glycol, NaHCO3, −10 to 0° C.; aq. NaHSO(quench); (iv) i-PrOAc, MeCN, TEA, SOCl2; (v) i-PrOAc, MeCN, NaOCl; (vi) TEA-3HF, TEA; (vii) HCl (aq)-BaCl2-aq; (viii) (PhCO)2O, DMAP, MeCN, (ix) RED-AL/TFE (1:1), DCM; (x) SO2Cl2-TBAB, DCM; (xi) 32, SnCl4-PhCl; (xii) MeOH-MeONa

EXAMPLE 3 (2S,3R)-3-[(4R)-2,2-dimethyl-[1,3]dioxolan-4-yl]-2,3-dihydroxy-2-methyl-propionic acid ethyl ester (24)

 

Figure US20080139802A1-20080612-C00008

 

A suspension of 22 (10 kg, CAS Reg. No. 81997-76-4), ethylene glycol (11.6 kg), solid NaHCO(11.8 kg) and acetone (150 L) is cooled to ca.-15° C. A solution of 36% aqueous NaMnO(19.5 kg) is charged slowly (over 4 h) to the suspension maintaining reaction temperature at or below −10° C. After stirring for 0.5 h at −10° C., an aliquot of the reaction mixture (ca. 5 mL) is quenched with 25% aqueous sodium bisulfite (ca. 15 mL). A portion of resulting slurry is filtered and submitted for GC analysis to check the progress of the reaction. When the reaction is complete, the reaction mixture is quenched by slow addition (over 40 min) of cooled (ca. 0° C.) 25% aqueous NaHSO(60 L). The temperature of the reaction mixture is allowed to reach 4° C. during the quench. CELITE® (ca. 2.5 kg) is then slurried in acetone (8 kg) and added to the dark brown reaction mixture. The resulting slurry is aged at RT to obtain light tan slurry. The slurry is filtered, and the filter cake is washed with acetone (3×39 kg). The combined filtrate is concentrated by vacuum distillation (vacuum approximately 24 inches of Hg; max pot temperature is 32° C.) to remove the acetone. The aqueous concentrate is extracted with EtOAc (3×27 kg), and the combined organic extracts were washed with water (25 L). The organic phase is then concentrated by atmospheric distillation and EtOAc is replaced with toluene. The volume of the batch is adjusted to ca. 20 L. Heptane (62 kg) is added and the batch cooled to ca. 27° C. to initiate crystallization. The batch is then cooled to −10° C. After aging overnight at −10° C., the product is filtered, washed with 10% toluene in heptane and dried at 50° C. under vacuum to afford 6.91 kg (59.5%) of 24 (CARN 81997-76-4) as a white crystalline solid.

EXAMPLE 4 (3R,4R,5R)-3-Fluoro-4-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-dihydro-furan-2-one (10)

 

Figure US20080139802A1-20080612-C00009

 

steps 1 & 2—A dry, clean vessel was charged with 24 (6.0 kg), isopropyl acetate (28.0 kg), MeCN (3.8 kg) and TEA (5.4 kg). The mixture was cooled to 5-10° C., and thionyl chloride (3.2 kg) was added slowly while cooling the solution to maintain the temperature below 20° C. The mixture was stirred until no starting material was left (GC analysis). The reaction was typically complete within 30 min after addition is complete. To the mixture was added water (9 kg) and after stirring, the mixture was allowed to settle. The aqueous phase was discarded and the organic phase was washed with a mixture of water (8 kg) and saturated NaHCO(4 kg) solution. To the remaining organic phase containing 36 was added MeCN (2.5 kg) and solid NaHCO(3.1 kg). The resulting slurry was cooled to ca. 10° C. Bleach (NaOCl solution, 6.89 wt % aqueous solution, 52.4 kg, 2 eq.) was added slowly while cooling to maintain temperature below 25° C. The mixture was aged with stirring over 90-120 min at 20-25° C., until the reaction was complete (GC analysis). After completion of the reaction, the mixture was cooled to ca. 10° C. and then quenched with aqueous Na2SOsolution (15.1% w/w, 21 kg) while cooling to maintain temperature below 20° C. The quenched reaction mixture was filtered through a cartridge filter to remove inorganic solids. The filtrate was allowed to settle, and phases are separated and the aqueous phase is discarded. The organic layer was washed first with a mixture of water (11 kg) and saturated NaHCOsolution (4.7 kg), then with of saturated NaHCOsolution (5.1 kg). DIPEA (220 mL) was added to the organic phase and the resulting solution was filtered through CELITE® (bag filter) into a clean drum. The reactor was rinsed with isopropyl acetate (7 kg) and the rinse is transferred to the drum. The organic phase was then concentrated under vacuum (25-28 inches of Hg) while maintaining reactor jacket temperature at 45-50° C. to afford 26 as an oil (˜10 L). Additional DIPEA (280 mL) was added and the vacuum distillation was continued (jacket temperature 50-55° C.) until no more distillate was collected. (batch volume ca. 7 L).

step 3—To the concentrated oil from step 2 containing 26 was added TEA (2.34 kg) and TEA-trihydrofluoride (1.63 kg). The mixture was heated to 85° C. for 2 h. The batch was sampled to monitor the progress of the reaction by GC. After the reaction was complete conc. HCl (2.35 kg) was added to the mixture and the resulting mixture heated to ca. 90° C. (small amount of distillate collected). The reaction mixture was stirred at ca. 90° C. for 30 min and then saturated aqueous BaCl2solution (18.8 kg) was added. The resulting suspension was stirred at about 90° C. for 4 h. The resulting mixture was then azeotropically dried under a vacuum (9-10 inches of Hg) by adding slowly n-propanol (119 kg) while distilling off the azeotropic mixture (internal batch temperature ca. 85-90° C.). To the residual suspension was added toluene (33 kg) and vacuum distillation was continued to distill off residual n-propanol (and traces of water) to a minimum volume to afford 28.

step 4—To the residue from step 3 containing 28 was added MeCN (35 kg) and ca. 15 L was distilled out under atmospheric pressure. The reaction mixture was cooled to ca. 10° C. and then benzoyl chloride (8.27 kg) and DMAP (0.14 kg) are added. TEA (5.84 kg) was added slowly to the reaction mixture while cooling to maintain temperature below 40° C. The batch was aged at ca. 20° C. and the progress of the benzoylation is monitored by HPLC. After completion of the reaction, EtOAc (30 kg) was added to the mixture and the resulting suspension is stirred for about 30 min. The reaction mixture was filtered through a CELITE® pad (using a nutsche filter) to remove inorganic salts. The solid cake was washed with EtOAc (38 kg). The combined filtrate and washes were washed successively with water (38 kg), saturated NaHCOsolution (40 kg) and saturated brine (44 kg). The organic phase was polish-filtered (through a cartridge filter) and concentrated under modest vacuum to minimum volume. IPA (77 kg) was added to the concentrate and ca. 25 L of distillate was collected under modest vacuum allowing the internal batch temperature to reach ca. 75° C. at the end of the distillation. The remaining solution was then cooled to ca. 5° C. over 5 h and optionally aged overnight. The precipitate was filtered and washed with of cold (ca. 5° C.) IPA (24 kg). The product was dried under vacuum at 60-70° C. to afford 6.63 kg (70.7% theory of 10 which was 98.2% pure by HPLC.

EXAMPLE 1 Benzoic acid 3-benzoyloxy-5-(4-benzoylamino-2-oxo-2H-pyrimidin-1-yl)-4-fluoro-4-methyl-tetrahydro-furan-2-ylmethyl ester (14)

 

Figure US20080139802A1-20080612-C00006

 

Trifluoroethanol (4.08 kg) is added slowly to a cold solution (−15° C.) of RED-AL® solution (12.53 kg) and toluene (21.3 kg) while maintaining the reaction temperature at or below −10° C. After warming up to RT (ca. 20° C.), the modified RED-AL reagent mixture (30.1 kg out of the 37.6 kg prepared) is added slowly to a pre-cooled solution (−15° C.) of fluorolactone dibenzoate 10 (10 kg) in DCM (94.7 kg) while maintaining reaction temperature at or below −10° C. After reduction of the lactone (monitored by in-process HPLC), a catalytic amount of tetrabutylammonium bromide (90 g) is added to the reaction mixture. Sulfiiryl chloride (11.86 kg) is then added while maintaining reaction temperature at or below 0° C. The reaction mixture is then heated to 40° C. until formation of the chloride is complete (ca. 4 h) or warmed to RT (20-25° C.) and stirred over night (ca. 16 h). The reaction mixture is cooled to about 0° C., and water (100 L) is added cautiously while maintaining reaction temperature at or below 15° C. The reaction mixture is then stirred at RT for ca. 1 h to ensure hydrolytic decomposition of excess sulfuryl chloride and the phases are separated. The organic layer is washed with a dilute solution of citric acid (prepared by dissolving 15.5 kg of citric acid in 85 L of water) and then with dilute KOH solution (prepared by dissolving 15 kg of 50% KOH in 100 L of water). The organic phase is then concentrated and solvents are replaced with chlorobenzene (2×150 kg) via atmospheric replacement distillation. The resulting solution containing 30 is dried azeotropically.

A suspension of N-benzoyl cytosine (8.85 kg), ammonium sulfate (0.07 kg) and hexamethyldisilazane (6.6 kg) in chlorobenzene (52.4 kg) is heated to reflux (ca. 135° C.) and stirred (ca. 1 h) until the mixture becomes a clear solution. The reaction mixture is then concentrated in vacuo to obtain 32 as a syrupy liquid. The anhydrous solution of 30 in chlorobenzene (as prepared) and stannic chloride (28.2 kg) is added to this concentrate. The reaction mixture is maintained at about 70° C. until the desired coupling reaction is complete (ca. 10 h) as determined by in-process HPLC. Upon completion, the reaction mixture is cooled to RT and diluted with DCM (121 kg). This solution is added to a suspension of solid NaHCO(47 kg) and CELITE® (9.4 kg) in DCM (100.6 kg). The resulting slurry is cooled to 10-15° C., and water (8.4 kg) is added slowly to quench the reaction mixture. The resulting suspension is very slowly (caution: gas evolution) heated to reflux (ca. 45° C.) and maintained for about 30 min. The slurry is then cooled to ca. 15° C. and filtered. The filter cake is repeatedly reslurried in DCM (4×100 L) and filtered. The combined filtrate is concentrated under atmospheric pressure (the distillate collected in the process is used for reslurrying the filter cake) until the batch temperature rises to about 90° C. and then allowed to cool slowly to about −5° C. The resulting slurry is aged for at least 2 h at −5° C. The precipitated product is filtered and washed with IPA (30 kg+20 kg), and oven-dried in vacuo at about 70° C. to afford 8.8 kg (57.3%) of 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-2-methyl-3-5-O-dibenzoyl-β-D-ribofuranosyl)-N-4-benzoylcytosine (14, CAS Reg No. 817204-32-3) which was 99.3% pure.

EXAMPLE 2 4-Amino-1-(3-fluoro-4-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-tetrahydro-furan-2-yl)-1H-pyrimidin-2-one (18)

 

Figure US20080139802A1-20080612-C00007

 

A slurry of 14 (14.7 kg) in MeOH (92.6 kg) is treated with catalytic amounts of methanolic sodium methoxide (0.275 kg). The reaction mixture is heated to ca. 50° C. and aged (ca. 1 h) until the hydrolysis is complete. The reaction mixture is quenched by addition of isobutyric acid (0.115 kg). The resulting solution is concentrated under moderate vacuum and then residual solvents are replaced with IPA (80 kg). The batch is distilled to a volume of ca. 50 L. The resulting slurry is heated to ca. 80° C. and then cooled slowly to ca. 5° C. and aged (ca. 2 h). The precipitated product is isolated by filtration, washed with IPA (16.8 kg) and dried in an oven at 70° C. in vacuo to afford 6.26 kg (88.9%) of 18 which assayed at 99.43% pure.

 

………………………………………………………………………

https://www.google.com/patents/US8334270

EXAMPLE 4 Preparation of 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-C-methyluridine

 

 

2′-Deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-C-methylcytidine (1.0 g, 1 eq) (Clark, J., et al., J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48, 5504-5508) was dissolved in 10 ml of anhydrous pyridine and concentrated to dryness in vacuo. The resulting syrup was dissolved in 20 ml of anhydrous pyridine under nitrogen and cooled to 0° C. with stirring. The brown solution was treated with benzoyl chloride (1.63 g, 3 eq) dropwise over 10 min. The ice bath was removed and stirring continued for 1.5 h whereby thin-layer chromatography (TLC) showed no remaining starting material. The mixture was quenched by addition of water (0.5 ml) and concentrated to dryness. The residue was dissolved in 50 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) and washed with saturated NaHCOaqueous solution and H2O. The organic phase was dried over NaSOand filtered, concentrated to dryness to give N4,3′,5′-tribenzoyl-2′-Deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-C-methylcytidine (2.0 g, Yield: 91%).

N4,3′,5′-tribenzoyl-2′-Deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-C-methylcytidine (2.0 g, 1 eq) was refluxed in 80% aqueous AcOH overnight. After cooling and standing at room temperature (15° C.), most of the product precipitated and then was filtered through a sintered funnel. White precipitate was washed with water and co-evaporated with toluene to give a white solid. The filtrate was concentrated and co-evaporated with toluene to give additional product which was washed with water to give a white solid. Combining the two batches of white solid gave 1.50 g of 3′,5′-dibenzoyl-2′-Deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-C-methyluridine (Yield: 91%).

To a solution of 3′,5′-dibenzoyl-2′-Deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-C-methyluridine (1.5 g, 1 eq) in MeOH (10 mL) was added a solution of saturated ammonia in MeOH (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 30 min, and then warmed to room temperature slowly. After the reaction mixture was stirred for another 18 hours, the reaction mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure to give the residue, which was purified by column chromatography to afford pure compound 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-C-methyluridine (500 mg, Yield: 60%).

 

Example numbers 13-54 and 56-66 are prepared using similar procedures described for examples 5-8. The example number, compound identification, and NMR/MS details are shown below:

 

entry 25
Figure US08334270-20121218-C00063
entry 251H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 1.13-1.28 (m, 12H), 3.74-3.81 (m, 2H), 3.95-4.08 (m, 1H), 4.20-4.45 (m, 2H), 4.83-4.87 (m, 1H), 5.52-5.58 (m, 1H),5.84-6.15 (m, 3H), 7.17-7.23 (m, 3H), 7.35-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.54-7.57(m, 1H), 11.50 (s. 1H); MS, m/e 530.2 (M + 1)+

 

…………………………………..

 

Synthesis of diastereomerically pure nucleotide phosphoramidates.

Ross BS, Reddy PG, Zhang HR, Rachakonda S, Sofia MJ.

J Org Chem. 2011 Oct 21;76(20):8311-9. doi: 10.1021/jo201492m. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

The HCV NS5B nucleoside and non-nucleoside inhibitors.

Membreno FE, Lawitz EJ.

Clin Liver Dis. 2011 Aug;15(3):611-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2011.05.003. Review.

Discovery of a β-d-2′-deoxy-2′-α-fluoro-2′-β-C-methyluridine nucleotide prodrug (PSI-7977) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus.

Sofia MJ, Bao D, Chang W, Du J, Nagarathnam D, Rachakonda S, Reddy PG, Ross BS, Wang P, Zhang HR, Bansal S, Espiritu C, Keilman M, Lam AM, Steuer HM, Niu C, Otto MJ, Furman PA.

J Med Chem. 2010 Oct 14;53(19):7202-18. doi: 10.1021/jm100863x.

Mechanism of activation of PSI-7851 and its diastereoisomer PSI-7977.

Murakami E, Tolstykh T, Bao H, Niu C, Steuer HM, Bao D, Chang W, Espiritu C, Bansal S, Lam AM, Otto MJ, Sofia MJ, Furman PA.

J Biol Chem. 2010 Nov 5;285(45):34337-47. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.161802. Epub 2010 Aug 26.

 

Michael J. Sofia,Donghui Bao, Wonsuk Chang, Jinfa Du, Dhanapalan Nagarathnam, Suguna Rachakonda, P. Ganapati Reddy, Bruce S. Ross, Peiyuan Wang, Hai-Ren Zhang, Shalini Bansal, Christine Espiritu, Meg Keilman, Angela M. Lam, Holly M. Micolochick Steuer, Congrong Niu, Michael J. Otto, and Phillip A. Furman; Discovery of a β-D-2-Deoxy-2-a-fluoro-2-β-C-methyluridine Nucleotide Prodrug (PSI-7977) for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus; J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 7202–7218; Pharmasset, Inc.

 

Bruce S. Ross, P. Ganapati Reddy , Hai-Ren Zhang , Suguna Rachakonda , and Michael J. Sofia; Synthesis of Diastereomerically Pure Nucleotide Phosphoramidates; J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76 (20), pp 8311–8319; Pharmasset, Inc.

 

Peiyuan Wang, Byoung-Kwon Chun, Suguna Rachakonda, Jinfa Du, Noshena Khan, Junxing Shi, Wojciech Stec, Darryl Cleary, Bruce S. Ross and Michael J. Sofia; An Efficient and Diastereoselective Synthesis of PSI-6130: A Clinically Efficacious Inhibitor of HCV NS5B Polymerase; J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74 (17), pp 6819–6824;Pharmasset, Inc.

 

Jeremy L. Clark, Laurent Hollecker, J. Christian Mason, Lieven J. Stuyver, Phillip M. Tharnish, Stefania Lostia, Tamara R. McBrayer, Raymond F. Schinazi, Kyoichi A. Watanabe, Michael J. Otto, Phillip A. Furman, Wojciech J. Stec, Steven E. Patterson, and Krzysztof W. Pankiewicz; Design, Synthesis, and Antiviral Activity of 2‘-Deoxy-2‘-fluoro-2‘-C-methylcytidine, a Potent Inhibitor of Hepatitis C Virus Replication; J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48 (17), pp 5504–5508; Pharmasset, Inc

 

 

 

SOVALDI is the brand name for sofosbuvir, a nucleotide analog inhibitor of HCV NS5B polymerase.

The IUPAC name for sofosbuvir is (S)-Isopropyl 2-((S)-(((2R,3R,4R,5R)-5-(2,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl)-4-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methyltetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methoxy)-(phenoxy)phosphorylamino)propanoate. It has a molecular formula of C22H29FN3O9P and a molecular weight of 529.45. It has the following structural formula:

 

 

SOVALDI™ (sofosbuvir) Structural Formula Illustration

 

Sofosbuvir is a white to off-white crystalline solid with a solubility of ≥ 2 mg/mL across the pH range of 2-7.7 at 37 oC and is slightly soluble in water.

SOVALDI tablets are for oral administration. Each tablet contains 400 mg of sofosbuvir. The tablets include the following inactive ingredients: colloidal silicon dioxide, croscarmellose sodium, magnesium stearate, mannitol, and microcrystalline cellulose. The tablets are film-coated with a coating material containing the following inactive ingredients: polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol, talc, titanium dioxide, and yellow iron oxide.

DO NOT FORGET TO CLICK

SEE………………….http://orgspectroscopyint.blogspot.in/2015/02/sofosbuvir-visited.html

J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 5504.
WO2008045419A1
CN201180017181

 

 

(WO2015139602) Sofosbuvir New Patent

(WO2015139602) 2′-SUBSTITUTED-2,2′-DEHYDRATED URIDINE OR 2′-SUBSTITUTED-2,2′-DEHYDRATED CYTIDINE COMPOUND AND PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOF
ZHANG, Rongxia
A further object of the present invention to provide a method for preparing a compound of formula I.
The present invention provides a process for preparing a compound I 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-substituted uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-cytidine using the following formula or 2′-deoxy-2′-substituted 2′-2′-substituted nitrile or uridine 2′-deoxy-2′-substituted-2′-carbonitrile The method of cytidine compound,
2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-methyl-uridine (IIIa) is the preparation of anti-hepatitis C drugs Sofosbuvir key intermediate.
Sofosbuvir developed by Gilead Science Company, FDA on December 6, 2013 Sofosbuvir formally approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Sofosbuvir is first used to treat certain types of HCV infection without the use of interferon effective and safe drugs. Clinical trials have shown, sofosbuvir can achieve very high proportion of sustained virologic response (clinical cure). More revolutionary breakthrough that, sofosbuvir without joint peginterferon α situation is still very significant effect, such as sofosbuvir ribavirin genotype 2 and genotype 3 patients with previously untreated chronic hepatitis C continued virological response rate of 100%. Sofosbuvir is a prodrug is metabolized in vivo to 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-methyl-uridine-5′-monophosphate.
Currently reported 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-methyl uridine synthetic methods are as follows:

In the literature (Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2005,48,5504) in order cytidine as a raw material, first selectively protected 3 ‘, 5′-hydroxyl group, and then oxidizing the 2′-hydroxyl to a carbonyl group, and the reaction of methyllithium get the 2’-hydroxyl compound, and then removing the protective group, use benzoyl protected 3 ‘, 5’-hydroxyl group, and then reacted with DAST fluorinated compound, followed by hydrolysis and aminolysis reaction products, such as the following Reaction Scheme. The method of route length, the need to use expensive silicon ether protecting group molecule relatively poor economy; conducting methylation time will generate a non-methyl enantiomer beta bits.

In Patent (WO2005003147, WO2006031725A2, US20040158059) using 2′-fluoro-2′-methyl – ribose derivative with N- benzoyl cytosine for docking the reaction, then after the hydrolysis, aminolysis reaction to obtain the final product, As shown in the following reaction scheme. Raw material of the process is not readily available, synthetic steps cumbersome, expensive; the reaction product obtained contained docking base for the alpha position isomers, need purification removed to form waste.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present inventors have designed and synthesized a compound of formula I as shown, the compound may be a fluorinated or nitrile reaction of 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-get-substituted uridine or 2 under appropriate conditions’ – 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-deoxy-2′-substituted cytidine or nitrile uridine or 2′-substituted-2′-deoxy-2′-substituted-2′-cytidine nitrile compound; or a compound of formula I or a nitrile group by fluoro reaction, followed by deprotection reaction to give 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-substituted uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro–2 ‘- cytidine or 2′-substituted-2′-deoxy-2′-nitrile-substituted uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′-substituted-2′-cytidine compound nitrile group; or a compound of formula I through the opening cyclization reaction, and then through the group of fluoro or nitrile, and finally deprotection reaction to give 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-substituted uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2’-substituted Cellular glycoside or 2 ‘substituted-2′-deoxy-2′-carbonitrile 2′-deoxy-uridine or 2′-substituted-2’-cytidine compound nitrile group; or a compound of formula I through a ring-opening reaction, and then 2 ‘- hydroxyl forming a leaving group, and then after a nitrile group or a fluorinated reaction, the final deprotection reaction of 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-substituted uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′- cytidine or 2′-fluoro-2′-substituted-2′-deoxy-2′-nitrile-substituted uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′-substituted-2’-cytidine nitrile compound.
It is therefore an object of the present invention is to provide a compound of the general formula I prepared 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-substituted uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2′-substituted cytidine or 2′-substituted-2′-deoxy-2′-carbonitrile uridine or 2′-deoxy-2′-substituted-2′-carbonitrile The method of cytidine compound.
Example 1:
The 2′-C- methyl uridine (18.4g, 0.07mol), N, N’- carbonyldiimidazole (216.2g, 0.10mol), sodium bicarbonate (8.4g, 0.10mol) was suspended N, N- two dimethylformamide (50ml), the temperature was raised to 130 ℃, reaction for 4 hours, cooled and filtered to remove inorganic salts, the filtrate was added ethyl acetate (200ml), analyze the material at room temperature, suction filtered, washed with ethyl acetate cooled to, drying to give a yellow solid (19.9g, yield: 83%).
Ia: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CD 3 OD): [delta] 7.80 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.05 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.91 (s, 1H), 4.34 (d, 1H, J = 4.8Hz), 4.07 (m, 1H), 3.56 (m, 2H), 1.63 (s, 3H); ESI-MS m / z (M + 1) 241.
Example 2:
The compound of Example 1 Ia (0.24g, 1mmol)) was dissolved in 70% HF in pyridine was heated to 140 ~ 150 ℃, stirred for 3 hours, cooled and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, the residue was added acetone, beating, and filtered to give solid (0.18g, yield: 70%).
IIIa: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): [delta] 11.48 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.00 (d, 1H, J = 15.6 Hz), 5.67 (m , 2H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 3.85 (m, 3H), 3.62 (s, 1H), 1.25 (d, 3H, J = 16.8Hz), ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 259.
Example 3:
Compound Ib (0.45g, 1mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of dichloromethane and pyridine, was added DAST (0.32g), stirred for 24 hours, added dichloromethane (20ml) was diluted with water (30ml × 2), dried over anhydrous dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and the solvent removed under reduced pressure to give the residue was subjected to column chromatography to give the product (0.36g, yield: 78%).
IIa: 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 and DMSO-d 6 ): [delta] 7.99 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.34 ~ 7.61 (m, 7H ), 6.10 (brs, 1H), 5.64 (brs, 1H), 5.42 (d, J = 8.0Hz, 1H), 4.53-4.68 (m, 3H), 1.40 (d, J = 22.8Hz, 3H); ESI -MS m / z (M + 1) 469.
Example 4:
The compound of Example 3 IIa (0.47g, 1mmol) dissolved in 10% methanol solution of ammonia and stirred overnight, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was slurried in ethyl acetate, filtered to give a white solid (0.2g, yield : 77%).
IIIa: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): [delta] 11.48 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.00 (d, 1H, J = 15.6 Hz), 5.67 (m , 2H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 3.85 (m, 3H), 3.62 (s, 1H), 1.25 (d, 3H, J = 16.8Hz), ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 259.
Example 5:
Compound IVa (0.57g, 1mmol) was dissolved in dichloroethane (20ml) was added trifluoromethanesulfonic acid trimethylsilyl ester (1ml), was heated for 12 hours, cooled, and the reaction solution was concentrated dryness, added two dichloromethane (100ml) was dissolved, washed successively with water (50ml) and saturated brine (50ml), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated to dryness to give an oil which was purified by column chromatography to give a white solid (0.3g, yield : 67%).
Ib: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ7.96-8.10 (m, 6H), 7.41-7.65 (m, 9H), 7.32 (d, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz), 6.09 (d, 1H, J = 5.4Hz), 5.79 (m, 2H), 4.67 (m, 1H), 4.48 (m, 2H), 1.81 (s, 3H); ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 447.
Example 6:
N The compound of Example 1 Ia (1.3g, 5.4mmol) dissolved in dry, N- dimethylformamide (10ml) was added p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (1.12g, 5.9mmol) and 3,4- dihydropyran (1.28ml, 14.04mmol), The reaction was stirred for 5 hours at room temperature, water was added and the methylene chloride solution was separated, the organic layer was concentrated and purified by silica gel chromatography to give the product 1.3g.
Ic: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): [delta] 7.29 (m, 1H), 6.08 (m, 1H), 5.61 (m, 1H), 4.33-4.72 (m, 4H), 3.37-3.90 (m, 6H), 1.43-1.82 (m, 12H), 1.25 (s, 3H); ESI-MS m / z (M + 1) 427.
Example 7:
The solvent was removed, the residue was purified compound of Example 6 Ic (0.43g, 1mmol) was dissolved in 70% HF in pyridine was heated to 100 ~ 120 ℃, stirred for 5 hours, cooled, reduced pressure was purified through silica gel column to give a solid ( 0.18g, yield: 72%).
IIIa: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): [delta] 11.48 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.00 (d, 1H, J = 15.6 Hz), 5.67 (m , 2H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 3.85 (m, 3H), 3.62 (s, 1H), 1.25 (d, 3H, J = 16.8Hz), ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 259.
Example 8:
The compound of Example 6 Ic (50mg, 0.122mmol) was dissolved in methanol (1ml) was added 1N sodium hydroxide solution (0.2ml), stirred at room temperature overnight, water was added and the methylene chloride solution was separated, the organic layer was concentrated after purified by column chromatography to give the product (45mg, yield: 87%).
VA: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): [delta] 7.89 (d, 1H, J = 4.5Hz), 6.01 (s, 1H), 5.95 (d, 1H, J = 4.5Hz), 5.65 (m, 2H ), 4.73 (m, 3H), 4.59 (m, 1H), 3.52-4.30 (m, 4H), 1.56-1.80 (m, 12H), 1.32 (s, 3H); ESI-MS m / z (M + 35) 461.
Example 9:
The mixture of Example 8 Compound Va (0.43g, 1mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane and pyridine, was added DAST (0.32g), stirred for 24 hours, added dichloromethane (20ml) was diluted with water (30ml × 2) and washed , dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain compound IIb. Compound IIb is dissolved in methanol (10ml) was added p-toluenesulfonic acid (200mg), stirred for 6 hours at room temperature, the methanol was removed under reduced pressure, silica gel column chromatography to give the product IIIa (180mg, yield: 75%).
IIIa: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): [delta] 11.48 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.00 (d, 1H, J = 15.6 Hz), 5.67 (m , 2H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 3.85 (m, 3H), 3.62 (s, 1H), 1.25 (d, 3H, J = 16.8Hz), ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 259.
Example 10:
The 2′-C- methyl uridine (0.2g, 0.8mmol) was dissolved in N, N- dimethylformamide (4ml) was added N, N’- carbonyldiimidazole (0.194g, 1.2mmol) and sodium bicarbonate (55mg, 0.66mmol), was heated to 130 ℃, stirred for 4 hours, cooled and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in 70% HF in pyridine was heated to 140 ~ 150 ℃, stirred for 3 hours, cooled, The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, the residue was added to acetone and filtered to obtain a solid IIIa (0.12g, yield: 60%).
Example 11:
The 2′-C- methyl uridine (0.2g, 0.8mmol) was dissolved in N, N- dimethylformamide (4ml) was added diphenyl carbonate (0.256g, 1.2mmol) and sodium bicarbonate ( 55mg, 0.66mmol), was heated to 150 ℃, stirred for 6 hours, cooled and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in 70% HF in pyridine was heated to 140 ~ 150 ℃, stirred for 3 hours, cooled and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure The residue was added to acetone and filtered to obtain a solid IIIa (0.13g, yield: 65%).
Example 12:
Under nitrogen, the compound of Example 9 Example Va (4.26g, 10mmol) was dissolved in dry tetrahydrofuran (100ml) was added triethylamine (6g, 60mmol), cooled to -78 ℃, was added trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (4.23g , 15mmol), stirred for 1 hour, the reaction system was added saturated ammonium chloride solution, extracted three times with methylene chloride, organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, concentrated, and the residue was subjected to silica gel column chromatography to give the product Vb ( 4g, yield: 72%). ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 557.
Compound Vb (4g) was dissolved in dry tetrahydrofuran, was added tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.87g, 7.1mmol), warmed to reflux, cooled to room temperature after heating for 1 hour, water was added to the reaction system, and extracted with methylene chloride three times, the combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, concentrated, and the residue was subjected to silica gel column chromatography to give the product IIb (2.7g, yield: 88%). ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 427.
Compound IIb (2.7g) was dissolved in methanol (20ml) was added 3M hydrochloric acid (10ml), 50 ℃ stirred for 8 hours, and concentrated to give a solid, was added acetonitrile, beating, and filtered to give the product IIIa (1g, yield: 61%).
IIIa: 1 H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): [delta] 11.48 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.00 (d, 1H, J = 15.6 Hz), 5.67 (m , 2H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 3.85 (m, 3H), 3.62 (s, 1H), 1.25 (d, 3H, J = 16.8Hz), ESI-MS m / z (M-1) 259.








UPDATE DEC2015……….
File:Sofosbuvir structure.svg

SOFOSBUVIR

NEW PATENT WO2015188782,

(WO2015188782) METHOD FOR PREPARING SOFOSBUVIR

CHIA TAI TIANQING PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP CO., LTD [CN/CN]; No. 8 Julong North Rd., Xinpu District Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222006 (CN)

Sofosbuvir synthesis routes currently used include the following two methods:



https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2015188782&redirectedID=true

Preparation Example 1 sofosbuvir implementation

Step (a):

At 0 ℃, dichloro-phenyl phosphate (6.0g, 28.4mmol) in dry dichloromethane (30ml) and stirred added alanine isopropyl ester hydrochloride (4.8g, 28.4mmol), the mixture After stirring and cooling to -55 ℃, was slowly added dropwise triethylamine (6.5g, 64mmol) and dichloromethane (30ml) mixed solution, keeping the temperature during at -55 ℃, dropping was completed, stirring was continued for 60 minutes, after liters to -5 ℃ stirred for 2 hours, TLC monitored the reaction was complete. To remove triethylamine hydrochloride was filtered and the filtrate evaporated under reduced pressure to give compound 3-1 as a colorless oil (Sp / Rp = 1/1).

31 PNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 as internal standard): δ8.25 & 7.94 (1: 1);

1 HNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 MHz): δ7.39-7.34 (m, 2H), 7.27-7.18 (m, 3H), 5.10-5.02 (m, 1H), 4.51 (br, 1H), 4.11 (m, 1H ), 1.49 (d, 3H), 1.29-1.24 (m, 6H);

13 C NMR (CDCl 3 , 300 MHz): δ172.1 (Rp), 196.3 (Sp), 129.8,129.6 (d), 125.9,120.5 (d), 69.7 (d), 50.7 (d), 21.6 (d), 20.4 (d).

Step (b):

At 5 ℃, the compound of formula 2 (5.20g, 20.0mmol) in dry THF (30ml) and stirred at t-butyl chloride (1.0M THF solution, 42ml, 42.0mmol). The reaction temperature was raised to 25 ℃, and the mixture was stirred for 30 minutes. After addition of lithium chloride (21.0mmol), was slowly added dropwise the compound 3-1 (approximately 28.4mmol) and THF (30ml) mixed solution, keeping the temperature during at 5 ℃. Bi drops, stirred for 15 hours. With aqueous 1N HCl (25ml) The reaction solution was quenched (HPLC assay Sp: Rp ratio of 4: 1). Toluene was added (100ml), temperature was raised to room temperature. The organic layer was washed with 1N HCl, water, 5% Na 2 CO 3 and washed with brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and the solvent was distilled off under reduced pressure to a solid, was added methylene chloride (20ml), stirred for 5 minutes plus isopropyl ether, stirring was continued for 2 hours, the precipitated solid was filtered off. The solid was dissolved by heating in dichloromethane (60ml), slowly cooled to room temperature and the precipitated crystalline solid. Repeat if necessary obtain pure crystalline sofosbuvir (2.6g, yield 25%, HPLC purity measured 98.8%).

31 PNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 as internal standard): δ3.54ppm;

13 C NMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz): δ173.1 (d), 162.7 (s), 150.2 (d), 139.3 (d), 129.6 (q);

MS (M + H): 530.1.

Preparation of compounds of formula 2 shown in Example 3-2

(1) a nucleophilic reagent as NaSCN, the phase transfer catalyst is TBAB

The compound (product of Example 1, step (a)) is represented by the formula 3-1 is dissolved in dichloromethane (20ml) was added TBAB (2.8mmol), the NaSCN (35mmol) in water (2.0ml) was added dropwise It was added to the reaction solution. Dropping was completed, stirring was continued for 60 minutes, the solid was removed by filtration. The filtrate was washed with water, add MgSO 4 dried for 24 hours. Filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure, to obtain a compound of formula 3-2 as (where X = SCN).

1 HNMR (CDCl 3 , 500Hz): δ7.32-7.13 (m, 3H), 7.08-7.02 (m, 2H), 5.0-4.9 (m, 1H), 3.92 (m, 1H), 1.49 (m, 3H ), 1.23-1.17 (m, 6H);

31 PNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 internal standard): δ-18.16 / -18.26.

(2) nucleophile NaSCN, phase transfer catalyst is 18-crown-6 ether

The compound (product of Example 1, step (a)) is represented by the formula 3-1 is dissolved in ethyl acetate (20ml) was added 18-crown -6 (2.8mmol), the NaSCN (35mmol) was added to the above the reaction mixture. Dropping was completed, stirring was continued for 60 minutes, the solid was removed by filtration. The filtrate was washed with water, add MgSO 4 dried for 24 hours. Filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure, to obtain a compound of formula 3-2 as (where X = SCN).

(3) nucleophile NaSCN, phase transfer catalyst is TBAB and 18-crown-6

The compound (product of Example 1, step (a)) is represented by the formula 3-1 is dissolved in dichloromethane (20ml) was added TBAB (2.8mmol) and 18-crown -6 (2.8mmol), the NaSCN (35mmol) in water (2.0ml) was added to the reaction solution. Dropping was completed, stirring was continued for 60 minutes, the solid was removed by filtration. The filtrate was washed with water, add MgSO 4 dried for 24 hours. Filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure, to obtain a compound of formula 3-2 as (where X = SCN).

(4) nucleophile as NaN 3 , phase transfer catalyst is TBAB

The compound (product of Example 1, step (a)) is represented by the formula 3-1 is dissolved in dichloromethane (20ml) was added TBAB (2.8mmol), the NaN 3 (35 mmol) in water (2.0ml) solution of was added dropwise to the reaction solution. Dropping was completed, stirring was continued for 60 minutes, the solid was removed by filtration. The filtrate was washed with water, add MgSO 4 dried for 24 hours. Filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure, to obtain a compound of formula 3-2 as (where X = N 3 ).

1 HNMR (CDCl 3 , 500Hz): δ7.30-7.33 (m, 2H), 7.27-7.21 (m, 3H), 5.10-5.05 (m, 1H), 4.12-4.00 (m, 1H), 1.43 (d , 3H), 1.28-1.17 (m, 6H);

31 PNMR- (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 internal standard): δ2.04 / 2.19.

(5) the nucleophilic reagent is KCN, the phase transfer catalyst is TBAB

The compound was dissolved in methylene chloride as in formula 3-1 (20ml), was added TBAB (2.8mmol), the KCN (35mmol) in water (2.0ml) was added dropwise to the reaction solution. Dropping was completed, stirring was continued for 60 minutes, the solid was removed by filtration. The filtrate was washed with water, add MgSO 4 dried for 24 hours. Filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to remove the solvent to give a compound as shown in Formula 3-2 (where X = CN).

1 HNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz): δ7.22-7.13 (m, 3H), 7.09-7.02 (m, 2H), 5.01-4.95 (m, 1H), 4.08-3.93 (m, 1H), 1.43-1.35 (m, 3H), 1.20-1.17 (m, 6H);

31 PNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 internal standard): δ-2.71 / -2.93.

Preparation Example 3 sofosbuvir implementation

(1) X is SCN

Under 5 ℃, the compound (5.20g, 20.0mmol) as shown in Equation 2 in dry THF (30ml) in. T-butyl chloride was added with stirring (1.0M THF solution, 42ml, 42.0mmol). The reaction temperature was raised to 25 ℃, and the mixture was stirred for 30 minutes. After addition of lithium chloride (21.0mmol), was slowly added dropwise a compound of formula 3-2 (Preparation Example 2 28.4 mmol, obtained) and THF (30ml) mixed solution, keeping the temperature during at 5 ℃. After dropping was completed, the mixture was stirred for 15 hours. With aqueous 1N HCl (25ml) The reaction solution was quenched (HPLC assay Sp: Rp ratio of 6: 1). After further addition of toluene (100ml), temperature was raised to room temperature. The organic layer was washed with 1N HCl, water, 5% Na 2 CO 3 and washed with brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and the solvent was distilled off under reduced pressure to a solid, was added methylene chloride (20ml), stirred for 5 minutes plus isopropyl ether, stirring was continued for 2 hours, the precipitated solid was filtered off. The solid was dissolved by heating in dichloromethane (60ml), slowly cooled to room temperature and the precipitated crystalline solid. Repeat if necessary obtain pure crystalline sofosbuvir (3.6g, yield 34%, HPLC purity measured 98.7%).

1 HNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 MHz): [delta] 8.63 (s, 1H, NH), 7.46 (d, 1H, C6-H), 7.36 (t, 2H, O-aromatic), 7.18-7.24 (m, 3H, m, P-aromatic), 6.20-6.14 (d, 1H, Cl’-H), 5.70-5.68 (d, 1H, C5-H), 5.05-4.97 (m, 1H, CH- (CH 3 ) 2 ) , 4.57-4.41 (m, 2H, C5′-H2), 4.12-4.09 (d, 1H, C3′-H), 4.06-3.79 (m, 3H, C3′-OH, C4′-H, Ala-CH -CH 3 ), 3.79 (s, 1H, Ala-NH), 1.44 (d, 3H, C2′-H3), 1.36-1.34 (d, 3H, Ala-CH 3 ), 1.25-1.23 (t, 6H, CH- (CH 3 ) 2 );

P 31 NMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 internal standard): δ3.56.

(2) X is N 3

Under 5 ℃, the compound (5.20g, 20.0mmol) as shown in Equation 2 in dry THF (30ml) in. T-butyl chloride was added with stirring (1.0M THF solution, 42ml, 42.0mmol). The reaction temperature was raised to 25 ℃, and the mixture was stirred for 30 minutes. Was added lithium chloride (21.0mmol), was slowly added dropwise after the compound of formula 3-2 obtained in Preparation Example 2 (about 28.4 mmol) and THF (30ml) mixed solution, keeping the temperature during at 5 ℃. Bi drops, stirred for 15 hours. With aqueous 1N HCl (25ml) The reaction solution was quenched (HPLC assay Sp: Rp ratio of 7: 1). After further addition of toluene (100ml), temperature was raised to room temperature. The organic layer was washed with 1N HCl, water, 5% Na 2 CO 3 and washed with brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and the solvent was distilled off under reduced pressure to a solid, was added methylene chloride (20ml), stirred for 5 minutes plus isopropyl ether, stirring was continued for 2 hours, the precipitated solid was filtered off. The solid was dissolved by heating in dichloromethane (60ml), slowly cooled to room temperature and the precipitated crystalline solid. Repeat if necessary obtain pure crystalline sofosbuvir (4.2g, yield 40%, HPLC purity measured 98.8%).

1 HNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 MHz): [delta] 8.63 (s, 1H, NH), 7.46 (d, 1H, C6-H), 7.36 (t, 2H, O-aromatic), 7.18-7.24 (m, 3H, m, P-aromatic), 6.20-6.14 (d, 1H, Cl’-H), 5.70-5.68 (d, 1H, C5-H), 5.05-4.97 (m, 1H, CH- (CH 3 ) 2 ) , 4.57-4.41 (m, 2H, C5′-H2), 4.12-4.09 (d, 1H, C3′-H), 4.06-3.79 (m, 3H, C3′-OH, C4′-H, Ala-CH -CH 3 ), 3.79 (s, 1H, Ala-NH), 1.44 (d, 3H, C2′-H3), 1.36-1.34 (d, 3H, Ala-CH 3 ), 1.25-1.23 (t, 6H, CH- (CH 3 ) 2 );

P 31 NMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 internal standard): δ3.56.

(3) X is CN

Under 5 ℃, the compound (5.20g, 20.0mmol) as shown in Equation 2 in dry THF (30ml) in. T-butyl chloride was added with stirring (1.0M THF solution, 42ml, 42.0mmol). The reaction temperature was raised to 25 ℃, and the mixture was stirred for 30 minutes. After addition of lithium chloride (21.0mmol), was slowly added dropwise a compound of formula 3-2 obtained in Preparation Example 2 (about 28.4 mmol) and THF (30ml) mixed solution, keeping the temperature during at 5 ℃. Bi drops, stirred for 15 hours. With aqueous 1N HCl (25ml) The reaction solution was quenched (HPLC assay Sp: Rp ratio of 6: 1). After further addition of toluene (100ml), temperature was raised to room temperature. The organic layer was washed with 1N HCl, water, 5% Na 2 CO 3 and washed with brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and the solvent was distilled off under reduced pressure to a solid, was added methylene chloride (20ml), stirred for 5 minutes plus isopropyl ether, stirring was continued for 2 hours, the precipitated solid was filtered off. The solid was dissolved by heating in dichloromethane (60ml), slowly cooled to room temperature and the precipitated crystalline solid. Repeat if necessary obtain pure crystalline sofosbuvir (4.02g, yield 40%, HPLC purity measured 98.8%).

1 HNMR (CDCl 3 , 300 MHz): [delta] 8.63 (s, 1H, NH), 7.46 (d, 1H, C6-H), 7.36 (t, 2H, O-aromatic), 7.18-7.24 (m, 3H, m, P-aromatic), 6.20-6.14 (d, 1H, Cl’-H), 5.70-5.68 (d, 1H, C5-H), 5.05-4.97 (m, 1H, CH- (CH 3 ) 2 ) , 4.57-4.41 (m, 2H, C5′-H2), 4.12-4.09 (d, 1H, C3′-H), 4.06-3.79 (m, 3H, C3′-OH, C4′-H, Ala-CH -CH 3 ), 3.79 (s, 1H, Ala-NH), 1.44 (d, 3H, C2′-H3), 1.36-1.34 (d, 3H, Ala-CH 3 ), 1.25-1.23 (t, 6H, CH- (CH 3 ) 2 );

P 31 NMR (CDCl 3 , 300 Hz, H 3 PO 4 internal standard): δ3.56.

File:Sofosbuvir structure.svg

////////////////

 

Share

European Commission approves Fluenz Tetra for the prevention of seasonal influenza in children

 VACCINE  Comments Off on European Commission approves Fluenz Tetra for the prevention of seasonal influenza in children
Dec 092013
 

Friday, 6 December 2013

AstraZeneca today announced that the European Commission (EC) has granted Marketing Authorisation to FluenzTM Tetra. Fluenz Tetra is a nasally administered four-strain live attenuated influenza vaccine for the prevention of influenza in children and adolescents from 24 months up to 18 years of age. The EC approval makes Fluenz Tetra the first and only intra-nasal four-strain influenza vaccine available in Europe.http://www.pharmalive.com/ec-approves-fluenz-tetra

 

 

Share

Portola gets FDA breakthrough therapy status for andexanet alfa

 breakthrough designation  Comments Off on Portola gets FDA breakthrough therapy status for andexanet alfa
Nov 282013
 

andexanet alfa

Portola gets FDA breakthrough therapy status for andexanet alfa
US-based biopharmaceutical firm Portola Pharmaceuticals has received breakthrough therapy designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its investigational Factor Xa inhibitor antidote, ‘andexanet alfa’.

read all at

http://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/newsportola-gets-fda-breakthrough-therapy-status-for-andexanet-alfa?WT.mc_id=DN_News

Andexanet alfa (PRT4445*): FXa Inhibitor Antidote

Description

  • Recombinant Factor Xa inhibitor antidote
  • Portola has worldwide rights to develop and commercialize andexanet alfa.

Key Characteristics

  • Acts as a Factor Xa decoy that binds and sequesters direct Factor Xa inhibitors in the blood. Once bound to andexanet alfa, the Factor Xa inhibitors are unable to bind to and inhibit native Factor Xa. The native Factor Xa is then available to participate in the coagulation process and restore hemostasis (normal clotting).
  • Preclinical and Phase 1 studies suggest that andexanet alfa has the potential to be a universal reversal agent for all Factor Xa inhibitors.

Potential Indications

  • Reverse Factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulant activity in patients treated with a Factor Xa inhibitor who suffer an uncontrolled bleeding episode or need to undergo emergency surgery

Clinical Development

Phase 2 proof-of-concept studies are underway or planned. These randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of andexanet alfa after dosing of a direct/indirect Factor Xa inhibitor in healthy volunteers.

  • Positive pharmacodynamic and safety data from a Phase 2 study evaluating andexanet alfa with Eliquis® (apixaban) were presented in an oral session at the XXIV Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis in Amsterdam in July 2013. This study is ongoing to evaluate the administration of andexanet alfa bolus plus extended-duration infusion.
  • A Phase 2 study evaluating andexanet alfa and XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) is ongoing.
  • Separate studies evaluating andexanet alfa with Lovenox® (enoxaparin), Lixiana® (edoxaban) and betrixaban are planned.

 

Share

ANDARINE, Male drugs

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on ANDARINE, Male drugs
Nov 252013
 

 

 

Andarine

ostarine structure

(SARM-4, S-4), GTx-007

Acetamidoxolutamide
Androxolutamide

401900-40-1

WO 2002016310

Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARM)

Signal Transduction Modulators

Andarine (GTx-007S-4) is an investigational selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) developed by GTX, Inc for treatment of conditions such as muscle wasting, osteoporosis and benign prostatic hypertrophy, using the non-steroidal androgen antagonist bicalutamide as a lead compound.

Androxolutamide is a nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which had been in early clinical trials at GTx for the treatment of cancer-related cachexia in several cancer types; however, no recent development has been reported for this indication. Preclinical studies had also been ongoing for the treatment of osteoporosis due to androgen deficiency in the aging male. The drug candidate is believed to bind to the testosterone receptor in such a way as to maximize the beneficial effects of the hormone like muscle growth, bone strengthening and enhanced libido, while minimizing the unwanted side effects, such as stimulation of prostate cancer, virilization and acne. This is accomplished by the selective modulation of the androgen receptor depending on tissue type.

The compound was originally developed at GTx. In March 2004, GTx entered into a joint collaboration and license agreement with Ortho Biotech, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson; however, in 2006 the agreement was terminated by mutual agreement of the companies.

Andarine is an orally active partial agonist for androgen receptors. It is less potent in both anabolic and androgenic effects than other SARMs. In an animal model of benign prostatic hypertrophy, andarine was shown to reduce prostate weight with similar efficacy to finasteride, but without producing any reduction in muscle mass or anti-androgenic side effects. This suggests that it is able to competitively block binding of dihydrotestosterone to its receptor targets in the prostate gland, but its partial agonist effects at androgen receptors prevent the side effects associated with the anti-androgenic drugs traditionally used for treatment of BPH

Family: Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator

Half Life: About 4 hours

Formula: C19 H18 F3 N3 O6

Chemical Structure: S-3-(4-acetylamino-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide

Anabolic Rating: Similar to Testosterone Propionate

Facts: Ostarine (*S-4) is a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator produced by GTx Inc, which is currently in the investigational stages of development. A SARM is exactly what it sounds like: a compound (not an anabolic steroid) which has the ability to stimulate the androgen receptor (much the same way as anabolic steroids). Unfortunately, due to its status as a drug still in the developmental stage, most of the research on it has been done in rodents and trials only.

S-4 is an orally active (and highly bioavailable) selective agonist for androgen receptors which was shown to have anabolic effects in muscle and bone tissue. It has been shown to have no measurable effect on lutenizing hormone (LH) or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), but it has been shown to have some effect on prostate weight, with an androgenic potency around 1/3rd of its anabolic potency (1). Still, this is a good trade-off, because it’s anabolic effect has been measured to be roughly the same as testosterone. It has also been shown to produce dose-dependent increases in bone mineral density and mechanical strength in addition to being able decrease body fat and increase lean body mass (2).

Unfortunately, it has a short half-life in humans of only 4 hours (3), and thus far has only gone through phase II clinical testing in humans (4).

Practical Use: This compound has potential use for all aspects of male hormone replacement therapy, and could eventually replace testosterone for this purpose. Since there is currently no accepted test for SARMs, athletes who are subject to drug testing would find it to be a suitable replacement for anabolic steroid use. Since it doesn’t effect LH or FSH, it may also be a highly useful anabolic agent to be used while attempting post-cycle therapy.

Side Effects: Prostate enlargement (1/3rd of what is seen with testosterone) and potential acne are potential side effects, although most users don’t report either of them; much more common are vision problems (floaters, yellow-tinged vision). Water retention, gynecomastia, and most other steroid-related side effects are probably not possible. In addition, inhibition of natural hormone levels is probably minimal or nonexistent at worst.

 

Producing/Developing Company:

Ostarine by GTx Inc.

 

References:

  1. Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 304, Issue 3, 1334-1340, March 2003
  2. Pharmaceutical Research. 2007 Feb;24(2):328-35.
  3. Pharmaceutical Research. 2006 Aug;23(8):1641-58.
  4. GTx Announces That Ostarine Achieved Primary Endpoint Of Lean Body Mass And A Secondary Endpoint Of Improved Functional Performance

 

 

 

The androgen receptor (′AR′″) is a ligand-activated transcriptional regulatory protein that mediates induction of male sexual development and function through its activity with endogenous androgens. Androgens are generally known as the male sex hormones. However, androgens also play a pivotal role in female physiology and reproduction. The androgenic hormones are steroids which are produced in the body by the testis and the cortex of the adrenal gland, or synthesized in the laboratory. Androgenic steroids play an important role in many physiologic processes, including the development and maintenance of male sexual characteristics such as muscle and bone mass, prostate growth, spermatogenesis, and the male hair pattern (Matsumoto, Endocrinol. Met. Clin. N. Am. 23:857-75 (1994). The endogenous steroidal androgens include testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (“DHT”) Testosterone is the principal steroid secreted by the testes and is the primary circulatiag androgen found in the plasma of males. Testosterone is converted to DHT by the enzyme 5 alpha-reductase in many peripheral tissues. DHT is thus thought to serve as the intracellular mediator for most androgen actions (Zhou, et al., Molec. Endocrinol. 9:208-18 (1995)). Other steroidal androgens include esters of testosterone, such as the cypionate, propionate, phenylpropionate, cyclopentylpropionate, isocarporate, enanthate, and decanoate esters, and other synthetic androgens such as 7-Methyl-Nortestosterone (“MENT′”) and its acetate ester (Sundaram et al., “7 Alpha-Methyl-Nortestosterone(MENT): The Optimal Androgen For Male Contraception,” Ann. Med., 25:199-205 (1993) (“Sundaram”)). Because the AR is involved in male sexual development and function, the AR is a likely target for effecting male contraception or other forms of hormone replacement therapy. The AR also regulates female sexual function (i.e., libido), bone formation, and erythropoiesis.

Worldwide population growth and social awareness of family planning have stimulated a great deal of research in contraception. Contraception is a difficult subject under any circumstances. It is fraught with cultural and social stigma, religious implications, and, most certainly, significant health concerns. This situation is only exacerbated when the subject focuses on male contraception. Despite the availability of suitable contraceptive devices, historically, society has looked to women to be responsible for contraceptive decisions and their consequences. Although health concerns over sexually transmitted diseases have made men more aware of the need to develop safe and responsible sexual habits, women still often bear the brunt of contraceptive choice. Women have a number of choices, from temporary mechanical devices such as sponges and diaphragms to temporary chemical devices such as spermicides. Women also have at their disposal more permanent options, such as physical devices like IUDs and cervical caps as well as more permanent chemical treatments, such as birth control pills and subcutaneous implants. However, to date, the only options available for men include the use of condoms or a vasectomy. Condom use, however is not favored by many men because of the reduced sexual sensitivity, the interruption in sexual spontaneity, and the significant possibility of pregnancy caused by breakage or misuse. Vasectomies are also not favored If more convenient methods of birth control were available to men, particularly long term methods that require no preparative activity immediately prior to a sexual act, such methods could significantly increase the likelihood that men would take more responsibility for contraception.

Administration of the male sex steroids (e.g., testosterone and its derivatives) has shown particular promise in this regard due to the combined gonadotropin-suppressing and androgen-substituting properties of these compounds (Steinberger et al, “Effect of Chronic Administration of Testosterone Enanthate on Sperm Production and Plasma Testosterone, Follicle Stimulating Hormones and Luteinizing Hormone Levels: A Preliminary Evaluation of a Possible Male Contraceptive”, Fertility and Sterility 28:1320-28 (1977)). Chronic administration of high doses of testosterone completely abolishes sperm production (azoospermia) or reduces it to a very low level (oligospermia). The degree of spermatogenic suppression necessary to produce infertility is not precisely known, However, a recent report by the World Health Organization showed that weekly intramuscular injections of testosterone enanthate result in azoospermia or severe oligospermia (i.e., less than 3 million sperm per ml) and infertility in 98% of men receiving therapy (World Health Organization Task Force on Methods Ar Regulation of Male Fertility, “Contraceptive Efficacy of Testosterone-Induced Azoospermia and Oligospermia in Normal Men,” Fertilily and Sterility 65:821-29 (1996)).

A variety of testosterone esters have been developed that are more slowly absorbed after intramuscular injection ancd, thus, result in greater androgenic effect. Testosterone enanthate is the most widely used of these esters. While testosterone enanthate has been valuable in terms of establishing the feasibility of hormonal agents for male contraception, it has several drawbacks, including the need for weekly injections and the presence of supraphysiologic peak levels of testosterone immediately following intramuscular injection (Wu, “Effects of Testosterone Enanthate in Normal Men: Experience From a Multicenter Contraceptive Efficacy Study,” Fertility and Sterility 65:626-36 (1996)).

 

“male drugs”. D. D. Miller, K. A. Veverka, and K. Chung report the large-scale synthesis of androgen-receptor modulators exemplified by 3a and 3b. These compounds have a variety of pharmaceutical applications related to male sex hormones, such as male contraceptives and drugs for treating prostate-related conditions. The inventors describe the kilogram-scale production of 3a and 3b by condensing 1 with 2a or 2b, as shown in Figure 1.

The reaction is carried out in the presence of a substantial excess of Cs2CO3 in THF. For the preparation of 3a, 6.17 mol Cs2CO3 is used with 3.37 mol 1; for 3b, 5.4 mol Cs2CO3and 2.7 mol 1 are used. (Disconcertingly, the patent shows the formula of the base as CsCO3, although the calculation of the molar amount is correct.) The preparation of 3atakes 3 h at 50 °C and is monitored by HPLC. TLC is used to monitor the synthesis of3b, which takes 8 h in refluxing THF.

To purify 3a, deionized water is added to an EtOH solution at room temperature to precipitate it; this process is repeated three times. The final yield of 3a is 83%. Purifying the product by using an alcohol and water is a key aspect of the patent and is covered in the claims. However, no analytical data are given to support the claimed purity. The workup of 3b also involves EtOH and water, but solvents EtOAc and MeO-t-Bu are also used; the product is isolated in 52% yield.

The inventors also describe the synthesis of compound 1 at kilogram scale (Figure 2). Acid chloride 5 is prepared by the reaction of carboxylic acid 4 with SOCl2. The acid chloride is not isolated, but it is treated with a solution of aniline derivative 6 and Et3N in THF over 3 h. After it is warmed to room temperature, the mixture is heated to 50 °C for 15 h. The reaction is monitored by TLC; 3.7 kg 1 is isolated by crystallization from warm toluene in 70.3% yield.

The multikilogram-scale synthesis of 4 is also described. The route, shown in Figure 3, starts with the preparation of compound 9 by simultaneously adding 4 M NaOH and a solution of acid chloride 8 in acetone to a mixture of carboxylic acid 7 and 4 M NaOH in acetone. The pH of the reaction mixture is kept at >10 by adding more 4 M NaOH as needed. Intermediate 9 is isolated by crystallization from MeO-t-Bu in 55.6% yield; it is then treated with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in DMF to cyclize it to 10. This is isolated in 87.7% yield by adding water to the reaction mixture. The final step is heating 10 to reflux in 24% aq HBr to produce 4, isolated as a crystalline solid from hot toluene in 81.3% yield.

The patent claims cover compounds related to 3a and 3b in which the nitro group is replaced by nitrile. Unfortunately, no examples are given describing the synthesis of these compounds. This is an efficient process for synthesizing 3a and 3b, and the inventors show that it is suitable for large-scale production. (University of Tennessee Research Foundation [Knoxville]. US Patent 7,968,721, June 28, 2011;

 

Novel pathway for the synthesis of arylpropionamide-derived selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) metabolites of andarine and ostarine
TETRAHEDRON LETTERS,

Volume 54, Issue 18, Pages 2203-2282 (1 May 2013)

Pages 2239-2242
Katharina M. Schragl, Guro Forsdahl, Guenter Gmeiner, Valentin S. Enev, Peter Gaertner

 

Share

Top 10 Foods Highest in Vitamin D

 Ayurveda  Comments Off on Top 10 Foods Highest in Vitamin D
Nov 202013
 

Top 10 Foods Highest in Vitamin D

Vitamin D is an essential vitamin required by the body for the proper absorption of calcium, bone development, control of cell growth, neuromuscular functioning, proper immune functioning, and alleviation of inflammation. A deficiency in vitamin D can lead to rickets, a disease in which bones fail to properly develop. Further, inadequate levels of vitamin D can lead to a weakened immune system, increased cancer risk, poor hair growth, and osteomalacia, a condition of weakened muscles and bones. Conversely, excess vitamin D can cause the body to absorb too much calcium, leading to increased risk of heart attack and kidney stones. The current U.S. DV for vitamin D is 600 IU (international units) and the toxicity threshold for vitamin D is thought to be 10,000 to 40,000 IU/day.2 Vitamin D is oil soluble, which means you need to eat fat to absorb it. It is naturally found mainly in fish oils, fatty fish, and to a lesser extent in beef liver, cheese, egg yolks, and certain mushrooms. Vitamin D is also naturally made by your body when you expose your skin to the sun, and thus, is called the sun-shine vitamin. In addition, vitamin D is widely added to many foods such as milk and orange juice, and can also simply be consumed as a supplement. Below is a list of high vitamin D foods.


1: Cod Liver Oil
Cod liver oil has been a popular supplement for many years and naturally contains very high levels of vitamin A and vitamin D. Cod liver oil provides 10001IU (1667% DV) per 100 gram serving, or 1360IU (340% DV) in a single tablespoon.

 

2: Fish
Various types of fish are high in vitamin D. Typically raw fish contains more vitamin D than cooked, and fatty cuts will contain more than lean cuts. Further, fish canned in oil will have more vitamin D than those canned in water. Raw fish is typically eaten in the form of sushi. Raw Atlantic Herring provides the most vitamin D with 1628IU (271% DV) per 100 gram serving, 2996IU (499% DV) per fillet, and 456IU (76% DV) per ounce. It is followed by Pickled Herring with 680IU (113% DV) per 100g serving, Canned Salmon (127% DV), Raw Mackerel (60% DV), Oil Packed Sardines (45% DV), Canned Mackerel (42% DV), and oil packed Tuna (39% DV).

3: Fortified Cereals
A breakfast staple in the Americas, most commercial cereals are fortified with the essential vitamins and nutrients. Exercise caution and check food labels when purchasing cereals, be sure to pick products that have little or no refined sugars, and no partially hydrogenated oils! Fortified cereals can provide up to 342IU (57% DV) per 100 gram serving (~2 cups), and even more if combined with fortified dairy products or fortified soy milk. Products vary widely so be sure to check the nutrition label before buying.

4: Oysters
In addition to vitamin D, Oysters are a great source of vitamin b12, zinc, iron, manganese, selenium, and copper. Oysters are also high in cholesterol and should be eaten in moderation by people at risk of heart disease or stroke. Raw wild caught Eastern Oysters provide 320IU (80% DV) per 100 gram serving, 269IU (67% DV) in six medium oysters.

5: Caviar (Black and Red)
Caviar is a common ingredient in sushi and more affordable than people think. Caviar provides 232IU (58% DV) of vitamin D per 100 gram serving, or 37.1IU (9% DV) per teaspoon.

6: Fortified Soy Products (Tofu and Soy Milk)
Fortified soy products are often fortified with both vitamin D and calcium. Fortified Tofu can provide up to 157IU (39% DV) of vitamin D per 100 gram serving, or 44IU (11% DV) per ounce. Fortified Soy Milk can provide up to 49IU (12% DV) of vitamin D per 100 gram serving, 119IU (30% DV) per cup. Amounts of vitamin D vary widely between products, so be sure to check nutrition facts for vitamin D content.

7: Salami, Ham, and Sausages
Salami, Ham, and Sausages are a good source of vitamin b12, and copper. Unfortunately, they are also high in cholesterol and sodium, and so should be limited by people at risk of hypertension, heart attack, and stroke. Salami provides 62.0IU (16% DV) of vitamin D per 100 gram serving, or 16.7IU (4% DV) per ounce (3 slices). It is followed by Bologna Pork 56IU (9% DV) per 100 grams, and Bratwurst 44IU (7% DV) per 100 gram serving.

8: Fortified Dairy Products
Dairy products are already high in calcium, so it makes sense to fortify them with vitamin D. Milk can provide up to 52.0IU (13% DV) of vitamin D per 100 gram serving, 127IU (32% DV) per cup. Cheese can provide up to 6.6IU (2% DV) in a cubic inch, and butter provides 7.8IU (2% DV) in a single tablespoon. Check nutrition labels for exact amounts.

9: Eggs
In addition to vitamin D, eggs are a good source of vitamin B12, and protein. Eggs provide 37.0IU (9% DV) of vitamin D per 100 gram serving, or 17.0IU (4% DV) in a large fried egg.

10: Mushrooms
More than just a high vitamin D food, mushrooms also provide Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid) and copper. Lightly cooked white button mushrooms provide the most vitamin D with 27.0IU (7% DV) per 100 gram serving, or 7.6IU (2% DV) per ounce.

 

Share
Nov 192013
 

 

(NaturalNews) Various cultures around the world already understand that herbs such as ginger, cinnamon, garlic and turmeric can effectively treat conditions like diabetes. According to research from the biomedical science department at the King Faisal University in Saudi Arabia, garlic may be the most powerful of them all for treating diabetes.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/042941_garlic_diabetes_treatment_oxidative_stress.html##ixzz2l5NBhJ00

Share

TAK 733

 Phase 3 drug, Uncategorized  Comments Off on TAK 733
Nov 172013
 

(R)-3-(2,3-Dihydroxypropyl)-6-fluoro-5-(2-fluoro-4-iodophenylamino)-8-methylpyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4,7(3H,8H)-dione

Molecular Weight: 504.23
TAK-733 Formula: C17H15F2IN4O4
CAS Number: 1035555-63-5

Biological Activity of TAK-733:

TAK-733 is an orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2 (MEK1/2) with potential antineoplastic activity. MEK inhibitor TAK-733 selectively binds to and inhibits the activity of MEK1/2, preventing the activation of MEK1/2-dependent effector proteins and transcription factors, which may result in the inhibition of growth factor-mediated cell signaling and tumor cell proliferation. MEK1/2 (MAP2K1/K2) are dual-specificity threonine/tyrosine kinases that play key roles in the activation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and are often upregulated in a variety of tumor cell types.

References:

BRAF L597 mutations in melanoma are associated with sensitivity to MEK inhibitors.
Dahlman et al. Cancer Discov. 2012 Jul 13. PMID: 22798288.Discovery of TAK-733, a potent and selective MEK allosteric site inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
Dong et al. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011 Mar 1;21(5):1315-9. PMID: 21310613.

 

Zhao Y * et al. Takeda California, San Diego, Millenium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge and IRIX Pharmaceuticals, Greenville, USA
Process Research and Kilogram Synthesis of an Investigational, Potent MEK Inhibitor.Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012;
16: 1652-1659

MEK kinases regulate the pathway that mediates proliferative and anti-apoptotic signaling factors that promote tumor growth and metastasis. TAK-733 is an MEK kinase inhibitor that entered phase I clinical trials for the treatment of cancer. A noteworthy feature of this short synthesis (25% yield overall) is the one-pot, three-step synthesis of the fluoropyridone D, in which the fluorine atom is present at the outset.
The reaction of F with the nosylate G gave a mixture of N- and O-alkylation products (8:1) from which the desired N-alkylation product was isolated by crystallization. The mixture of N-methyl pyrrolidine (NMP) and methanol used in the final deprotection step, helped to ensure formation of the desired polymorph. The nine-step discovery synthesis (3% overall yield) is also presented.

Share

Zalicus starts Phase Ib clinical trial of neuropathic pain drug

 phase 2, Uncategorized  Comments Off on Zalicus starts Phase Ib clinical trial of neuropathic pain drug
Nov 142013
 

Zalicus

Biopharmaceutical firm Zalicus has started a Phase Ib clinical trial of Z944, a novel oral T-type calcium channel blocker, for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

The company expects to release the results from the laser-evoked potentials (LEP) study in the fourth quarter of 2013.

The study is designed to offer both objective and subjective data on a drug’s ability to modulate pain signalling.

http://www.drugdevelopment-technology.com/news/newszalicus-starts-phase-ib-clinical-trial-of-neuropathic-pain-drug

Z944 is a novel, oral, T-type calcium channel modulator that we are developing for pain.

Z944, an oral T-type Calcium Channel Modulator

Z944 is a novel, oral, state-dependent, selective T-type calcium channel modulator that has demonstrated efficacy in multiple preclinical inflammatory pain models and in a Phase 1b experimental model of pain. T-type calcium channels have been recognized as key targets for therapeutic intervention in a broad range of cell functions and have been implicated in pain signaling. Zalicus is planning to advance a modified release formulation of Z944 through further clinical development.

The wide distribution of T-type calcium channels found in brain, heart, endocrine cells and other tissues provides the possibility of developing therapeutics for multiple indications, including treatment of pain. Zalicus has utilized its expertise in this field to successfully discover high affinity, selective and orally available compounds, such as Z944, that show promise for further development.

 

T-type Calcium Channel Modulators

T-type, or transient-type (referring to the length of time activated), calcium channel modulators target low-voltage-activated, calcium channels. These channels have been recognized as critical components in numerous cell functions and have been implicated in the frequency and intensity of pain signals. Zalicus is investigating compounds to modulate T-type calcium channel signaling in the treatment of pain. Our orally-administered T-type calcium channel blockers have shown efficacy in animal models of acute, chronic and visceral pain, as well as other indications.

patent

WO2009146540

http://www.google.com/patents/WO2009146540A1

compd may be

N-[1-(N-tert-Butylcarbamoylmethyl)piperidin-4-ylmethyl]-3-chloro-5-fluorobenzamide

Share

Improving Drug Delivery Chemotherapy: Light activation improves penetration and efficacy of nanoparticles as carriers

 drugs, GENERIC  Comments Off on Improving Drug Delivery Chemotherapy: Light activation improves penetration and efficacy of nanoparticles as carriers
Nov 132013
 
A schematic showing how chemotherapy-carrying nanoparticles (left) penetrate deeper into tumor sites and decompress blood vessels after the tumors are irradiated with ultraviolet light (right).

Nanoparticles carrying a cancer drug are administered to mice and exposed to UV light, causing them to contract and release the drug into tumors.
Credit: Modified from Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US

http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i45/Improving-Drug-Delivery.html

Nanoparticles are promising cargo ships for targeted drug delivery. But the materials have had limited success treating cancer, because they often can’t penetrate deep into tumors. The nanoparticles are stalled by the extracelluar matrix and compressed blood vessels.

http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i45/Improving-Drug-Delivery.html

Share

TAMOXIFEN, can treat and prevent one type of breast cancer, without the side effects of chemotherapy.

 GENERIC, PROCESS, Uncategorized  Comments Off on TAMOXIFEN, can treat and prevent one type of breast cancer, without the side effects of chemotherapy.
Nov 082013
 

TAMOXIFEN

10540-29-1 CAS

READ ABOUT TITLE AT……….http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/sites/default/files/CIIE_Tamoxifen.mp3

 

Molecular Formula: C26H29NO•C6H8O7
CAS Number: 54965-24-1
Brands: Nolvadex, TAMOXIFEN CITRATE

 

Chemically, NOLVADEX (tamoxifen citrate) is the trans-isomer of a triphenylethylene derivative. The chemical name is (Z)2-[4-(1,2-diphenyl-1-butenyl) phenoxy]-N, N-dimethylethanamine 2 hydroxy-1,2,3- propanetricarboxylate (1:1). The structural and empirical formulas are:

 

 

NOLVADEX (Tamoxifen Citrate) Structural Formula Illustration

 

Tamoxifen citrate has a molecular weight of 563.62, the pKa’ is 8.85, the equilibrium solubility in water at 37°C is 0.5 mg/mL and in 0.02 N HCl at 37°C, it is 0.2 mg/mL.

 

NDA021807 APPR2005-10-29 DARA BIOSCIENCES,

SOLTAMOX

US PATENT  6,127,425

US 6127425 APPROVED 1998-06-26 EXPIRY 2018-06-26

 

Tamoxifen is an antagonist of the estrogen receptor in breast tissue via its active metabolite, hydroxytamoxifen. In other tissues such as the endometrium, it behaves as an agonist, and thus may be characterized as a mixed agonist/antagonist. Tamoxifen is the usual endocrine (anti-estrogen) therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in pre-menopausal women, and is also a standard in post-menopausal women although aromatase inhibitors are also frequently used in that setting.

Some breast cancer cells require estrogen to grow. Estrogen binds to and activates the estrogen receptor in these cells. Tamoxifen is metabolized into compounds that also bind to the estrogen receptor but do not activate it. Because of this competitive antagonism, tamoxifen acts like a key broken off in the lock that prevents any other key from being inserted, preventing estrogen from binding to its receptor. Hence breast cancer cell growth is blocked.

Tamoxifen was discovered by pharmaceutical company Imperial Chemical Industries (now AstraZeneca) and is sold under the trade names Nolvadex, Istubal, and Valodex. However, the drug, even before its patent expiration, was and still is widely referred to by its generic name “tamoxifen.

 

Breast cancer

Tamoxifen is currently used for the treatment of both early and advanced ER+ (estrogen receptor positive) breast cancer in pre- and post-menopausal women.Additionally, it is the most common hormone treatment for male breast cancer. It is also approved by the FDA for the prevention of breast cancer in women at high risk of developing the disease. It has been further approved for the reduction of contralateral (in the opposite breast) cancer.

In 2006, the large STAR clinical study concluded that raloxifene is equally effective in reducing the incidence of breast cancer, but after an average 4-year follow-up there were 36% fewer uterine cancers and 29% fewer blood clots in women taking raloxifene than in women taking tamoxifen, although the difference is not statistically significant.

Nolvadex (tamoxifen) 20 mg tablets

In 2005, the ATAC trial showed that after average 68 months following a 5 year adjuvant treatment, the group that received anastrozole (Arimidex) had significantly better results than the tamoxifen group in measures like disease free survival, but no overall mortality benefit. Data from the trial suggest that anastrozole should be the preferred medication for postmenopausal women with localized breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER) positive.Another study found that the risk of recurrence was reduced 40% (with some risk of bone fracture) and that ER negative patients also benefited from switching to anastrozole.

 

 

Crystallographic structure of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (carbon = white, oxygen = red, nitrogen = blue) complexed with ligand binding domain of estrogen receptor alpha (cyan ribbon)

Tamoxifen

lTamoxifen was first developed in 1962 as a morning-after birth control pill that was successful in experiments with laboratory rats.
lTamoxifen (brand name Nolvadex) is the best-known hormonal treatment and the most prescribed anti-cancer drug in the world.
lUsed for over 20 years to treat women with advanced breast cancer, tamoxifen also is commonly prescribed to prevent recurrences among women with early breast cancer.
lIs a SERMs.
Anti-estrogens work by binding to estrogen receptors, blocking estrogen from binding to these receptors, stopping cell proliferation
lBreast-cancer prevention occurred in 1998 when the National Cancer Institute (NCI) announced results of a six-year study showing that tamoxifen reduced the incidence of breast cancer by 45 percent among healthy but high-risk women.
l13,388 healthy women considered at high risk for breast cancer were recruited
l85 developed breast cancer compared to 154 of those on the placebo or dummy pill.
lpotentially life-threatening side effects. There were 33 cases of endometrial cancer in the tamoxifen group
lThere were 30 cases of blood clots in major veins (deep-vein thrombosis)
lBecause these problems developed exclusively among postmenopausal women
–60-year-old, an age at which 17 out of every 1,000 women can be expected to develop breast cancer within five years
–ages of 35 and 59 were eligible to participate if their risks matched or exceeded those of a 60-year-old
lAlthough tamoxifen has been useful both in treating breast cancer patients and in decreasing the risk of getting breast cancer.
lSide effects arise from the fact that while tamoxifen acts as an antiestrogen that blocks the effects of estrogen on breast cells, it mimics the actions of estrogen in other tissues such as the uterus. Its estrogen-like effects on the uterus stimulate proliferation of the uterine endometrium and increase the risk of uterine cancer.

Adequate patent protection is required to develop an innovation in a timely manner. In 1962, ICI Pharmaceuticals Division filed a broad patent in the United Kingdom (UK) (Application number GB19620034989 19620913). The application stated, “The alkene derivatives of the invention are useful for the modification of the endocrine status in man and animals and they may be useful for the control of hormone-dependent tumours or for the management of the sexual cycle and aberrations thereof. They also have useful hypocholesterolaemic activity”.

This was published in 1965 as UK Patent GB1013907, which described the innovation that different geometric isomers of substituted triphenylethylenes had either oestrogenic or anti-oestrogenic properties. Indeed, this observation was significant, because when scientists at Merrell subsequently described the biological activity of the separated isomers of their drug clomiphene, they inadvertently reversed the naming. This was subsequently rectified.

Although tamoxifen was approved for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in post-menopausal women in 1977 in the United States (the year before ICI Pharmaceuticals Division received the Queen’s Award for Technological Achievement in the UK), the patent situation was unclear. ICI Pharmaceuticals Division was repeatedly denied patent protection in the US until the 1980s because of the perceived primacy of the earlier Merrell patents and because no advance (that is, a safer, more specific drug) was recognized by the patent office in the United States. In other words, the clinical development advanced steadily for more than a decade in the United States without the assurance of exclusivity. This situation also illustrates how unlikely the usefulness of tamoxifen was considered to be by the medical advisors to the pharmaceutical industry in general. Remarkably, when tamoxifen was hailed as the adjuvant endocrine treatment of choice for breast cancer by the National Cancer Institute in 1984, the patent application, initially denied in 1984, was awarded through the court of appeals in 1985. This was granted with precedence to the patent dating back to 1965! So, at a time when world-wide patent protection was being lost, the patent protecting tamoxifen started a 17 year life in the United States. The unique and unusual legal situation did not go uncontested by generic companies, but AstraZeneca (as the ICI Pharmaceuticals Division is now called) rightly retained patent protection for their pioneering product, most notably, from the Smalkin Decision in Baltimore, 1996. (Zeneca, Ltd. vs. Novopharm, Ltd. Civil Action No S95-163 United States District Court, D. Maryland, Northern Division, March 14, 1996.)

 

Title: Tamoxifen
CAS Registry Number: 10540-29-1
CAS Name: (Z)-2-[4-(1,2-Diphenyl-1-butenyl)phenoxy]-N,N-dimethylethanamine
Additional Names: 1-p-b-dimethylaminoethoxyphenyl-trans-1,2-diphenylbut-1-ene
Molecular Formula: C26H29NO
Molecular Weight: 371.51
Percent Composition: C 84.06%, H 7.87%, N 3.77%, O 4.31%
Literature References: Nonsteroidal estrogen antagonist.
Prepn: BE 637389 (1964 to ICI). Identification and separation of isomers: G. R. Bedford, D. N. Richardson, Nature 212, 733 (1966); BE 678807; M. J. K. Harper et al., US 4536516 (1966, 1985 both to ICI). Stereospecific synthesis: R. B. Miller, M. I. Al-Hassan, J. Org. Chem. 50, 2121 (1985). Review of chemistry and pharmacology: B. J. A. Furr, V. C. Jordan, Pharmacol. Ther. 25, 127-205 (1984). Reviews of clinical experience in treatment and prevention of breast cancer: I. A. Jaiyesimi et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 513-529 (1995); C. K. Osborne, N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 1609-1618 (1998).
Properties: Crystals from petr ether, mp 96-98°.
Melting point: mp 96-98°
Derivative Type: Citrate
CAS Registry Number: 54965-24-1
Manufacturers’ Codes: ICI-46474
Trademarks: Kessar (Pharmacia); Nolvadex (AstraZeneca); Tamofène (Aventis); Zemide (Alpharma); Zitazonium (Servier)
Molecular Formula: C26H29NO.C6H8O7
Molecular Weight: 563.64
Percent Composition: C 68.19%, H 6.62%, N 2.49%, O 22.71%
Properties: Fine, white, odorless crystalline powder, mp 140-142°. Slightly sol in water; sol in ethanol, methanol, acetone. Hygroscopic at high relative humidities. Sensitive to uv light. LD50 in mice, rats (mg/kg): 200, 600 i.p.; 62.5, 62.5 i.v.; 3000-6000, 1200-2500 orally (Furr, Jordan).
Melting point: mp 140-142°
Toxicity data: LD50 in mice, rats (mg/kg): 200, 600 i.p.; 62.5, 62.5 i.v.; 3000-6000, 1200-2500 orally (Furr, Jordan)
Derivative Type: (E)-Form
CAS Registry Number: 13002-65-8
Properties: mp 72-74° from methanol.
Melting point: mp 72-74° from methanol
Derivative Type: (E)-Form citrate
Manufacturers’ Codes: ICI-47699
Properties: mp 126-128°.
Melting point: mp 126-128°
CAUTION: Tamoxifen is listed as a known human carcinogen: Report on Carcinogens, Eleventh Edition (PB2005-104914, 2004) p III-239.
Therap-Cat: Antineoplastic (hormonal).
Keywords: Antineoplastic (Hormonal); Antiestrogens; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM).
Synthesis of the E and Z isomers of the antiestrogen Tamoxifen. 
David W.Robertson and John A. Katzenellenbogen. 
Journal of Organic Chemistry 1982 , 47, Pages 2387-2393. 
An early synthesis of Tamoxifen : Production of non stereo specific products. 


 

 For easy of understanding the complete synthesis has been broken down into a number of steps.Step 1. 
 
Step 1.
 
This step shows use of a simple friedel-craft acylation involving Anisole(A) and Phenylacetic acid (B). The acylating agent in this process was a mixture of PCl5 / SnCl4. The ketone C was formed in a 78% yield.


 

Step 2.

 

 

 

Step 2.
 

Alkylation was promoted by treating the ketone C with Sodium hydride (NaH). This removed the acidic protons (located on the position alpha to the carbonyl group) to produce the enolate ion. This could be isolated as the sodium enolate of the ketone treatment of this with ethyl iodide resulted in the formation of compound (D) in a 94% yield. The Ethyl iodide was chosen as the acylating agent probably as it contains the iodide ion , which is an excellent leaving group. It can therefore facilitate an SN2 substitution reaction with relative easy.
 

 


 

Step 3.

 

 

 

Step 3.
  The phenol was deprotected using Lithium ethanthiolate in DMF ( Dimethyl This facilitated the removal of the methyl group and replaced it with a H to form a hydroxl group. Thus forming compound (E) in a 96% yield.

 

This is a key step as it has left a chink in the armour of the molecule. This can then be used to build up a characteristic part of the Tamoxifen molecule. (eg the (diemthylamino)ethyl group can be added easily from here)
 

 


Step 4.

 

 

 

 

Step 4.
 

Then product E can be alkylated by treatment with 2-(dimethylamino) ethy chloride. The most facile site of alklation is the OH group on the phenyl ring. This can be interpreted roughly by using HSAB theory. e.g Hard and Soft acid/base theory. The carbon adjacent to the chloride ion of the reactant 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl chloride is made slightly harder due to the process of symbiosis. This can rationalise the formation between the hard oxygen atom to the normally soft carbon atom. In this case the carbon atom has become slightly harder due to the presence of the hard chorine atom. Hence the interaction is favourable by HSAB theory. The above reaction gives product F via a SN2 substitution reaction in 70% yield.
 

 


Step 5.

 

 

Step5.
 

F on treatment with PhMgBr forms the tertiary alcohol (G).
 

Formation of the Grignard reagent can be achieved via reaction of PhBr + Mg —–> PhMgBr. The Grignard reagent has effectively formed a carbanion species eg C delta negative (-ve). This is due to the presence of the C-Mg bond. the fact that Magnesium is a more electropositive element thus making the Carbon atom the more electronegative element and hence acquiring a negative charge. As a result of the negative nature of the carbon atom it can now attack the delta positive (+ve) Carbon atom of the carbonyl group.
 

 


step 6.

 

 

 

 

Step 6.
The dehydration of F was initiated by treatment of methanoic hydrogen chloride. this gives the required structure of Tamoxifen. However it gives a racemic mixture of both cis and trans isomers.
 

The ratio of the Cis / Trans isomers was (1.3 / 1). These isomers of Tamoxifen can be separated by Silica gel thin layer chromatography with benzene / triethylamine (9:1) as the developing solvent. Analysis of this technique revealed that the Z (Trans) isomer was more mobile than the E (Cis) isomer.

Synthetic Route 2: A Stereospecific Approach.


 

Stereospecific Synthesis of (Z) – Tamoxifen via carbometalation of Alkynylsilanes.

Studied for historical reasons rather than synthetic brilliance. This synthesis was the first stereo specific synthesis of (Z) Trans Tamoxifen. Comparison between this synthesis and the previous route I believe can illustrate the development of synthetic approaches to large molecules. In particular the quest for stereo specific reactions. So starting from an alkynylsilane (A) and through a series of reactions we can generate only the (Z) – Trans isomer of Tamoxifen.


Again for ease of understanding the complete synthesis has been broken down into a number of steps.

Step1.

 

Step1.

 

 

This step contains the vital stereo specific step. Namely the carbometalation of the alkynylsilane.It is this step which establishes the stereochemistry about the double bond. The phenyl (trimethyl silyl) – acetylene was carbometalated with diethylaluminium chloride – titanocene dichloride reactant to produce an organometallic intermediate. This organometallic intermediate was then cleaved with N bromosucciniamide to produce the alkene (B) in 85% yield.

The stereochemistry was assigned as E (Cis) mechanistic evidence suggests that this is linked to some steric reasons.

(Earlier work dedicated to this reaction see : Miller, R.B. Al-Hassan.M.I J.Org.Chem. 1984, 49, 725)


Step2.

Step 2.

The second step shows the stereo specific replacement of the Br group by a phenyl group. This was achieved by use of Palladium – catalysed coupling of compound (B) with phenyl zinc chloride to form (C) the vinylsilane in a 95% yield.

Step3.

 

Step3.

This step during the synthesis was reported to be tricky and several approaches were attempted before a successful technique was discovered.

 

The objective of this step was to replace the trimethyl Silyl group by a suitable halogen atom (e.g. Bromine or Iodine)

However a facile reaction was reported when (C) was treated with bromine – sodium methoxide at -78�C to produce the vinyl bromide (D) in a yield of 85%

 

Step 4.

 

Step 4.

The vinyl bromide (D) coupled well with a Zinc organometallic species to produce (E) the ethyl triaryl olefin in a yield of 84%.


Step 5.

 

Step 5.

The formation of (F) Tamoxifen was achieved by demethylation with sodium ethylthoilate in refluxing dimethyl formamide. then reaction of the phenoxide ion with 2-( dimethylamino)ethyl chloride via a SN2 substitution.

Purification of the crude product was achieved via it’s hydrochloride salt ( via a reaction with HCl (g)) then F was regenerated by treatment with dilute base this produced the stereospecific (Z)- Trans isomer in an overall yield of 60%.

a synthesis

Palladium-Catalyzed Fluoride-Free Cross-Coupling of Intramolecularly ActivatedAlkenylsilanes and Alkenylgermanes: Synthesis of Tamoxifen as a Synthetic Application (pages 642–650)Kenji Matsumoto and Mitsuru ShindoArticle first published online: 23 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201100627

Thumbnail image of graphical abstract

 

 

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2011/cs/c0cs00129e#!divAbstract

 

 

 

 

EP 0883587 A1  WO1997026234A1)

 

Preparation of Z isomer of Tamoxifen

A solution of bromobenzene (3.92g, 25mmol) in ether (5ml) containing a crystal of iodine was added dropwise to a suspension of magnesium turnings (0.63g, 26mmol) in ether (5ml) at reflux, under nitrogen. After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and a solution of l- [ 4- ( 2- chloroethoxy)phenyl]-2-phenyl-l-butanone (3.75g, 12.4mmol) in ether (15ml) was added over 1 hour. The resulting mixture was refluxed for 16 hours, then poured into dilute hydrochloric acid (50ml) and extracted with ether (3x40ml) . The combined ether layers were concentrated, the residual oil was dissolved in ethanol (10ml) and refluxed with concentrated hydrochloric acid (5ml) for 4 hours. The organic phase was separated, dried (Na2S04) and evaporated to dryness to give a yellow oil. Η NMR (see Figures 1 to 4 and discussion below) showed this to be a 2:1 mixture of the Z and E isomers. The oil was then dissolved in warm methanol (about 40°C) and allowed to cool to room temperature. The colourless crystals formed proved to be pure Z isomer of 2-chloroethoxy tamoxifen (4.12g, 11.4mmol, 92% yield) . M.p. 107-109°C, m/z 362/364 (chlorine atom present), <SH 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.33 Hz, CH3) , 2.46 (2H, q, J = 7.33 Hz, CH2CH3) , 3.72 (2H, t, J = 5.86 Hz, 0CH2CH2C1) , 4.09 (2H, t, J = 5.86 Hz, 0CH2CH2C1) , 6.55 (2H, d, J = 8.79 Hz, aromatic protons ortho to 0CH2CH2C1) , 6.79 (2H, d, J = 8.79 Hz, aromatic protons meta to 0CH2CH2C1) , 7.10-7.38 (10H, m, the two remaining C6H5 ,s) (see Figure 5) . The 2-chloroethoxy tamoxifen was reacted with dimethylamine in ethanol, under reflux, to produce the desired Z isomer of tamoxifen.

Analysis of Η NMR data

Figures 1 to 4 represent a mixture of the E- and Z- forms of compound XI described above.

The expansion of the region ό* 0.80 to 1.05 shows two overlapping triplets corresponding to the CH3 groups in the

Z- and E- derivatives respectively. The critical point is the ratio of the heights of the peaks at 0.92 (for the Z) and 0.94 (for the E) , which is approximately 2:1. The expansion of the 4.00 to 4.35 region reveals similar information where ratios are 10:6.4 and 5.56:3.43.

Similarly expansion of the region 3.6 to 3.9 shows the ratio to be 2.46:1. All of these measurements suggest an approximate 2:1 ratio.

Referring to Figure 5, this shows almost pure Z- isomer. It should be noted that there is 660 mg of this from an original mixture of a 2:1 ratio mixture of 780 mg which would contain only 520 mg of the Z-isomer.

 

 

 

Z isomer of tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxi en include stereoselective syntheses (involving expensive catalysts) as described in J. Chem. Soc, Perkin Trans I 1987, 1101 and J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6184 or chromatographic separation of an E/Z mixture of isomers as described in J. Chem. Res., 1985 (S) 116, (M) 1342, 1986 (S) 58, (M) 771.

(Z)-tamoxifen (1) as a white solid, mp: 95.8-96.3 ºC. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3d 0.92 (3H, t, J 7.3 Hz), 2.29 (6H, s), 2.45 (2H, q, J 7.3 Hz), 2.65 (2H, t, J 5.8 Hz), 3.93 (2H, t, J 5.8 Hz), 6.68 (2H, d, J 9.5 Hz), 6.78 (2H, d, J 9.5 Hz), 7.08-7.28 (10H, m).13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3d 13.6 (CH3), 29.0 (CH2), 45.8 (CH3), 58.2 (CH2), 65.5 (CH2), 113.4 (C), 126.0 (C), 126.5 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 128.1 (C), 129.7 (C), 131.8 (CH), 135.6 (CH), 138.2 (CH), 141.3 (CH), 142.4 (CH), 143.8 (C), 156.7 (C). IR (KBr film) nmax/cm-1: 3055, 2979, 2925, 2813, 2769, 1606, 1509, 1240, 1035, 707. GCMS (EI) m/z 371(5%), 58(100%).

 

(Z)-tamoxifen (1) and (E)-tamoxifen (2) in 52% yield. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3d 0.91 (Z isomer. 3H, t, J 7.3 Hz), 0.94 (E isomer. 3H, t, J 7.3 Hz), 2.28 (Z isomer. 6H, s), 2.34 (E isomer. 6H, s), 2.42-2.52 (Z and Eisomers. 4H, m), 2.63 (Z isomer. 2H, t, J 5.9 Hz), 2.74 (E isomer. 2H, t, J 5.9 Hz), 3.94 (Z isomer. 2H, t, J 5.9 Hz), 4.07 (E isomer. 2H, t, J 5.9 Hz), 6.68 (Z isomer. 2H, d, J 9.7 Hz), 6.76 (E isomer. 2H, d, J 9.3 Hz), 6.86-7.36 (Z and E isomers. 10H, m). IR (KBr film) nmax/cm-1: 3081, 3056, 2974, 2826, 2770, 1611, 1509, 1238, 1044. GCMS (EI) m/z: Z isomer, 371(4%), 72 (24%), 58(100%); E isomer, 371(3%), 72 (24%), 58(100%). (the diastereoisomeric ratio was determined by capillary GC analysis and the configuration of the major diastereoisomer established by comparison of the NMR data of the synthetic mixture with an authentic sample of (Z)-tamoxifen (1).

 

 

nmr

 

 

ir

FTIR

shows the typical spectra’s of pure tamoxifen citrate, PCL, a physical mixture of tamoxifen citrate and PCL and drug-loaded implants. The spectrum of tamoxifen citrate shows characteristic absorption bands at 3027 cm−1 (=C-H stretching), 1507 and 1477 (C=C ring stretching) and 3180 cm -1 (-NH2). PCL displays a characteristic absorption band at strong bands such as the carbonyl stretching mode around 1727 cm−1 (C=O), asymmetric stretching 2949 cm−1 (CH 2 ) symmetric stretching 2865 cm−1 (CH 2 ). No changes in the spectrum of the physical mixture and drug-loaded microspheres were evident by FTIR spectroscopy. The strong bands such as the carbonyl peak were clear at all points.

Figure 2: Transmission FTIR spectra of (a) tamoxifen-loaded implant, (b) physical mixture of drug+PCL, (c) pure PCL, (d) pure tamoxifen citrate

enlarged view

Figure 2: Transmission FTIR spectra of (a) tamoxifen-loaded implant, (b) physical mixture of drug+PCL, (c) pure PCL, (d) pure tamoxifen citrate

FTIR spectra of A) tamoxifen citrate; B) PLGA; C) mixture of drug and excipients; D) freshly prepared nanoparticles in the formulation (BS-3HS).

 

FTIR spectra of A) tamoxifen citrate; B) PLGA; C) mixture of drug and excipients; D) freshly prepared nanoparticles in the formulation (BS-3HS).

Mentions: The pure drug tamoxifen citrate, PLGA-85:15, PVA, a mixture of PLGA and PVA, and a mixture of tamoxifen citrate, PLGA, and PVA; and a freshly prepared formulation were mixed separately with IR grade KBr in the ratio of 1:100 and corresponding pellets were prepared by applying 5.5 metric ton pressure with a hydraulic press. The pellets were scanned in an inert atmosphere over a wave number range of 4000–400 cm−1 in Magna IR 750 series II, FTIR instrument (Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA).

 

dsc

Figure 3: DSC thermograms of pure tamoxifen (a), pure PCL (b), physical mixture of drug+PCL (c) and (d) drug-loaded implant. The experiment was carried with crimped aluminum pans and a heating rate of 10ºC/min

 

DSC thermograms of pure tamoxifen (a), pure PCL (b), physical mixture of drug+PCL (c) and (d) drug-loaded implant. The experiment was carried with crimped aluminum pans and a heating rate of 10ºC/min

 

 

xrd

Figure 4: X-ray diffraction studies of pure drug (a), pure PCL (b), physical mixture of drug+PCL (c) and (d) drug-loaded implant

X-ray diffraction studies of pure drug (a), pure PCL (b), physical mixture of drug+PCL (c) and (d) drug-loaded implant

 

synthesis

J.Chem. Research,1985(S) 116, (M) 1342 and 1986 (S) 58, (M) 0771.

Share
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: