AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Worlddrugtracker, Born in Mumbai in 1964 and graduated from Mumbai University, Completed his PhD from ICT ,1991, Mumbai, India, in Organic chemistry, The thesis topic was Synthesis of Novel Pyrethroid Analogues, Currently he is working with AFRICURE PHARMA as ADVISOR earlier GLENMARK LS Research centre as consultant,Principal Scientist, Process Research (bulk actives) at Mahape, Navi Mumbai, India. Prior to joining Glenmark, he worked with major multinationals like Hoechst Marion Roussel, now sSanofi, Searle India ltd, now Rpg lifesciences, etc. he is now helping millions, has million hits on google on all organic chemistry websites. His New Drug Approvals, Green Chemistry International, Eurekamoments in organic chemistry are some most read blogs He has hands on experience in initiation and developing novel routes for drug molecules and implementation them on commercial scale over a 32 year tenure, good knowledge of IPM, GMP, Regulatory aspects, he has several international drug patents published worldwide . He gas good proficiency in Technology transfer, Spectroscopy, Stereochemistry, Synthesis, polymorphism etc He suffered a paralytic stroke in dec 2007 and is bound to a wheelchair, this seems to have injected feul in him to help chemists around the world, he is more active than before and is pushing boundaries, he has one lakh connections on all networking sites, He makes himself available to all, contact him on +91 9323115463, amcrasto@gmail.com

Letermovir, AIC 246

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Letermovir, AIC 246
May 162016
 

Letermovir skeletal.svg

Letermovir, MK 8828, AIC 246

2-[(4S)-8-fluoro-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl]-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4H-quinazolin-4-yl]acetic acid

 CAS 917389-32-3

Letermovir; UNII-1H09Y5WO1F; AIC-246; 2-((4S)-8-Fluoro-2-(4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-3-(2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-4H-quinazolin-4-yl)acetic acid; 2-[(4S)-8-fluoro-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl]-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4H-quinazolin-4-yl]acetic acid; Letermovir [INN]

Molecular Formula: C29H28F4N4O4
Molecular Weight: 572.550633 g/mol

Letermovir (INN) is an antiviral drug that is being developed for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CVM) infections. It has been tested in CMV infected patients with allogeneic stem cell transplants and may also be useful for other patients with a compromised immune system such as those with organ transplants or HIV infections.[1]

The drug has been granted fast track status by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and orphan drug status by the European Medicines Agency.[1]

The drug candidate is under development by Merck & Co., Inc as investigative compound MK-8828.[2]

AIC246, also known as letermovir, is a novel anti-CMV compound with IC50 value of 5.1 ± 1.2 nM. It targets the pUL56 (amino acid 230-370) subunit of the viral terminase complex [1].
The subunit pUL56 is a component of the terminase complex which is responsible for packaging unit length DNA into assembling virions.
AIC246 has a novel mode of action targets the enzyme UL56 terminase and keep active to other drug-resistant virus. The anti-HCMV activity of AIC246 was evaluated in vitro by using different HCMV laboratory strains, GCV-resistant viruses. The result showed that the inhibitory potentcy of AIC246 surpasses the current gold standard GCV by more than 400-fold with respect to EC50s (mean, ∼4.5 nM versus ∼2 μM) and by more than 2,000-fold with respect to EC90 values (mean, ∼6.1 nM versus ∼14.5 μM).  In the CPE-RA strains, the EC50 values of AIC 246 ranged from 1.8 nM to 6.1 nM [2].
In mouse model with HCMV subcutaneous xenograft, oral administration of AIC246 caused significant a dose-dependent reduction of the HCMV titer. 30 mg/kg/d AIC246 for 9 days induced PFU reduction with maximum efficiency, compared with the gold standard GCV at the ED50 and ED90 level [2].
References:
[1].Verghese PS, Schleiss MR. Letermovir Treatment of Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Anti-infective Agent. Drugs Future. 2013, 38(5):291-298.
[2]. Lischka P1, Hewlett G, Wunberg T, et al.In vitro and in vivo activities of the novel anticytomegalovirus compound AIC246.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54(3):1290-1297.

 

NMR

STR1

STR1

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) remains the leading viral cause of birth defects and life-threatening disease in transplant recipients. All approved antiviral drugs target the viral DNA polymerase and are associated with severe toxicity issues and the emergence of drug resistance. Attempts to discover improved anti-HCMV drugs led to the identification of the small-molecular-weight compound AIC246 (Letermovir). AIC246 exhibits outstanding anti-HCMV activity in vitro and in vivo and currently is undergoing a clinical phase IIb trial. The initial mode-of-action studies suggested that the drug acts late in the HCMV replication cycle via a mechanism distinct from that of polymerase inhibitors. Here, we extend our mode-of-action analyses and report that AIC246 blocks viral replication without inhibiting the synthesis of progeny HCMV DNA or viral proteins. The genotyping of mutant viruses that escaped AIC246 inhibition uncovered distinct point mutations in the UL56 subunit of the viral terminase complex. Marker transfer analyses confirmed that these mutations were sufficient to mediate AIC246 resistance. The mapping of drug resistance to open reading frame UL56 suggests that viral DNA processing and/or packaging is targeted by AIC246. In line with this, we demonstrate that AIC246 affects the formation of proper unit-length genomes from viral DNA concatemers and interferes with virion maturation. However, since AIC246-resistant viruses do not exhibit cross-resistance to previously published terminase inhibitors, our data suggest that AIC246 interferes with HCMV DNA cleavage/packaging via a molecular mechanism that is distinct from that of other compound classes known to target the viral terminase.

PATENT

WO 2006133822


Scheme 2:

Chromatography
on a chiral phase

 

 

Scheme 4:

 

Scheme 5:

Synthesis of {8-fluoro-2- [4- (3-methoxyphenyl) piperazin-l -yl] -3- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] -3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-yl }acetic acid

xample 1

N- (2-bromo-6-fluoφhenyl) -N ‘- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] urea

2-methoxy-5-trifluoromethylphenyl isocyanate (274.3 g) are dissolved in acetonitrile (1 L), then 2-bromo-6-fluoroaniline (200 g) was added with acetonitrile (50 mL) flushed. The resulting clear solution is at 38 h reflux (ca. 85 0 stirred C), then under vacuum at 40 0 concentrated C a dogged mush. This is filtered off, with acetonitrile (260 mL, to 0-5 0 C cooled) washed and incubated overnight at 45 0 dried C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen. Thus, a total of 424.3 g of N- (2-bromo-6-fluorophenyl) -N ‘- get [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenylJ-urea as a solid, corresponding to 99.2% of theory.

1 H NMR (300 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 8.93 (s, IH), 8.84 (s, IH), 8.52 (d, V = 2.3, 2H), 7, 55 (d, 2 = Vr = 7.7, IH), 7.38 to 7.26 (m, 3H), 7.22 (d, 2 J = 8.5, IH), 4.00 (s, 3H) ppm;

– – MS (API-ES-pos.): M / z = 409 [(M + H) + , 100%];

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 22.4 and 30.6 min.

example 2

N- (2-bromo-6-fluorophenyl) -N ‘- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] urea (Alterhativsynthese)

2-methoxy-5-trifluoromethylphenyl isocyanate (1.19 kg) are at about 35 0 dissolved melted and C in acetonitrile (4.2 L), then 2-bromo-6-fluoroaniline (870 g) was added and with acetonitrile ( 380 mL) rinsed. The resulting clear solution is at 74-88 45 h 0 stirred C, then under vacuum (200 mbar) at 50 0 C to a dogged mush concentrated (amount of distillate 4.4 L). This is at room temperature with diisopropylether (1.5 L), washed aspirated, with diisopropylether (1.15 L) washed and at 45 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen to constant weight (24 h) dried. Thus, a total of 1, 63 kg Η- (2-bromo-6-fluoro-phenyl) -W- – obtained [2-methoxy-5 (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] urea as a solid, corresponding to 87.5% of theory.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 22.6 and 30.8 min.

example 3

{8-Fluor-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-2-oxo-l,2,3,4-tetrahydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäuremethylester

N- (2-bromo-6-fluorophenyl) -N- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] urea (300 g) under a nitrogen atmosphere in isobutyronitrile (1.2 L) was suspended, then triethylamine

(21O mL), bis (acetonitrile) dichloropalladium (7.5 g), tris- (o-tolyl) phosphine (18.0 g) and

Methyl acrylate (210 mL) were added in this order. The resulting suspension is for 16 hours at reflux (ca. 102 0 stirred C) and then cooled to room temperature. Water (1.2 L) is added and the mixture 1 at room temperature stirred, then aspirated and washed with water / methanol h: washed and acetonitrile (10O mL) (1 1 30O mL). The residue is treated overnight at 45 0 dried C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen. Thus, a total of 208 g as a solid, corresponding to 68.5% of theory.

1 H NMR (300 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 9.73 (s, IH), 7.72 (d, 2 J = 7.3, IH), 7.71 (s, IH), 7 , 33 (d, 2 J = 9.3, IH), 7.15 (dd, 2 J = 9.6, 2 J = 8.6, IH), 7.01 (d, 2 J = 7.3 , IH), 6.99 to 6.94 (m, IH), 5.16 (t, 2 , J = 5.9, IH), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.41 (s, 3H) , 2.81 (dd, 2 J = 15.4, 2 J = 5.8, IH), 2.62 (dd, 2 J = 15.4, 2 J = 6.3, IH) ppm;

MS (API-ES-pos.): M / z = 413 [(M + H) + , 100%], 825 [(2M + H) + , 14%];

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 19.3 min; Pd (ICP): 16,000 ppm.

example 4

{8-Fluor-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-2-oxo-l,2,3,4-tetrahydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäuremethylester (Alternative synthesis)

N- (2-bromo-6-fluorophenyl) -N ‘- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] urea (2.5 kg) is suspended under a nitrogen atmosphere in isobutyronitrile (9 L), then triethylamine (1.31 kg), bis (acetonitrile) dichloropalladium (64.9 g), tris (o-tolyl) phosphine (149 g) and methyl acrylate (1.59 kg) were added in this order. The resulting suspension is 22 hours at 90-100 0 stirred C, then cooled to room temperature. Water (9 L) is added and stirred, then aspirated and washed with water / methanol (1: 1, 2.5 L) at room temperature, the mixture for 1 hour and acetonitrile (850 mL). The residue is treated overnight at 45 0 dried C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen to constant weight (21 h). Thus, a total of 1.90 kg as a solid, corresponding to 74.9% of theory.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 19.4 min.

example 5

{2-Chlor-8-fluor-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäure-methylester / chlorination

A solution of 2.84 kg {8-fluoro-3- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] -2-oxo-l, 2,3,4-tetrahydroquinazolin-4-yl} acetic acid methyl ester in 14.8 l of chlorobenzene is heated to reflux and the solvent is distilled off until water no longer separates. It is to 12O 0 cooled C. Within 10 min phosphorus oxychloride are metered in 3.17 kg, and then is added within a further 10 min 2.10 kg DBU. It is heated to reflux for 9 hours.

For working up the mixture is cooled to 40 0 C., stirred overnight and dosed the reactor contents to 11.4 L of water, previously estimated at 40 0 was tempered C. For dosing an internal temperature of 40-45 to 0 C, are satisfied. The mixture is allowed to cool to room temperature, 11.4 L of dichloromethane, filtered through a Seitz filter plate and the phases are separated. The organic phase is washed with 11.4 L of water, 11.4 L of an aqueous saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and again with 11.4 L of water. The organic phase is concentrated on a rotary evaporator in vacuo and the remaining residue (2.90 kg) is used without further treatment in the next step.

1 H NMR (300 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 7.93 to 7.82 (m, 2H), 7.38 (d, 2 J = 8.9, IH), 7.17 (m, 2H), 6.97 to 6.91 (m, IH), 5.45 and 5.29 (m and t, 2 , J = 5.4, IH), 3.91 and 3.84 (2s, 3H) , 3.48 (s, 3H), 3.0 to 2.6 (m, 2H) ppm;

MS (CI, NH 3 ): m / z = 431 [(M + H) + , 100%];

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 23.5 min; typical Pd value (ICP): 170 ppm.

example 6

{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäuremethylester / Amination – –

(52.5 g) is dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (10O mL), then (25.8 g) and DBU (20.4 g) was added at room temperature 3-methoxyphenylpiperazine, whereupon the temperature rises. The mixture is stirred at reflux for 22 h, then cooled to room temperature, with ethyl acetate (500 mL) and water (200 mL) and the phases separated. The organic phase (200 mL) washed with 0.2N hydrochloric acid (three times 100 mL) and water, dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated. Thus, a total of 62.5 g obtained as a solidified foam, which is reacted as the crude product without further purification.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.6 min.

example 7

{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäuremethylester / Pot chlorination + amination

(50.0 g) is introduced in chlorobenzene (300 mL), then chlorobenzene is partially distilled (5O mL). The mixture is heated to 120 0 cooled C., DBU (36.9 g) is added, then at 120-128 is 0 C phosphorous oxychloride (33.4 mL) over 10 min. metered. The mixture (approximately 130 at reflux for 9 hours 0 C) stirred. Subsequently, at 40 0cooled C, slowly at 40-45 0 C with water (200 mL), cooled to room temperature and diluted with dichloromethane (200 mL), stirred and then the phases separated. The organic phase is washed with water (200 mL), saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (200 mL) and again water (200 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, concentrated by rotary evaporation and then under high vacuum at 50 0 dried C. The residue (48.1 g) is dissolved in chlorobenzene (20 mL), then with 1,4-dioxane (80 mL) at room temperature and 3-methoxyphenylpiperazine (23.6 g) and DBU (18.7 g) was added, whereupon the temperature rises. The mixture is stirred at reflux for 22 h, then cooled to room temperature, with ethyl acetate (500 mL) and water (200 mL) and the phases separated. The organic phase (200 mL) washed with 0.2N hydrochloric acid (three times 100 mL) and water, dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated. Thus, a total of 55.6 g obtained as a solidified foam, which is reacted as the crude product without further purification.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.2 min.

example 8

(^)-{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluormethylphenyl)-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl} acetate / saponification racemate

(64 g) is dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (45O mL) and IN sodium hydroxide solution (325 mL) and stirred for 2 h at room temperature, then dried in vacuo at 30 0 , a part of the solvent C is distilled off (400 mL). Toluene is added (300 mL) and the phases separated. The aqueous phase is washed with toluene (15O mL twice), then the combined organic phases again with IN sodium hydroxide solution (50 mL) are extracted. The pH of the combined aqueous phases with 2N hydrochloric acid (about 150 mL) to 7.5, then MIBK (15O mL) is added. The phases are separated, the aqueous phase extracted again with MIBK (15O mL), then dried the combined MIBK phases over sodium sulfate and at 45 0 concentrated C. Thus, a total of 64 g as an amorphous solid in quantitative yield.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 14.9 min.

Scheme 6:

Separation of enantiomers of {8-fluoro-2- [4- (3-methoxyphenyl) piperazin-l -yl] -3- [2-methoxy-5- (tri-fluoromethyl) phenyl] -3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-yl } acetate

x (2S, 3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) – oxyjbemsteinsäure
x EtOAc

example 9

(2S, 3 £) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid (1: 1 salt) / crystallization

(62.5 g, crude product) is dissolved and filtered in ethyl acetate (495 mL). To the filtrate is (35 25 ‘,) added 2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid (42.0 g), the mixture for 30 minutes. stirred at room temperature, then with (35 25 “) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] -succinic acid – (l: l salt) (165 mg) was inoculated and stirred for 3 days at room temperature, then to 0-3 0 cooled C and stirred for a further 3 h, the suspension is suction filtered and washed with cold ethyl acetate (0-10. 0 C, 35 mL ) washed. the crystals are at 40 h 18 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. Thus 37.1 g of the salt are obtained as a solid, corresponding to 30.4% of theory over three stages (chlorination, amination and crystallization) on the racemate, or 60.8% based on the resulting S enantiomer.

– – 1 H NMR (300 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 7.90 (d, 2 J = 7.8, 4H), 7.56 (d, 2 J = 8.3, IH), 7 , 40 (d, 2 J = 7.8, 4H), 7.28 to 7.05 (m, 4H), 6.91 to 6.86 (m, 2H), 6.45 (d, 2 J = 8.3, IH), 6.39 to 6.36 (m, 2H), 5.82 (s, 2H), 4.94 (m, IH), 4.03 (q, 2 J = 7.1 , 2H), 3.83 (brs, 3H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.47 to 3.36 (m, 8H and water, 2H), 2, 98 to 2.81 (m, 5H), 2.58 to 2.52 (m, IH), 2.41 (s, 6H), 1.99 (s, 3H), 1.18 (t, 2 J = 7.2, 3H) ppm;

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.6 and 18.5 min.

example 10

(25,3iS) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid (1: 1 salt) / recrystallization

(2S, 3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methy lbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – { (l: l salt) (36.8 g) is suspended in ethyl acetate (37o mL) and (77 by heating to reflux 0 C) dissolved. The mixture is slowly cooled to room temperature. Here there is a spontaneous crystallization. The suspension is stirred at RT for 16 h, then 0-5 0 cooled C and stirred for another 3 h. The suspension is suction filtered and washed with cold ethyl acetate (0-10 0 C, twice 15 ml). The crystals are at 45 h 18 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. Thus 33.6 g of the salt are obtained as a solid, corresponding to 91.3% of theory.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.9 and 18.8 min .;

HPLC (Method 3): 99.9% ee

example 11

(5)-{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluormethylphenyl)-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäure

(2IS I , 3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid (l: l salt) (10.1 g, containing 14 ppm of Pd) are suspended in ethyl acetate (100 mL) and shaken with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (10O mL) shaken until both phases are clear. The phases are separated, the organic phase is evaporated. The residue is dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (100 mL) and IN sodium hydroxide solution (31.2 mL) and stirred for 3 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the pH is adjusted with IN hydrochloric acid (about 17 mL) is set to 7.5, MIBK (8O mL) was added, then the pH is adjusted with IN hydrochloric acid (about 2 mL) adjusted to 7.0. The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated. The residue is dissolved in ethanol and concentrated (40 mL), then again in ethanol (40 mL) and concentrated under high vacuum at 50 0 C dried. The solidified foam is at 45 h 18 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. Thus, a total of 5.05 g as an amorphous solid, corresponding to 85.0% of theory.

1 H NMR (300 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 7.53 (d, 2 J = 8.4, IH), 7.41 (brs, IH), 7.22 (d, 2 J = 8 , 5, IH), 7.09 to 7.01 (m, 2H), 6.86 (m, 2H), 6.45 (dd, V = 8.2, 3 J = 1.8, IH) 6.39 to 6.34 (m, 2H), 4.87 (t, 2 J = 7.3, IH), 3.79 (brs, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.50 -3.38 (m, 4H), 2.96 to 2.75 (m, 5H), 2.45 to 2.40 (m, IH) ppm;

MS (API-ES-neg.): M / z = 571 [(MH), 100%];

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 15.1 min;

HPLC (Method 2): 99.8% ee; Pd (ICP): <1 ppm.

example 12

(2 / ?, 3Λ) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid (1: 1 salt) / crystallization R-isomer from the mother liquor

The mother liquor from a crystallization of (2IS ‘, 3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] -succinic acid – {8-fluoro-2- [4- (3-methoxyphenyl) piperazin-l -yl] -3- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] -3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-yl} acetic acid methyl ester (l: l-salt) in 279 g scale is washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (1.5 L ) shaken, the phases are separated and the organic phase is shaken with semi-saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (1.5 L). The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated. The residue (188.4 g) is dissolved in ethyl acetate (1.57 L), then (2R, 3R) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid (121.7 g) was added and the mixture 10 min. stirred at room temperature. Is then treated with (2R, 3R) -2,3-bis [(4-methyl-benzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – (l: l salt) (0.38 g) was inoculated and stirred for 18 h at room temperature, then to 0-3 0 cooled C and stirred for another 3 h. The suspension is suction filtered and washed with cold ethyl acetate (0-10 0 C, 50O ml). The crystals are at 40 h 18 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. So a total of 160 g of the salt are obtained as a solid.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.6 and 18.5 min .;

HPLC (Method 3): -99.0% ee

example 13

(i?)-{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluormethylphenyl)-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl} acetate / production R-isomer

(2Λ, 3 /?) – 2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – {8-fluoro-2- [4- (3-methoxy-phenyl) pipera-tine 1-yl] -3- [ 2-methoxy-5- (trifluormethy l) pheny l] -3, 4-dihydroquinazolin-4-y 1} -acetic acid methyl ester (1: 1 salt) (170 g) are suspended in ethyl acetate (85O mL) and as long as with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (850 mL) shaken until both phases are clear (about 5 min.). The phases are separated, the solvent of the organic phase under normal pressure with 1, 4-dioxane to a final temperature of 99 0 exchanged C (portions distilled total 2.55 L solvent, and 2.55 L of 1,4-dioxane used). The mixture is cooled to room temperature and 18 at room temperature IN sodium hydroxide solution (525 mL) stirred. Subsequently, the pH value with concentrated hydrochloric acid (about 35 mL) is set to 7.5, MIBK (85O mL) was added, then the pH with concentrated hydrochloric acid (ca. 1O mL) adjusted to 7.0. The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated. The residue is dissolved in ethanol and concentrated (350 mL), then again in ethanol (350 mL) at 50 and 0 concentrated C. Thus, a total of 91.6 g as an amorphous solid, corresponding to 91.6% of theory.

HPLC (method 1): R 7 = 14.8 min.

– – Example 14

{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluormethylphenyl)-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl} acetate / racemization R-enantiomer

acetic acid (50 g) is dissolved in acetonitrile (500 mL) and treated with sodium methoxide (30% in methanol, 32.4 mL) and then stirred at reflux for 60 h. After cooling to room temperature the mixture is concentrated in vacuo to half, then with hydrochloric acid (20% strength, ca. 20 ml) adjusted to pH 7.5, MIBK (200 mL) was added and hydrochloric acid (20%) on pH 7 adjusted. The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated to the hard foam. The residue is dissolved in ethanol and concentrated (15O mL), then again in ethanol (15O mL) and concentrated. Thus, 54.2 g as an amorphous solid in quantitative yield.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 14.9 min .;

HPLC (method 4): 80.8 wt.%.

example 15

{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäuremethylester / Esterification racemate

acetic acid (54 g) (540 g) was dissolved in methanol, then concentrated sulfuric acid (7.85 mL) is added. The mixture is stirred at reflux for 26 h, then cooled and concentrated in vacuo to about one third of the original volume. Water (15O mL) and dichloromethane (15O mL) are added, then the phases are separated. The organic phase is washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution (two times 140 mL), dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated to a foamy residue. This is twice in succession in ethanol (150 mL) and concentrated, dried in vacuo using entraining nitrogen then 18 h. Thus, a total of 41.6 g as an amorphous solid, corresponding to 75.2% of theory.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.8 min .;

HPLC (method 4): 85.3 wt.%;

HPLC (Method 3): -8.5% ee

example 16

(25 1 , 3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – { (1: 1 salt) / crystallization of esterified racemate

(41.0 g) is suspended in ethyl acetate (287 mL), then (2S, 3IS) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid (27.5 g) was added. The mixture is 30 minutes. stirred at room temperature, then with (2 <S ‘, 3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – (1: 1 salt) (0.08 g) was inoculated. The suspension is stirred at RT for 16 h, then 0-5 0 cooled C and stirred for another 3 h, then filtered off with suction and washed with cold ethyl acetate (0-10 0 C, four times 16 ml). The crystals are at 45 h 18 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. So a total of 25.4 g of the salt are obtained as a solid, corresponding to 37.4% of theory.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.9 and 18.8 min .;

HPLC (method 4): 99.5 wt.%;

HPLC (Method 3): 99.3% ee

example 17

(iS)-{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluormethylphenyl)-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl} acetate / saponification crystals

(25,3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – (l rl salt) (25.1 g) is suspended in ethyl acetate (25O mL) and shaken with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (250 mL) shaken until both phases are clear. The phases are separated, the organic phase is evaporated. Dissolve the residue in 1, 4-dioxane (25O mL) and IN sodium hydroxide solution (77.4 mL) and stirred for 18 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the pH is adjusted with IN hydrochloric acid (about 50 mL) is set to 7.5, was added MIBK (240 mL), then the pH is adjusted with IN hydrochloric acid (about 15 mL) adjusted to 7.0. The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated. The residue is dissolved in ethanol and concentrated (90 mL), then again in ethanol (90 mL) and concentrated. The solidified foam is at 45 h 180 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. Thus, a total of 12 g as an amorphous solid, corresponding to 81.2% of the theory.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 15.1 min;

HPLC (Method 2): 97.5% ee; Pd (ICP): <20 ppm.

Alternative method for the racemization:

example 18

(i)-{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluormethylphenyl)-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl} acetic acid / saponification enriched R isomer from the mother liquor after crystallization

The mother liquor from a crystallization of (2 J S ‘, 35) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] -succinic acid – (l: l-salt) in 207 g scale is shaken with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (500 mL), the phases are separated and the organic phase is shaken with semi-saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (500 mL). The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated. The residue is dissolved in ethanol (500 mL) and rotary evaporated to a hard foam. This is in 1,4-dioxane (1.6 L) and IN sodium hydroxide solution (1.04 L) and stirred at room temperature for 18 h, then toluene is added (1.5 L) and the phases separated. The aqueous phase is adjusted with hydrochloric acid (20% strength, ca. 155 ml) of pH 14 to pH 8, then is added MIBK (1.25 L) and hydrochloric acid (20% strength, ca. 25 mL) to pH 7 readjusted. The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated to the hard foam. This is at 45 h 18 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. Thus, a total of 150 g obtained as (R / S) mixture as an amorphous solid.

HPLC (Method 2): 14.6% ee

– – Example 19

(i)-{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluormethylphenyl)-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl} acetate / racemization

(150 g, R / S mixture with -14.6% ee) is dissolved in acetonitrile (1.5 L) and treated with sodium methoxide (30% in methanol, 97.2 mL) was added, then stirred at reflux for 77 h , After cooling to room temperature the mixture is concentrated in vacuo to half, then with hydrochloric acid (20% strength, ca. 80 mL) made ​​of pH 13 to pH 7.5, was added MIBK (0.6 L) and treated with hydrochloric acid ( 20% strength, ca. 3 mL) adjusted to pH. 7 The phases are separated, the organic phase dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated to the hard foam. The residue is dissolved in ethanol and concentrated (500 mL), then again in ethanol (500 mL) and concentrated, then 18 h at 450 dried C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen. Thus, a total of 148 g as an amorphous solid, corresponding to 98.7% of theory.

HPLC (Method 2): 1.5% ee

example 20

{8-Fluor-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl]-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-3,4-dihydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäuremethylester (Esterification)

(±) – {8-fluoro-2- [4- (3-methoxyphenyl l) piperazin-1 -yl] -3- (2-methoxy-5-trifluormethy lphenyl) -3, 4-dihydroquinazolin-4-yl} acetic acid (148 g) (1480 g) was dissolved in methanol, then concentrated sulfuric acid (21.5 mL) is added. The mixture is stirred at reflux for 6 h, then cooled and concentrated in vacuo to about one third of the original volume. Water (400 mL) and dichloromethane (400 mL) are added, then the phases are separated. The organic phase (diluted twice 375 mL, 300 mL water) with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated to a foamy residue. This is twice in succession in ethanol (each 400 mL) and concentrated, dried in vacuo using entraining nitrogen then 18 h. Thus, a total of 124 g as an amorphous solid, corresponding to 81.9% of theory.

HPLC (Method 1): R τ = 16.9 min .;

example 21

(25.35) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – (1: 1 salt) / crystallization of esterified racemate

(2S, 3S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – (1: 1 salt) (123 g, 14.4% ee) is suspended in ethyl acetate (861 mL) and filtered, then (2IS ‘, 3IS) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy ] succinic acid (82.5 g). The mixture 30 min. stirred at room temperature, then with (2 £, 3 <S) -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid – (1: 1 salt) (0.24 g) was inoculated. The suspension is stirred for 4 days at RT, then concentrated to approximately 600 mL and again with (25 ‘, 3 1 -2,3-bis [(4-methylbenzoyl) oxy] succinic acid S) – (l: l salt) (0.24 g) was inoculated. The suspension is stirred for 1 week at RT, to 0-5 0 cooled C and further stirred for 3 hours, then filtered off with suction and washed with cold ethyl acetate (0-10 0 C, 4 x 40 ml). The crystals are at 45 h 18 0 C in the VDO using entraining nitrogen dried. So a total of 1 1.8 g of salt are obtained as a solid, corresponding to 5.8% of theory.

Scheme 7:

example 22

N- (2-Fluoφhenyl) -N ‘- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] urea

2-methoxy-5-trifluoromethylphenyl isocyanate (1057.8 g) is dissolved in acetonitrile (4240 mL), then 2-fluoro aniline (540.8 g) was added with acetonitrile (50 mL) flushed.The resulting clear solution is stirred for 4 h at reflux (about 82 ° C), then seeded at about 78 ° C and about 15 min. touched. The suspension is on 0 0 cooled C, aspirated and the product with acetonitrile (950 mL, to 0-5 0 cooled C) washed. The product is dried overnight at 45 ° C in a vacuum drying oven using entraining nitrogen. Thus, a total of 1380.8 g of N- (2-fluorophenyl) -N ‘- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] -harnstqff obtained as a solid, corresponding to 86.4% of theory.

1 H NMR (500 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 9.36 (s, IH), 9.04 (s, IH), 8.55 (d, 1.7 Hz, IH), 8.17 ( t, 8.2 Hz, IH), 7.33 (d, 8.5 Hz, IH), 7.20 to 7.26 (m, 2H), 7.14 (t, 7.6 Hz, IH), 7, 02 (m, IH), 3.97 (s, 3H) ppm;

MS (API-ES-pos.): M / z = 329 [(M + H) + , 100%];

HPLC: R τ = 48.7 min.

Instrument: HP 1100 Multiple Wavelength detection; Column: Phenomenex-Prodigy ODS (3) 100A, 150 mm x 3 mm, 3 microns; Eluent A: (1.36 g KH 2 PO 4 +0.7 mL H 3PO 4 ) / L water, eluent B:

acetonitrile; Gradient: 0 min 20% B, 40 min 45% B, 50 min 80% B, 65 min 80% B; Flow: 0.5 mL / min; Temp .: 55 0 C; UV detection: 210 nm.

example 23

Methyl (2E) -3- {3-fluoro-2 – [({[2-methoxy-5 – (trifluormethy l) pheny 1] amino} carbonylation l) amino] pheny 1} acrylate

N- (2-fluorophenyl) -N ‘- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] urea (0.225 kg) is dissolved in acetic acid (6.75 L) and (30.3 g) was added with palladium acetate. Then 65% oleum is (247.5 g) is added and then methyl acrylate (90 g). The solution is stirred overnight at room temperature. Then, at about 30 0 C and about 30 mbar acetic acid (3740 g) were distilled off. The suspension is treated with water (2.25 L) and stirred for about 1 hour. The product is drained, washed twice with water (0.5 L) and incubated overnight at 50 0 dried C in a vacuum drying oven using entraining nitrogen. Thus, a total of 210.3 g of methyl (2E) -3- {3-fluoro-be 2 – [({[2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] amino} carbonyl) amino] phenyl} acrylate obtained as a solid, corresponding to 72.2% of theory.

1 H NMR (300 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 9.16 (s, IH), 8.84 (s, IH), 8.45 (d, 1.7 Hz, IH), 7.73 ( m, 2H), 7.33 (m, 3H), 7.22 (d, 8.6 Hz, IH), 6.70 (d, 16Hz, IH), 3.99 (s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 3H) ppm;

MS (API-ES-pos.): M / z = 429.9 [(M + NH,) + ]; 412.9 [(M + H) + ]

HPLC: R τ = 46.4 min.

Instrument: HP 1100 Multiple Wavelength detection; Column: Phenomenex-Prodigy ODS (3) 100A, 150 mm x 3 mm, 3 microns; Eluent A: (1.36 g KH 2 PO 4 +0.7 mL H 3PO 4 ) / L water, eluent B: acetonitrile; Gradient: 0 min 20% B, 40 min 45% B, 50 min 80% B, 65 min 80% B; Flow: 0.5 mL / min; Temp .: 55 0 C; UV detection: 210 nm.

example 24

{8-FluorO-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]-2-oxo-l,2,3,4-tetrahydrochinazolin-4-yl}essigsäuremethylester

Methyl (2E) -3- {3-fluoro-2 – [({[2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] amino} carbonyl) amino] phenyl} acrylate (50 g) is dissolved in acetone (1.2 L) was suspended and 3.7 g) was added l, 8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0] undec-7-ene (. The suspension is heated to reflux (ca..56 ° C) and stirred for 4 h. The resulting clear solution is hot through diatomaceous earth (5 g) was filtered. The diatomaceous earth is rinsed with warm acetone (100 ml). Subsequently, acetone (550 g) was distilled off. The resulting suspension is in 3 h at O 0 cooled and stirred C. The product is drained, washed twice with cold acetone (50 ml) and incubated overnight at 45 0 dried C in a vacuum drying oven using entraining nitrogen. Thus, a total of 44.5 g of {8-fluoro-3- [2-methoxy-5- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] -2-oxo-1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydrochinazo-lin-4-yl} acetic acid methyl ester as a solid, corresponding to 89% of theory.

1 H NMR (300 MHz, d 6 -DMSO): δ = 9.73 (s, IH), 7.72 (d, 2 J = 7.3, IH), 7.71 (s, IH), 7 , 33 (d, 2 J = 9.3, IH), 7.15 (dd, 2 J = 9.6, 2 J = 8.6, IH), 7.01 (d, 2 J = 7.3 , IH), 6.99 to 6.94 (m, IH), 5.16 (t, 2 J =

5.9, IH), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.41 (s, 3H), 2.81 (dd, 1 J = 15.4, V = 5.8, IH), 2.62 (dd, 2 Vr = = 15.4, V = 6.3, IH) ppm;

MS (API-ES-pos.): M / z = 413 [(M + H) + , 100%], 825 [(2M + H) + , 14%];

HPLC: R τ = 37.1 min.

Instrument: HP 1100 Multiple Wavelength detection; Column: Phenomenex-Prodigy ODS (3) 100A, 150 mm x 3 mm, 3 microns; Eluent A: (1.36 g KH 2 PO 4 +0.7 mL H 3PO 4 ) / L water, eluent B: acetonitrile; Gradient: 0 min 20% B, 40 min 45% B, 50 min 80% B, 65 min 80% B; Flow: 0.5 mL / min; Temp .: 55 0 C; UV detection: 210 nm.

 

PATENT

WO 2015088931

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is ubiquitously distributed in the human population. In immunocompetent adults infections are mainly asymptomatic, but in

immunocompromised patients, such as transplant recipients or AIDS patients, life threatening infections occur at a high rate. HCMV is also the leading cause of birth defects among congenitally transmitted viral infections.

Various substituted heterocyclic compounds are inhibitors of the HCMV terminase enzyme. Included in these heterocycles are quinazolines related to Compound A, as defined and described below. These compounds and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof are useful in the treatment or prophylaxis of infection by HCMV and in the treatment, prophylaxis, or delay in the onset or progression of HCMV infection. Representative quinazoline compounds that are useful for treating HCMV infection are described, for example, in US Patent Patent No. 7, 196,086. Among the compounds disclosed in US7, 196,086, is (S)-2-(8-fluoro-3-(2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-2-(4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-l-yl)-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-yl)acetic acid, hereinafter referred to as Compound A. Compound A is a known inhibitor of HCMV terminase. The structure of Compound A is as follows:

Compound A

US Patent Nos. 7,196,086 and 8,084,604 disclose methodology that can be employed to prepare Compound A and related quinazoline-based HCMV terminase inhibitors. These methods are practical routes for the preparation of Compound A and related heterocyclic compounds.

EXAMPLE 6

Preparation of Compound A

To a slurry of compound 7 (20g, 18.9 mmol) in MTBE (40.0 mL) at room temperature was added a solution of sodium phosphate dibasic dihydrate (8.42 g, 47.3 mmol) in water (80 mL) and the resulting slurry was allowed to stir at room temperature for 40 minutes. The reaction mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel and the organic phase was collected and washed with a solution of sodium phosphate dibasic dihydrate (3.37 g, 18.91 mmol) in water (40.0 mL). A solution of KOH (4.99 g, 76 mmol) in water (80 mL) and methanol (10.00 mL) was then added to the organic phase and the resulting mixture was heated to 50 °C and allowed to stir at this temperature for 6 hours. MTBE (20 mL) and water (40 mL) were then added to the

reaction mixture and the resulting solution was transferred to a separatory funnel and the aqueous layer was collected and washed with MTBE (20 mL). Additional MTBE (40 mL) was added to the aqueous layer and the resulting solution was adjusted to pH 4-5 via slow addition of concentrated HCl. The resulting acidified solution was transferred to a separatory funnel and the organic phase was collected, concentrated in vacuo and solvent switched with acetone, maintaining a 30 mL volume. The resulting acetone solution was added dropwise to water and the precipitate formed was filtered to provide compound A as a white solid (10 g, 92%). XH NMR (500 MHz, d6-DMSO): δΗ 12.6 (1H, s), 7.52 (1H, dd, J= 8.6, 1.3 Hz), 7.41 (1H, brs), 7.22 (1H, d, J= 7.2 Hz), 7.08-7.02 (2H, m), 6.87-6.84 (2H, m), 6.44 (1H, dd, J= 8.3, 1.8 Hz), 6.39 (1H, t, J= 2.1 Hz), 6.35 (1H, dd, J= 8.1, 2.0 Hz), 4.89 (1H, t, J= 7.3 Hz), 3.79 (3H, br s), 3.68 (3H, s), 3.47 (2H, br s), 3.39 (2H, br s), 2.96-2.93 (2H, m), 2.82-2.77 (3H, m), 2.44 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 7.4 Hz).

XAMPLE 1

Preparation of Intermediate Compound 2


N,N-dicyclohexylmethylamine

IPAC, 80°C

To a degassed solution of 2-bromo-6-fluoroaniline (1, 99.5 g, 0.524 mol), methyl acrylate (95.0 mL, 1.05 mol), Chloro[(tri-tert-butylphosphine)-2-(2-aminobiphenyl)] palladium(II) (0.537 g, 1.05 mmol) in isopropyl acetate (796 mL), was added degassed N,N-dicyclohexylmethylamine (135 mL, 0.628 mol). The resulting reaction was heated to 80 °C and allowed to stir at this temperature for 5 hours. The resulting slurry was cooled to 20 °C and filtered. The filtrate was washed with 1 M citric acid to provide a solution that contained compound 2 (99.3 g, 97% assay yield) in isopropyl acrylate, which was used without further purification. ‘H NMR (500 MHz, d-CHCl3): δΗ 7.79 ppm (1H, d, J= 15.9 Hz), 7.17 ppm (1H, d, J= 8.2 Hz), 7.00 ppm (1H, ddd, J= 10.7, 8.2, 1.2 Hz), 6.69 ppm (1H, td, J = 8.2, 5.1 Hz), 6.38 ppm (1H, d, J= 15.9 Hz), 4.06 ppm (2H, br s), 3.81 ppm (3H, s).

EXAMPLE 2

Preparation of Intermediate Compound 3

To a solution of compound 2 (48.8 g, 0.250 mol) in 683 mL of isopropyl acetate was added 244 mL of water, followed by di-sodium hydrogen phosphate (53.2 g, 0.375 mol). To the resulting solution was added phenyl chloroformate (39.2 mL, 0.313 mol) dropwise over 30 minutes. The resulting reaction was heated to 30 °C and allowed to stir at this temperature for 5 hours for 4 hours and then was heated to 60 °C and allowed to stir at this temperature for 5 hours for an additional 2 hours to remove excess phenyl chloroformate. An additional 293 mL of isopropyl acetate was then added and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature until the solids completely dissolved into solution. The resulting reaction mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel and the organic phase was washed with 98 mL of water and collected to provide a solution of compound 3 in isopropyl acetate, which was used without further purification. XH NMR (500 MHz, d-acetonitrile): δΗ 7.91 ppm (1H, d, J= 15.9 Hz), 7.85 ppm (1H, br s), 7.63 ppm (1H, d, J= 7.9 Hz), 7.45-7.39 ppm (3H, m), 7.33-7.27 ppm (2H, m), 7.21 ppm (2H, br), 6.60 ppm (1H, d, J= 16.0 Hz).

EXAMPLE 3

Preparation of Intermediate Compound 4

A solution of compound 3 (79.0 g, 0.250 mol), 2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)aniline (52.7 g, 0.276 mol), and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (0.92 g, 0.0075 mol) in isopropyl acetate (780 mL) was heated to reflux and allowed to stir at this temperature for 5 hours. The resulting slurry was cooled to 20 °C, then allowed to stir at this temperature for for two hours at this temperature, then filtered. The collected filter cake was dried in vacuo to provide compound 5 (95.0 g, 0.230 mol) as a white solid, which was used without further purification. ¾ NMR (500 MHz, d-TFA): δΗ 7.98 ppm (1H, d, J= 16.1 Hz), 7.87 ppm (1H, s), 7.47 ppm (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.41 ppm (1H, d, J= 8.5 Hz), 7.35 ppm (1H, q, J= 8.5 Hz), 7.19 ppm (1H, t, J= 8.6 Hz), 6.98 ppm (1H, d, J= 8.6 Hz), 6.56 ppm (1H, d, J= 16.0 Hz), 3.85 ppm (6H, br s).

EXAMPLE 4

Preparation of Intermediate Compound 6

To a stirred suspension of compound 4 (14.0 g, 34.0 mmol) in toluene (140 mL) at room temperature was added 2-picoline (10.1 mL, 102 mmol) followed by PCI5 (8.19 g, 37.3 mmol). The resulting reaction was heated to 40 °C and allowed to stir at this temperature for 4 hours, then was cooled to 0 °C and cautiously (internal temperature kept <15 °C) quenched with KOH (2 M, 102 mL). The resulting solution was allowed to warm to room temperature, allowed to stir for 30 minutes, then was filtered and the filtrate transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic phase was washed sequentially with H3PO4 (1M, 50 mL) and H20 (50 mL) to provide a solution of compound 5 in toluene, which was used without further purification. XH NMR (500 MHz, d6-DMSO): δΗ 7.96 (1H, d, J= 16.2 Hz), 7.74 (1H, d, J= 7.9 Hz), 7.61 (1H, dd, J= 6.7, 1.6 Hz), 7.50 (1H, d, J= 1.9 Hz), 7.43 (1H, t, J= 9.2 Hz), 7.30 (1H, d, J= 8.4 Hz), 7.28 (1H, m), 6.79 (1H, d, J= 16.2 Hz), 3.91 (3H, s), 3.74 (3H, s).

To the solution of compound 5 at room temperature was added an aqueous solution of piperazine hydrochloride (0.40 M, 93.3 mL, 37.3 mmol) followed by Na2HP04 (14.5 g, 102 mmol). The resulting reaction was allowed to stir for 1 hour at room temperature, then transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic phase was washed sequentially with aH2P04 (50 mL) and H20 (50 mL). Salicylic acid (5.16 g, 37.3 mmol) was then added to the organic phase, and the resulting solution was cooled to 0 °C and allowed to stir at this temperature for 1 hour to provide a slurry which was filtered and washed with cold toluene (50 mL). The filter cake was dried under air to provide compound 6 (23.0 g, 31.7 mmol, 93 %) as a white crystalline solid: XH NMR (500 MHz, d6-DMSO): δΗ 12.9 (1H, br s), 7.75 (1H, dd, J= 7.8, 1.8 Hz), 7.72 (1H, d, J= 16.1 Hz), 7.40 (1H, td, J= 7.2, 1.7 Hz), 7.27 (1H, d, J= 7.8 Hz), 7.17 (1H, m), 7.16 (1H, t, J= 8.2 Hz), 7.02 (1H, br s), 6.95 (1H, t, J= 8.6 Hz), 6.88-6.81 (3H, m), 6.78 (1H, br s), 6.60 (1H, dd, J= 8.2, 2.0 Hz), 6.54 (1H, m), 6.48 (1H, d, J= 16.1 Hz), 6.43 (1H, dd, J= 8.0, 2.1 Hz), 3.73 (3H, s), 3.71 (3H, s), 3.69 (4H, br s), 3.68 (3H, s).

Free Base: XH NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN): δΗ 7.91 (1H, d, J= 16.1 Hz), 7.29 (1H, d, J= 8.0 Hz), 7.24 (1H, d, J= 1.4 Hz), 7.20 (1H, t, J= 8.1 Hz), 7.15 (1H, dd, J= 8.6, 1.4 Hz), 6.94 (1H, m), 6.92 (1H, t, J= 8.1 Hz), 6.80 (1H, td, J= 8.1, 5.4 Hz), 6.60 (1H, dd, J= 8.3, 2.2 Hz), 6.54 (1H, t, J= 2.2 Hz), 6.50 (1H, d, J= 16.1 Hz), 6.47 (2H, m), 3.80 (3H, s), 3.79 (3H, s), 3.72 (3H, s), 3.63 (4H, t, J= 5.1 Hz), 3.25 (4H, t, J= 5.0 Hz).

2: 1 NDSA Salt: ‘H NMR (500 MHz, d6-DMSO): δΗ 10.2 (2H, br s), 8.86 (1H, d, J= 8.6 Hz), 7.92 (1H, d, J= 7.0 Hz), 7.47-7.37 (4H, m), 7.27-7.14 (4H, m), 6.96 (1H, d, J= 8.6 Hz), 6.65 (1H, d, J= 8.3 Hz), 6.59 (1H, s), 6.54 (1H, d, J= 15.9 Hz), 6.47 (1H, d, J= 8.3 Hz), 3.91 (4H, m), 3.77 (3H, s), 3.76 (3H, s), 3.74 (3H, s), 3.43 (4H, m). 1,5 -naphthalene disulfonic acid

EXAMPLE 5

Preparation of Intermediate Compound 7

To a suspension of compound 6 (12.5 g, 16.6 mmol) in 125 mL of toluene was added 50 mL of 0.43M aqueous K3P04. The resulting reaction was allowed to stir for 1 hour at room temperature and the reaction mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic phase was collected, washed once with 30 mL 0.43M aqueous K3P04then cooled to 0 °C and aqueous K3P04 (60 mL, 0.43 M, 25.7 mmol) was added. To the resulting solution was added a room temperature solution of ((lS,2S,4S,5R)-l-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-2-((R)-

hydroxy( 1 -(3 -(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)quinolin- 1 -ium-4-yl)methyl)-5-vinylquinuclidin- 1 -ium bromide) (0.704 g, 0.838 mmol) in 1.45 mL of DMF. The resulting reaction was allowed to stir at 0 °C until the reaction was complete (monitored by HPLC), then the reaction mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel and the organic phase was collected and washed sequentially with 1M glycolic acid (25 mL) and water (25 mL). The organic phase was filtered through solka flok and concentrated in vacuo to a total volume of 60 mL. Ethyl acetate (20 mL) was added to the resulting solution, followed by (S,S)-Di-P-Toluoyl-D-tartaric acid (5.61 g, 14.1 mmol). Penultimate seed (0.2 g) was added the resulting solution was allowed to stir at room

temperature for 12 hours. The solution was then filtered and the collected solid was washed twice with ethyl acetate, then dried in vacuo to provide compound 7 as its DTTA salt ethyl acetate solvate (13.8 g, 78%) . ‘H NMR (500 MHz, d6-DMSO): δΗ 13.95 (2H, br s), 7.90 (4H, d, J= 8.1 Hz), 7.55 (1H, dd, J= 8.6, 1.3 Hz), 7.38 (4H, d, J= 8.1 Hz), 7.26 (1H, d, J= 7.8 Hz), 7.09-7.05 (3H, m), 6.91-6.86 (2H, m), 6.44 (1H, dd, J= 8.2, 1.7 Hz), 6.39 (1H, t, J= 2.0 Hz), 6.36 (1H, dd, J= 8.2, 2.0 Hz), 5.82 (2H, s), 4.94 (1H, t, J= 7.1 Hz), 4.02 (2H, q, J= 7.1 Hz), 3.83 (3H, br s), 3.68 (3H, s), 3.64 (3H, s), 3.47 (2H, br s), 3.37 (2H, br s), 2.95 (2H, br s), 2.87- 2.80 (3H, m), 2.56 (1H, dd, J= 14.3, 7.0 Hz), 2.39 (6H, s), 1.98 (3H, s), 1.17 (3H, t, J= 7.1 Hz).

PAPER

Asymmetric Synthesis of Letermovir Using a Novel Phase-Transfer-Catalyzed Aza-Michael Reaction

Department of Process Chemistry, Merck and Co., Inc., P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00076
Publication Date (Web): May 13, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

ACS Editors’ Choice – This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

Abstract

Abstract Image

The development of a concise asymmetric synthesis of the antiviral development candidate letermovir is reported, proceeding in >60% yield over a total of seven steps from commercially available materials. Key to the effectiveness of this process is a novel cinchonidine-based PTC-catalyzed aza-Michael reaction to configure the single stereocenter.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00076

(S)-2-(8-Fluoro-3-(2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-2-(4-(3-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-yl)acetic Acid (Letermovir, 1)

 letermovir (1, 20.2 g, 35.3 mmol, 100 wt %, 94%) as an amorphous white powder. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) δH 7.52 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (brs, 1H), 7.21 (m, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (m, 1H), 6.87 (m, 2H), 6.44 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.36 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.89 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (brs, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.39–3.48 (m, 4H), 2.82–2.95 (m, 4H), 2.80 (dd, J = 14.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (dd, J = 14.9, 7.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 150 MHz) δC 171.8, 160.2, 156.5, 154.6 (d, JCF = 246.3 Hz), 153.2, 152.2, 134.2, 132.3 (d, JCF = 11.2 Hz), 129.6, 124.1 (q, JCF = 271.3 Hz), 123.8 (q, JCF = 3.7 Hz), 122.4, 122.1 (q, JCF = 7.1 Hz), 121.4 (q, JCF = 29.2 Hz), 120.8, 114.5 (d, JCF = 19.5 Hz), 113.3, 108.3, 104.6, 101.9, 59.0, 56.3, 54.8, 47.9, 45.6, 40.0; HR-MS calcd for C29H29F4N4O4+ [M + H]+ 573.2119, found 573.2117 (Δ = 0.2 mmu).

References

 

Masangkay, Estel Grace (July 29, 2014). “Merck Kicks Off Phase 3 Study Of CMV Drug Letermovir”. Retrieved 8 Oct 2014.

Patent ID Date Patent Title
US8084604 2011-12-27 Process for the Preparation of Dihydroquinazolines
US2007191387 2007-08-16 Substituted dihydroquinazolines

 

Patent ID Date Patent Title
US2015133461 2015-05-14 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING AN ANTIVIRALLY ACTIVE DIHYDROQUINAZOLINE DERIVATIVE
US2015050241 2015-02-19 METHOD OF TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS
US2015045371 2015-02-12 Salts of a dihydroquinazoline derivative
US2015038514 2015-02-05 SODIUM AND CALCIUM SALTS OF DIHYDROQUINAZOLINE DERIVATIVE AND USE THEREOF AS ANTIVIRAL AGENTS
US2015038728 2015-02-05 NOVEL ARYLATED CAMPHENES, PROCESSES FOR THEIR PREPARATION AND USES THEREOF
US8816075 2014-08-26 Process for the preparation of dihydroquinazolines
US2014193802 2014-07-10 IDENTIFICATION OF AN ALTERED THERAPEUTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ANTI-HCMV COMPOUNDS AND OF A RESISTANCE AGAINST ANTI-HCMV COMPOUNDS
US2014178432 2014-06-26 PRODUCTION OF DENSE BODIES (DB) FROM HCMV-INFECTED CELLS
US8372972 2013-02-12 Process for the preparation of dihydroquinazolines
US8084604 2011-12-27 Process for the Preparation of Dihydroquinazolines

 

 

Letermovir
Letermovir skeletal.svg
Systematic (IUPAC) name
{(4S)-8-Fluoro-2-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-3-[2-methoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3,4-dihydro-4-quinazolinyl}acetic acid
Clinical data
Routes of
administration
Oral
Legal status
Legal status
  • Investigational
Identifiers
ATC code None
PubChem CID 45138674
ChemSpider 26352849
UNII 1H09Y5WO1F Yes
ChEMBL CHEMBL1241951
Synonyms AIC246
Chemical data
Formula C29H28F4N4O4
Molar mass 572.55 g/mol

/////Letermovir, MK 8828, AIC 246, fast track status, US Food and Drug Administrationorphan drug status ,  European Medicines Agency

COC1=C(C=C(C=C1)C(F)(F)F)N2[C@H](C3=C(C(=CC=C3)F)N=C2N4CCN(CC4)C5=CC(=CC=C5)OC)CC(=O)O

Share

BMS-520, a Potent and Selective Isoxazole-Containing S1P1 Receptor Agonist

 PRECLINICAL, Uncategorized  Comments Off on BMS-520, a Potent and Selective Isoxazole-Containing S1P1 Receptor Agonist
May 132016
 

img

BMS-520
CAS: 1236188-38-7
MF: C23H17F3N4O4
MW: 470.1202

Synonym: BMS-520; BMS 520; BMS520.

INNOVATOR Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

INVENTORS

Scott Hunter Watterson, Alaric J. Dyckman,William J. Pitts, Steven H. Spergel

1-[4-[5-[3-Phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl]-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl]benzyl]azetidine-3-carboxylic acid

 1-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylic acid

US2011300165

1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.20–3.46 (m, 5H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.25 Hz, 2H), 7.60–7. 70 (m, 5H), and 8.06 (d, J = 7. 70 Hz, 2H);

MS m/e 471(M+H+);

HPLC (XBridge 5 μ C18 4.6 × 50 mm, 4 mL/min, solvent A: 10% MeOH/water with 0.2% H3PO4, solvent B: 90% MeOH/water with 0.2% H3PO4, gradient with 0–100% B over 4 min): 3.14 min;

Anal. Calcd for C23H17N4O4F3•0.01 EtOH: C, 58.72; H, 3.65; N, 11.90. Found: C, 58.63; H, 3.41; N, 11.84.

BMS-520 is a potent and selective S1P1 agonist. BMS-520 demonstrated impressive efficacy when administered orally in a rat model of arthritis and in a mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis. Agonism of S1P1, in particular, has been shown to play a significant role in lymphocyte trafficking from the thymus and secondary lymphoid organs, resulting in immunosuppression.

 

Sphingosine-1 -phosphate (SlP) has been demonstrated to induce many cellular effects, including those that result in platelet aggregation, cell proliferation, cell morphology, tumor cell invasion, endothelial cell and leukocyte chemotaxis, endothelial cell in vitro angiogenesis, and lymphocyte trafficking. SlP receptors are therefore good targets for a wide variety of therapeutic applications such as tumor

15 growth inhibition, vascular disease, and autoimmune diseases. SlP signals cells in part via a set of G protein-coupled receptors named SlPi or SlPl, SIP2 or S1P2, SIP3 or S1P3, SlP4 Or S1P4, and SlP5 or S1P5 (formerly called EDG-I, EDG-5, EDG-3, EDG-6, and EDG-8, respectively). [0003] SlP is important in the entire human body as it is also a major regulator of

20 the vascular and immune systems. In the vascular system, SlP regulates angiogenesis, vascular stability, and permeability. In the immune system, SlP is recognized as a major regulator of trafficking of T- and B-cells. SlP interaction with its receptor SlPi is needed for the egress of immune cells from the lymphoid organs (such as thymus and lymph nodes) into the lymphatic vessels. Therefore, modulation

25 of SlP receptors was shown to be critical for immunomodulation, and SlP receptor modulators are novel immunosuppressive agents.

The SlPi receptor is expressed in a number of tissues. It is the predominant family member expressed on lymphocytes and plays an important role in lymphocyte trafficking. Downregulation of the SlPi receptor disrupts lymphocyte

30 migration and homing to various tissues. This results in sequestration of the lymphocytes in lymph organs thereby decreasing the number of circulating lymphocytes that are capable of migration to the affected tissues. Thus, development of an SlPi receptor agent that suppresses lymphocyte migration to the target sites associated with autoimmune and aberrant inflammatory processes could be efficacious in a number of autoimmune and inflammatory disease states. [0005] Among the five SlP receptors, SlPi has a widespread distribution and is highly abundant on endothelial cells where it works in concert with S IP3 to regulate cell migration, differentiation, and barrier function. Inhibition of lymphocyte recirculation by non-selective SlP receptor modulation produces clinical immunosuppression preventing transplant rejection, but such modulation also results in transient bradycardia. Studies have shown that SlPi activity is significantly correlated with depletion of circulating lymphocytes. In contrast, SIP3 receptor agonism is not required for efficacy. Instead, SIP3 activity plays a significant role in the observed acute toxicity of nonselective SlP receptor agonists, resulting in the undesirable cardiovascular effects, such as bradycardia and hypertension. (See, e.g., Hale et al, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 14:3501 (2004); Sanna et al, J. Biol. Chem., 279: 13839 (2004); Anliker et al., J. Biol. Chem., 279:20555 (2004); Mandala et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 309:758 (2004).)

An example of an SlPi agonist is FTY720. This immunosuppressive compound FTY720 (JPI 1080026-A) has been shown to reduce circulating lymphocytes in animals and humans, and to have disease modulating activity in animal models of organ rejection and immune disorders. The use of FTY720 in humans has been effective in reducing the rate of organ rejection in human renal transplantation and increasing the remission rates in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (see Brinkman et al., J. Biol. Chem., 277:21453 (2002); Mandala et al., Science, 296:346 (2002); Fujino et al., J. Pharmacol, and Exp. Ther., 305:45658 (2003); Brinkman et al., Am. J. Transplant, 4: 1019 (2004); Webb et al., J.

Neuroimmunol, 153: 108 (2004); Morris et al., Eur. J. Immunol, 35:3570 (2005); Chiba, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 108:308 (2005); Kahan et al., Transplantation, 76: 1079 (2003); and Kappos et al., N. Engl. J. Med, 335: 1124 (2006)). Subsequent to its discovery, it has been established that FTY720 is a prodrug, which is phosphorylated in vivo by sphingosine kinases to a more biologically active agent that has agonist activity at the SlPi, SIP3, SlP4, and SIP5 receptors. It is this activity on the SlP family of receptors that is largely responsible for the pharmacological effects of FTY720 in animals and humans.

Clinical studies have demonstrated that treatment with FTY720 results in bradycardia in the first 24 hours of treatment (Kappos et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 335: 1124 (2006)). The observed bradycardia is commonly thought to be due to agonism at the SIP3 receptor. This conclusion is based on a number of cell based and animal experiments. These include the use of SIP3 knockout animals which, unlike wild type mice, do not demonstrate bradycardia following FTY720 administration and the use of SlPi selective compounds. (Hale et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 14:3501 (2004); Sanna et al., J. Biol. Chem., 279: 13839 (2004); and Koyrakh et al., Am. J. Transplant., 5:529 (2005)).

The following applications have described compounds as SlPi agonists: WO 03/061567 (U.S. Publication No. 2005/0070506), WO 03/062248 (U.S. Patent No. 7,351,725), WO 03/062252 (U.S. Publication No. 2005/0033055), WO 03/073986 (U.S. Patent No. 7,309,721), WO 03/105771, WO 05/058848, WO

06/047195, WO 06/100633, WO 06/115188, WO 06/131336, WO 2007/024922, WO 07/116866, WO 08/023783 (U.S. Publication No. 2008/0200535), and WO 08/074820. Also see Hale et al., J. Med. Chem., 47:6662 (2004). [0009] There still remains a need for compounds useful as SlPi agonists and yet having selectivity over Sl P3.

SCHEMBL2572635.png

BMS 520

Paper

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2016), 59(6), 2820-2840

Potent and Selective Agonists of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate 1 (S1P1): Discovery and SAR of a Novel Isoxazole Based Series

Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, P.O. Box 4000, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, United States
J. Med. Chem., 2016, 59 (6), pp 2820–2840
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00089
Publication Date (Web): February 28, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society
*Phone: 609-252-6778. E-mail: scott.watterson@bms.com.

Abstract

Abstract Image

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is the endogenous ligand for the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (S1P1–5) and evokes a variety of cellular responses through their stimulation. The interaction of S1P with the S1P receptors plays a fundamental physiological role in a number of processes including vascular development and stabilization, lymphocyte migration, and proliferation. Agonism of S1P1, in particular, has been shown to play a significant role in lymphocyte trafficking from the thymus and secondary lymphoid organs, resulting in immunosuppression. This article will detail the discovery and SAR of a potent and selective series of isoxazole based full agonists of S1P1. Isoxazole 6d demonstrated impressive efficacy when administered orally in a rat model of arthritis and in a mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis.

SEE…..http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00089

 

PAPER

Abstract Image

This article reports an efficient scale-up synthesis of 1-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylic acid (BMS-520), a potent and selective isoxazole-containing S1P1 receptor agonist. This process features a highly regioselective cycloaddition leading to a key intermediate, ethyl 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylate, a chemo-selective hydrolysis of its regioisomers, as well as an improved method for 1,2,4-oxadiazole formation, relative to the original synthesis. The improved process was applied to the preparation of multiple batches of BMS-520 for preclinical toxicological studies.

An Efficient Scale-Up Synthesis of BMS-520, a Potent and Selective Isoxazole-Containing S1P1 Receptor Agonist

Discovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Route 206 and Provinceline Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, United States
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00112
Publication Date (Web): May 05, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society
.HPLC purity 99.8%; tR= 7.62 min (method A); 99.9%; tR = 8.45 min (method B);
LCMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H17F3N4O4 [M + H]+ 445.2. Found: 471.3.
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 3.20–3.46 (m, 5H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.25 Hz, 2H), 7.60–7.70 (m, 5H), and 8.06 (d, J = 7.70 Hz, 2H).
Anal. Calcd for C23H17N4O4F3, 0.44% water: C, 58.42; H, 3.70; N, 11.83. Found: C, 58.52; H, 3.43; N, 11.86.

PATENT

WO 2010085581

Scheme 1

Figure imgf000037_0001

Scheme 2

Figure imgf000038_0001

Scheme 3

Figure imgf000039_0001

Scheme 4

Figure imgf000040_0001
Figure imgf000040_0002

Scheme 5

Figure imgf000041_0001

Scheme 6

Figure imgf000042_0001

Example 1

l-(4-(5-(3-Phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)-l,2,4-oxadiazol-3- yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylic acid

Figure imgf000049_0001

1-A. 4,4,4-Trifluorobut-2-yn-l-ol

Figure imgf000049_0002

To a solution of diisopropylamine (24.7 mL, 176 mmol) in ether (100 mL) at -78 0C was added a 1OM solution of butyllithium in ether (17.6 mL, 176 mmol) over 5 min. After 10 min. at -78°C, 2-bromo-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-l-ene (14.0 g, 80 mmol) was added to the pale yellow solution. After an additional 10 min., paraformaldehyde (2.40 g, 80 mmol) was added, the dry-ice bath was removed, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. As the reaction mixture approached room temperature, it became dark in color. The reaction was quenched with a IN aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid (100 mL), diluted with ether (500 mL), washed with a IN aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid (2 x 100 mL), washed with brine 100 mL, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded a dark liquid which was distilled under low-vacuum (-50 Torr, ~50 0C) to give 4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-yn-l-ol (7.1 g, 57.2 mmol, 72 % yield) as a pale yellow liquid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 2.31 (br. s., IH) and 4.38 – 4.42 (m, 2H).An Alternative Preparation of 1 -A: 4,4,4-Trifluorobut-2-yn- 1 -ol

HO

-CF, (1-A) [00117] To an ether (pre-dried over magnesium sulfate) solution of phenanthroline (2.16 mg, 0.012 mmol) (indicator) at -78°C under nitrogen was added a 2M solution of n-butyl lithium in pentane. An orange color immediately appeared. Trifluoromethylacetylene gas was bubbled through the solution at -78°C. After ~4 min. of gas introduction, the orange color almost completely disappeared, the reaction solution became cloudy (due to some precipitation), and a pale light orange color persisted. Paraformaldehyde was added, and the dry ice/isopropanol bath was removed after 5 min. and replaced with a 00C ice-bath. Stirring was continued for 45 min., the ice bath was removed, and stirring was continued for an additional 1.25 h. The reaction flask was immersed in a 00C ice bath, and a saturated aqueous solution of ammonium chloride (20.0 mL) was added. The layers were separated, and the organic layer was washed with water (2x), washed with brine, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Concentration under low-vacuum (~50 Torr) without heat afforded a dark brown liquid which was purified by vacuum distillation (~50 Torr, -50 0C) to give 4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-yn-l-ol (7.1 g, 57.2 mmol, 72 % yield) as a colorless liquid.

1-B. N-Hydroxybenzimidoyl chloride

Figure imgf000050_0001

This compound was prepared according to the method of Liu, K.C. et al, J. Org. Chem., 45:3916-1918 (1980).To a colorless, homogeneous solution of (E)-benzaldehyde oxime (24.4 g, 201 mmol) in N,N-dimethylformamide (60 mL) at room temperature was added N- chlorosuccinimide (26.9 g, 201 mmol) portion-wise over 30 min. During each addition, the reaction mixture would turn yellow and then gradually return to near colorlessness. Additionally, an exotherm was noted with each portion added to ensure that the reaction initiated after the addition of N-chlorosuccinimide. An ice bath was available, if required, to cool the exotherm. After the addition was complete, the homogeneous reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with 250 mL of water and extracted with ether (3 x 100 mL). The organic layers were combined, washed with water (2 x 100 mL), washed with a 10% aqueous solution of lithium chloride (2 x 100 mL), and washed with brine (100 mL). The aqueous layers were back extracted with ether (100 mL), and the combined organic layers (400 mL) were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded (Z)-N-hydroxybenzimidoyl chloride (30.84 g, 198 mmol, 98 % yield) as a fluffy, pale yellow solid. The product had an HPLC ret. time = 1.57 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 = 155.8. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 7.30 – 7.64 (m, 3H), 7.73 – 7.87 (m, 2H), and 12.42 (s, IH).

l-C. 3-Phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)methanol

Figure imgf000051_0001

To a pale yellow, homogeneous mixture of N-hydroxybenzimidoyl chloride (5.50 g, 35.4 mmol) and 4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-yn-l-ol (5.46 g, 39.6 mmol) in dichloroethane (85 mL) in a 250 mL round bottom flask at 700C was added triethylamine (9.85 mL, 70.7 mmol) in 22 mL of dichloroethane over 2.5 h via an addition funnel (the first -50% over 2 h and the remaining 50% over 0.5 h). After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was complete by HPLC (total time at 700C was 3 h). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. [00121] The reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (100 mL), washed with water (100 mL), and the organic layer was collected. The aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane (2 x 50 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Analysis indicated that the product mixture was composed of a 86: 14 mixture of the desired regioisomer (1-C), (3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5- yl)methanol, and the undesired regioisomer, (3-phenyl-5-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-4- yl)methanol. The mixture was purified by silica gel chromatography using a mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane (1% to pack and load – 5% – 9% – 12%) to afford (3- phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)methanol (5.34 g, 21.96 mmol, 62.1 % yield) as a pale yellow oil. The compound had an HPLC ret. time = 1.91 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 =244.2. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 2.21 (br. s., IH), 4.97 (s, 2H), 7.47 – 7.56 (m, 3H), and 7.65 (d, J=6.60 Hz, 2H).

1-D. 3-Phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid

Figure imgf000052_0001

Preparation of Jones’ Reagent

To an orange, homogeneous solution of chromium trioxide (12.4 g, 0.123 mol) in water (88.4 mL) at 00C was added sulfuric acid (10.8 mL) dropwise via addition funnel over 30 min. with stirring. The addition funnel was rinsed with water

(1 mL) to give 1.23 M solution of Jones’ Reagent (0.123 mol of reagent in 100 mL of solvent).

To a solution of (3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)methanol

(5.24 g, 21.6 mmol) in acetone (75 mL) at room temperature (immersed in a water bath) was added Jones’ Reagent (43.8 mL, 53.9 mmol) via addition funnel slowly over 1.5 h. The dark reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. By HPLC, the reaction was 93% complete. An additional 0.5 equivalents (9 mL) of the Jones’ Reagent was added. After 1 h, the reaction was 95% complete. After an additional 3h, the reaction was 96% complete. An additional 0.5 equivalents (9 mL) of the Jones’ Reagent was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 2.5 h. By HPLC, the reaction was 97% complete. Isopropyl alcohol (6 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 90 min, resulting in a dark green precipitate. The mixture was diluted with ether (600 mL), washed with a 2% aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen sulfite (5 x 100 mL), and the organic layer was collected. The aqueous layer was back-extracted with ether (2 x 100 mL). By HPLC, there was no additional product in the aqueous layer. The combined organic layers were washed with water (100 mL), washed with a saturated aqueous solution of brine (100 mL), and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The aqueous layer was back-extracted with ether (100 mL), and the organic layer was added to the previous organic layers. The solution was concentration under reduced pressure to give 3-phenyl-4-

(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid as an off-white solid. The solid was diluted with dichloromethane (200 mL), washed with a 2% aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen sulfite, washed with brine, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded 3-phenyl-4- (trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid (3.84 g, 14.93 mmol, 69.3 % yield) as a pale yellow solid. The product was 96% pure by HPLC with a ret. time = 1.60 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 = 258.2. [00124] The sodium hydrogen sulfite aqueous layer still contained a significant amount of product. The brine layer contained no additional product and was discarded. The aqueous layer was saturated with sodium chloride, the pH was adjusted to -3.5, and the solution was extracted with ether (3 x 100 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated to afford additional 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid (1.12 g, 4.36 mmol, 20.21 % yield) as a white solid. The product was >99% pure by HPLC with a ret. time = 1.60 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 = 258.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-(I6) δ ppm 7.55 – 7.63 (m, 5H).  The products were combined to give 4.96 g (90% yield) of 3-phenyl-4- (trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid.

An Alternative Preparation of 1-D: 3 -Phenyl -4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5- carboxylic acid starting with (3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)methanol

Figure imgf000054_0001

A mixture of (3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)methanol (2.1 g, 8.64 mmol), TEMPO (0.094 g, 0.604 mmol), and a sodium phosphate buffer (0.67M) (32.2 mL, 21.59 mmol) was heated to 35°C. A solution of sodium phosphate buffer (40 mL, pH -6.5) consisting of a 1: 1 solution OfNaH2PO4 (20 mL, 0.67M) and Na2HPO4 (20 mL, 0.67M) was prepared in acetonitrile (30 mL) was prepared prior to use. Solutions of sodium chlorite (3.91 g, 34.5 mmol) in water (4.5 mL) and bleach (4.3 mL, 6% wt.) were added simultaneously over 40min. The reaction was monitored by HPLC, and after 2 h, -30% of the starting material remained. After 6 h, 10% remained. Additional bleach (100 μL) was added, and the reaction mixture was left at room temperature overnight. [00127] Additional bleach (100 μL) was added. The resulting mixture was allowed to stir at 35°C for additional 2 h. HPLC indicated complete conversion. The reaction was quenched by the slow addition of a solution of sodium sulfite (2.07 mL, 43.2 mmol) in water (90 mL) at 00C, resulting in the disappearance of the brown reaction color. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the remaining aqueous residue was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 40 mL). The organic layers were combined, washed with water (8 mL), washed with brine (8 mL), and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded 3 -phenyl – 4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid (2.2 g, 8.55 mmol, 99 % yield) as a pale yellow solid. An alternative procedure for the for the preparation of 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid starting with 4,4,4-trifluorobut-2ynoate (1-D)

Figure imgf000055_0001

Alt.1 -D- 1. Ethyl 3 -phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylate

Figure imgf000055_0002

To a pale yellow mixture of (Z)-N-hydroxybenzimidoyl chloride (1.04 g, 6.68 mmol) and ethyl 4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-ynoate (1.238 g, 7.45 mmol) in diethyl ether (20 mL) at room temperature was added triethylamine (1.86 mL, 13.4 mmol) over 15 min., resulting in a precipitant. After the addition was complete, the pale yellow slurry was stirred at room temperature over a weekend. The heterogeneous reaction mixture was filtered under reduced pressure to remove the triethylamine hydrochloride salt, and the filtrate was concentrated to give the product mixture as a dark yellow, viscous oil (2.03 g). By HPLC, the reaction mixture was composed of a mixture of the desired regioisomer, ethyl 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5- carboxylate, and the undesired regioisomer, ethyl 3-phenyl-5- (trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-4-carboxylate, in an approximately 15:85 ratio. The compound mixture was dissolved in hexane and sonicated for 5 min. The hexane was decanted off, and the dark red, oily residue was found to have only trace product by HPLC. The hexane was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue (1.89 g) was purified by preparative HPLC. The desired fractions containing ethyl 3-phenyl- 4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylate were concentrated, and the residue was diluted with dichloromethane, washed with a saturated aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded ethyl 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) isoxazole-5-carboxylate (0.087 g, 0.305 mmol, 4.6 % yield) as a pale yellow solid. The compound had an HPLC ret. time = 2.88 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 1.46 (t, J=7.15 Hz, 3H), 4.53 (q, J=7.03 Hz, 2H), 7.48 – 7.55 (m, 3H), and 7.58 (d, J=7.53 Hz, 2H).

An Alternative Preparation of 1-D-l : Ethyl 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5- carboxylic acid starting with ethyl 4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-enoate

1-D-l. Ethyl 2,3-dibromo-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoate

Br L /COOEt

Br (1-D-l) [00129] Bromine (18.4 mL, 357 mmol) was added dropwise over 30 minutes to a solution of (E)-ethyl 4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-enoate (50 g, 297 mmol) in carbon tetrachloride (50 mL) at room temperature under nitrogen. The resulting dark red solution was refluxed for 4 hours. Additional bromine (2ml) was added and heating was continued until the HPLC analysis showed that the starting material had been consumed. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to give light brown oil which used in the next step without purification. HPLC (XBridge 5μ Cl 8 4.6×50 mm, 4 mL/min, Solvent A: 10 % MeOH/water with 0.2 % H3PO4, Solvent B: 90 % MeOH/water with 0.2 % H3PO4, gradient with 0-100 % B over 4 minutes): 2.96 and 3.19 minutes.

l-D-2. (Z/E)-Ethyl 2-bromo-4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-enoate

,COOEt

F3C

Br (l-D-2)

To a solution of ethyl 2,3-dibromo-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoate (1-B-l) in hexane (200 mL) cooled to 00C was added triethylamine (49.7 ml, 357mmol) drop- wise over 35 minutes, during which time a white precipitate formed. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 2 hours until LC indicated complete conversion. The solid was filtered and rinsed with hexane (3 x 5OmL), and the filtrate was concentrated and passed through a short silica gel pad eluting with 10% ethyl acetate/hexane to give (Z/E)-ethyl 2-bromo-4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-enoate (65.5 g, 265mmol, 89 % yield for two steps) as a colorless oil. Alternatively, the crude product can be purified by distillation (85 0C / -60 mmHg). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) 5 7.41 (q, IH, J= 7.28 Hz), 4.35 (q, 2H, J= 7.11 Hz), 1.38 (t, 3H, J= 7.15 Hz); HPLC (XBridge 5μ Cl 8 4.6×50 mm, 4 mL/min, Solvent A: 10 % MeOH/water with 0.2 % H3PO4, Solvent B: 90 % MeOH/water with 0.2 % H3PO4, gradient with 0- 100 % B over 4 minutes): 3.09 minutes.

1-D-l. Ethyl 3 -phenyl -4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylate

Figure imgf000057_0001

(Z/E)-Ethyl 2-bromo-4,4,4-trifluorobut-2-enoate, l-D-3, (39.7 g, 161 mmol) and N-hydroxybenzimidoyl chloride (30 g, 193mmol) were dissolved in ethyl acetate (15OmL). Indium (III) chloride (8.89 g, 40.2mmol) was added and the resulting mixture stirred for 60 minutes at RT under N2. Potassium hydrogen carbonate (32.2 g, 321mmol) was added to the reaction mixture which was allowed to stir overnight for 14 hours at RT. The solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was re-suspended in 30OmL hexane and stirred for lOmiutes then filtered. The filter cake was washed with hexane (3X3 OmL) and the combined filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to give crude product, which was further purified with flash chromatography to generate 33g product (72%) as light yellowish oil as a mixture of the desired isomer 1-D-l and undesired isomer 1-D-la in a ratio of -30/1. MS m/e 286.06(M+H+); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.56 (m, 5H), 4.53 (q, 2H, J= 7.3 Hz), 1.46 (t, 3H, J= 7.2 Hz); HPLC (XBridge 5μ C18 4.6×50 mm, 4 mL/min, Solvent A: 10 % MeOH/water with 0.2 % H3PO4, Solvent B: 90 % MeOH/water with 0.2 % H3PO4, gradient with 0-100 % B over 4 minutes): 3.57 minutes.

Alt.1-D. 3-Phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid, lithium salt

Figure imgf000057_0002

A mixture of ethyl 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylate, 1-D-l, (0.085 g, 0.298 mmol) and lithium hydroxide hydrate (0.013 g, 0.298 mmol) in methanol (2.0 mL) and water (1.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated to dryness to give 3-phenyl-4- (trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid, lithium salt (0.079 g, 0.299 mmol, 100 % yield) as a pale yellow solid. The compound had an HPLC ret. time = 1.72 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 = 258.0. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.49 – 7.57 (m, 3H) and 7.58 – 7.62 (m, 2H).1-E. 3-Phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carbonyl fluoride

Figure imgf000058_0001

To a mixture of 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylic acid (3.00 g, 11.7 mmol) and pyridine (1.132 mL, 14.0 mmol) in dichloromethane (100 mL) at room temperature was added 2,4,6-trifluoro-l,3,5-triazine (cyanuric fluoride) (1.18 mL, 14.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight, diluted with dichloromethane (300 mL), washed with an ice-cold solution of 0.5N aqueous hydrochloric acid (2 x 100 mL), and the organic layer was collected. The aqueous layer was back-extracted with dichloromethane (200 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated to afford 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carbonyl fluoride (2.91 g, 11.2 mmol, 96 % yield) as a yellow, viscous oil. The product was found to react readily with methanol and on analysis was characterized as the methyl ester, which had an HPLC ret. time = 2.56 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 = 272.3 (methyl ester).1-F. tert-Butyl l-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)-l,2,4-oxadiazol- 3-yl)-benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylate

Figure imgf000059_0001

A suspension of 3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carbonyl fluoride (2.91 g, 11.2 mmol), (Z)-tert-butyl 1-(4-(N’- hydroxycarbamimidoyl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylate (Int. l, 3.43 g, 11.2 mmol), and Hunig’s Base (2.55 mL, 14.6 mmol) in acetonitrile (20 mL) was stirred at room temperature over the weekend. The reaction mixture had completely solidified (pinkish-tan in color), but was judged complete by HPLC and LCMS. The reaction mixture was partitioned between a saturated aqueous of sodium bicarbonate (150 mL) and dichloromethane (150 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane (2 x 100 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded a tan solid which was purified by flash silica gel chromatography using a mixture of ethyl acetate in hexane (0-50%) to afford tert-butyl l-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) isoxazol-5-yl)-l,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylate (4.60 g; 78%) as a white, crystalline solid. The material was suspended in methanol (-75 mL) and was sonicated for 5 minutes. The MeOH was removed under reduce pressure, and the residue was re-suspended in methanol (-50 mL) with sonication. Vacuum filtration and drying afforded tert-butyl l-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)- l,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylate (4.04 g, 7.67 mmol, 68 % yield) as a white, crystalline solid. The methanol filtrate was concentrated to afford additional tert-butyl l-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)- 1,2,4- oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylate (570 mg; 10%) as a slightly off- white solid. The compound had an HPLC retention time = 3.12 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 =527.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 1.47 (s, 9H) 3.28 – 3.37 (m, 3H), 3.60 (br. s., 2H), 3.74 (br. s., 2H), 7.49 (d, J=7.70 Hz, 2H), 7.53 – 7.62 (m, 3H), 7.69 (d, J=7.15 Hz, 2H), and 8.16 (d, J=7.70 Hz, 2H). 1. Preparation of l-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)-l,2,4- oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylic acid

A mixture of tert-butyl l-(4-(5-(3-phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5- yl)-l,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylate (6.12 g, 11.6 mmol) and trifluoroacetic acid (50.1 mL, 651 mmol) was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 h. By HPLC, the deprotection appeared to be complete after 1 h. The TFA was removed under reduced pressure, and the oily residue was diluted with water (100 mL) and sonicated for 5 min. The resulting suspension was stirred for an additional 10 min until a consistent white suspension was observed. A IN aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was added portion-wise until the pH was ~4.5 (42 mL of IN NaOH). Over time, the pH drifted back down to 3-4, and additional IN aqueous sodium hydroxide had to be added. The suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature. Several drops of IN aqueous sodium hydroxide were added to re-adjust the pH to 4.5, and after 60 min., the pH appeared to be stable. The solid was collected by vacuum filtration, washed with water several times, and dried under reduced pressure for 5 h. The solid was then suspended in methanol (110 mL) in a 150 mL round bottom flask and sonicated for 15 min. During the sonication, the solution became very thick. An additional 25 mL of methanol was added, and the suspension was stirred overnight. The product was collected by vacuum filtration, washed with methanol (-50 mL), and dried under reduced pressure. The solid was transferred to a 250 mL round bottom flask, re-suspended in methanol (115 mL), sonicated for 5 min., and stirred for 60 min. The solid was collected by vacuum filtration, washed with methanol (~50 mL), and dried over well under reduced pressure to give l-(4-(5-(3- phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazol-5-yl)-l,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)azetidine-3- carboxylic acid (5.06 g, 10.7 mmol, 92 % yield) as a crystalline, white solid. The product had an HPLC ret. time = 2.79 min. – Column: CHROMOLITH® SpeedROD 4.6 x 50 mm (4 min.); Solvent A = 10% MeOH, 90% H2O, 0.1% TFA; Solvent B = 90% MeOH, 10% H2O, 0.1% TFA. LC/MS M+1 = 471.3. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 3.20 – 3.46 (m, 5H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 7.53 (d, J=8.25 Hz, 2H), 7.60 – 7.70 (m, 5H), and 8.06 (d, J=7.70 Hz, 2H).

HPLC purity 100/99.8%, ret. time = 7.62 min. (A linear gradient using 5% acetonitrile, 95% water, and 0.05% TFA (Solvent A) and 95% acetonitrile, 5% water, and 0.05% TFA (Solvent B); t = 0 min., 10% B, t = l2 min., 100% B (15 min.) was employed on a SunFire C18 3.5u 4.6 x 150 mm column. Flow rate was 2 ml/min and UV detection was set to 220/254 nm.).

HPLC purity 100/99.9%, ret. time = 8.45 min. (A linear gradient using 5% acetonitrile, 95% water, and 0.05% TFA (Solvent A) and 95% acetonitrile, 5% water, and 0.05% TFA (Solvent B); t = 0 min., 10% B, t = l2 min., 100% B (15 min.) was employed on a XBridge Ph 3.5u 4.6 x 150 mm column. Flow rate was 2 ml/min and UV detection was set to 220/254 nm.).

CONSTRUCTION

Figure imgf000049_0002

Figure imgf000050_0001

Figure imgf000051_0001

 

Figure imgf000055_0001

Alt.1 -D- 1. Ethyl 3 -phenyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylate

Figure imgf000055_0002

Figure imgf000057_0001

Figure imgf000057_0002

Figure imgf000058_0001
Figure imgf000059_0001
Figure imgf000049_0001

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is the endogenous ligand for the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (S1P1–5) and evokes a variety of cellular responses through their stimulation. The interaction of S1P with the S1P receptors plays a fundamental physiological role in a number of processes including vascular development and stabilization, lymphocyte migration, and proliferation

REFERENCES

Watterson, S. H.; Guo, J.; Spergel, S. H.; Langevine, C. L.; Moquin, R. V.; Shen, D.
R.; Yarde, M.; Cvijic, M. E.; Banas, D.; Liu, R.; Suchard, S. J.; Gillooly, K.; Taylor,
T.; Rex-Rabe, S.; Shuster, D. J.; McIntyre, K. W.; Cornelius, G.; Darienzo, C.;
Marino, A.; Balimane, P.; Warrack, B.; Saltercid, L.; McKinnon, M.; Barrish, J. C.;
Carter, P. C.; Pitts, W. J.; Xie, J.; Dyckman, D. J. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 2820.

Watterson, S.H.; Guo, J.; Spergel, S.H.; et al.
Potent and selective agonists of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate 1 (S1P1): The discovery and SAR of a novel isoxazole based series
241st Am Chem Soc (ACS) Natl Meet (March 27-30, Anaheim) 2011, Abst MEDI 96

 

/////Potent and Selective Isoxazole-Containing S1P1 Receptor Agonist, BMS 520, Sphingosine-1-Phosphate 1 (S1P1)

O=C(C1CN(CC2=CC=C(C3=NOC(C4=C(C(F)(F)F)C(C5=CC=CC=C5)=NO4)=N3)C=C2)C1)O

Share

Optimization, Production, and Characterization of a CpG-Oligonucleotide-Ficoll Conjugate Nanoparticle Adjuvant for Enhanced Immunogenicity of Anthrax Protective Antigen

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Optimization, Production, and Characterization of a CpG-Oligonucleotide-Ficoll Conjugate Nanoparticle Adjuvant for Enhanced Immunogenicity of Anthrax Protective Antigen
May 132016
 

Abstract Image

We have synthesized and characterized a novel phosphorothioate CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODN)-Ficoll conjugated nanoparticulate adjuvant, termed DV230-Ficoll. This adjuvant was constructed from an amine-functionalized-Ficoll, a heterobifunctional linker (succinimidyl-[(N-maleimidopropionamido)-hexaethylene glycol] ester) and the CpG-ODN DV230. Herein, we describe the evaluation of the purity and reactivity of linkers of different lengths for CpG-ODN-Ficoll conjugation, optimization of linker coupling, and conjugation of thiol-functionalized CpG to maleimide-functionalized Ficoll and process scale-up. Physicochemical characterization of independently produced lots of DV230-Ficoll reveal a bioconjugate with a particle size of approximately 50 nm and covalent attachment of more than 100 molecules of CpG per Ficoll. Solutions of purified DV230-Ficoll were stable for at least 12 months at frozen and refrigerated temperatures and stability was further enhanced in lyophilized form. Compared to nonconjugated monomeric DV230, the DV230-Ficoll conjugate demonstrated improved in vitro potency for induction of IFN-α from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and induced higher titer neutralizing antibody responses against coadministered anthrax recombinant protective antigen in mice. The processes described here establish a reproducible and robust process for the synthesis of a novel, size-controlled, and stable CpG-ODN nanoparticle adjuvant suitable for manufacture and use in vaccines.

READ……http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00107

Optimization, Production, and Characterization of a CpG-Oligonucleotide-Ficoll Conjugate Nanoparticle Adjuvant for Enhanced Immunogenicity of Anthrax Protective Antigen

Dynavax Technologies Corporation, 2929 Seventh Street, Suite 100, Berkeley, California 94710, United States
MedImmune LLC, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, United States
Bioconjugate Chem., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00107
Publication Date (Web): April 13, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society
*E-mail: bmilley@dynavax.com. Phone: (510) 665-7227. Fax: (510) 848-1327.

ACS Editors’ Choice – This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

//////Optimization, Production, Characterization,  CpG-Oligonucleotide-Ficoll Conjugate Nanoparticle Adjuvant,  Enhanced Immunogenicity, Anthrax Protective Antigen

Share

Solvates, Salts, and Cocrystals: A Proposal for a Feasible Classification System

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Solvates, Salts, and Cocrystals: A Proposal for a Feasible Classification System
May 132016
 
Abstract Image

The design of pharmaceutical cocrystals has initiated widespread debate on the classification of cocrystals. Current attempts to classify multicomponent crystals suffer from ambiguity, which has led to inconsistent definitions for cocrystals and for multicomponent crystals in general. Inspired by the work of Aitipamula et al. (Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 2147–2152), we present a feasible classification system for all multicomponent crystals. The present classification enables us to analyze and classify multicomponent crystal structures present in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). This reveals that all seven classes proposed are relevant in terms of frequency of occurrence. Lists of CSD refcodes for all classes are provided. We identified over 5000 cocrystals in the CSD, as well as over 12 000 crystals with more than two components. This illustrates that the possibilities for alternative drug formulations can be increased significantly by considering more than two components in drug design.

READ ………….http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00200

Solvates, Salts, and Cocrystals: A Proposal for a Feasible Classification System

Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Continuous Manufacturing and Crystallisation, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Technology and Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, 99 George Street, Glasgow G1 1RD, United Kingdom
Cryst. Growth Des., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00200
Publication Date (Web): April 21, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

ACS Editors’ Choice – This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

Synopsis

A classification system for multicomponent crystals is applied to the organic crystals in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) in an attempt to reveal the population of structures within each subclass. Seven subclasses of multicomponent crystals are presented, each illustrated by an example of an isonicotinamide crystal structure that can be found in the CSD.

 

//////////Solvates, Salts, Cocrystals, Proposal,  Feasible Classification System

Share

Teslaphoresis of Carbon Nanotubes

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Teslaphoresis of Carbon Nanotubes
May 132016
 
Abstract Image

This paper introduces Teslaphoresis, the directed motion and self-assembly of matter by a Tesla coil, and studies this electrokinetic phenomenon using single-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Conventional directed self-assembly of matter using electric fields has been restricted to small scale structures, but with Teslaphoresis, we exceed this limitation by using the Tesla coil’s antenna to create a gradient high-voltage force field that projects into free space. CNTs placed within the Teslaphoretic (TEP) field polarize and self-assemble into wires that span from the nanoscale to the macroscale, the longest thus far being 15 cm. We show that the TEP field not only directs the self-assembly of long nanotube wires at remote distances (>30 cm) but can also wirelessly power nanotube-based LED circuits. Furthermore, individualized CNTs self-organize to form long parallel arrays with high fidelity alignment to the TEP field. Thus, Teslaphoresis is effective for directed self-assembly from the bottom-up to the macroscale.

SEE………..http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsnano.6b02313

Teslaphoresis of Carbon Nanotubes

Department of Chemistry, Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, §Smalley-Curl Institute, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77005, United States
Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of Tennessee—Chattanooga, 615 McCallie Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37403, United States
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, 101 Bizzell Street, College Station, Texas 77843,United States
# Second Baptist School, 6410 Woodway Drive, Houston, Texas 77057, United States
ACS Nano, 2016, 10 (4), pp 4873–4881
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b02313
Publication Date (Web): April 13, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

ACS Editors’ Choice – This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

 

 

/////////

Share

Palladium- and Nickel-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Fluorosulfonates

 spectroscopy, SYNTHESIS  Comments Off on Palladium- and Nickel-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Fluorosulfonates
May 132016
 
Abstract Image

Examples of the palladium- and nickel-catalyzed amination of aryl fluorosulfonates with aromatic and alkyl amines are described. Aniline is coupled to a diverse series of aryl fluorosulfonates catalyzed by the combination of CpPd(cinammyl) and Xantphos, and the relative reactivity of aryl fluorosulfonates to undergo Pd-catalyzed amination was compared with other common aryl electrophiles. In addition, we report the direct amination of a phenol by in situ formation of an aryl fluorosulfonate by reaction with sulfuryl fluoride and base followed by subsequent amination to form a new C–N bond. Finally, we report examples of the nickel-catalyzed amination of aryl fluorosulfonates catalyzed by the combination of Ni(COD)2 and DPPF in the presence of MeCN. The high reactivity of the aryl fluorosulfonate electrophile with generic palladium and nickel catalyst systems, combined with its simple preparation from sulfuryl fluoride will enable commercial amination reactions of abundant phenolic raw materials.

SEE…….http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acscatal.6b00865

Palladium- and Nickel-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Fluorosulfonates

The Dow Chemical Company, Core R&D, Midland, Michigan 48674, United States
ACS Catal., 2016, 6, pp 3515–3519
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00865
Publication Date (Web): April 27, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

ACS Editors’ Choice – This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

STR1

STR1 STR2

////Palladium, Nickel-Catalyzed , Amination , Aryl Fluorosulfonates

Share

Dihydrobenzofuran Neolignans

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Dihydrobenzofuran Neolignans
May 132016
 

Figure 1 Structures of dihydrobenzofuran neolignans 2a and 2b

Scheme 1 (i) Ag2O, (CH3)2CO:C6H6 3:5, r.t., 20 h (2a: 36% yield; 2b: 43% yield). 

Figure 3  Main nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) correlations observed in the nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) spectra of compounds 2a and 2b

Table 1 1H and 13C NMR data assignments for compound 2a (400 MHz, CDCl3

δCa δH (integral, multiplicityb), J/ Hz
1 132.0 (C)
2=6 127.5 (CH) 7.27 (2H, ddd, J2,5 = J6,3 0.3, J2,7 = J6,7 0.6, J2,3 = J6,5 8.3)
3=5 115.7 (CH) 6.84 (2H, dd, J3,6 = J5,2 0.3, J3,2 = J5,6 8.3)
4 156.1 (C)
7 87.7 (CH) 6.09 (1H, dt, J7,2 = J7,6 0.6, J7,8 7.2)
8 55.1 (CH) 4.27 (1H, dd, J8,6′ 1.4, J8,7 7.2)
9 170.9 (C)
10 52.9 (CH3) 3.83 (3H, s)
1′ 127.8 (C)
2′ 130.8 (CH) 7.43 (1H, ddd, J2′,7‘ 1.1, J2′,6′ 2.0, J2′,3′ 8.3)
3′ 110.3 (CH) 6.89 (1H, dd, J3′,6′ 0.4, J3′,2′8.3)
4′ 161.2 (C)
5′ 125.1 (C)
6′ 124.9 (CH) 7.55 (1H, dddd, J6′,3′ 0.4, J6′,7′ 0.7, J6′,8 1.4, J6′,2′2.0)
7′ 144.7 (CH) 7.66 (1H, ddd, J7′,6′ 0.7, J7′,2′ 1.1, J7′,8′ 15.9)
8′ 115.2 (CH) 6.32 (1H, d, J8′,7′ 15.9)
9′ 167.9 (C)
10′ 51.7 (CH3) 3.81 (3H, s)

aMultiplicities assigned on the basis of distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT) 135 experiments;

bmultiplicities and coupling constant values measured within 1H NMR and J-resolved spectra with the help from1H-1H correlation spectroscopy (COSY) results.

Table 2 2D NMR data for compound 2a (400 MHz, CDCl3

C H gCOSYa gHMBCb gHMQCc NOESYd
1 H3 =H5, H7, H8
2=6 2=6 H3, H5, H7 H3 =H5, H7 H2=H6 H7, H8
3=5 3=5 H2, H6 H5 H3=H5
4 H3 =H5, H2 =H6
7 7 H2=H6, H8 H6, H8 H7 H2=H6*
8 8 H7, H6′ H7, H6′ H8 H2=H6, H6′*
9 H7, H8, H10
10 10 H10
1′ H3′, H8′
2′ 2′ H3′, H6′, H7′ H6′, H7′ H2′ H7′, H8′*
3′ 3′ H2′, H6′ H3′
4′ H2′, H3′, H6′, H7, H8
5′ H8, H3′
6′ 6′ H2′, H3′, H7′, H8 H2′, H7′, H8 H6′ H8′, H7′, H8*
7′ 7′ H2′, H8′, H6′ H2′, H6′, H8′ H7′ H6′*, H2′
8′ 8′ H7′ H7′ H8′ H6′*, H2′
9′ H7′, H8′, H10′
10′ 10′ H10′

bgradient-selected heteronuclear multiple bond coherence;
cgradient-selected heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence;
dnuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy.
*mean weak correlation.

aGradient-selected correlation spectroscopy;

Table 3 1H and 13C NMR data assignments for compound 2b (400 MHz, acetone-d6

δCa δH (integral, multiplicityb); J/ Hz
1 132.5 (C)
2 111.2 (CH) 7.10 (1H, ddd, J2,5 0.3, J2,7 0.8, J2,6 2.1)
3 149.1 (C)
4 148.5 (C)
5 116.3 (CH) 6.84 (1H, dd, J5,2 0.3, J5,6 8.3)
6 120.7 (CH) 6.92 (1H, ddd, J6,7 0.6, J6,2 2.1, J6,5 8.3)
7 88.8 (CH) 6.04 (1H, ddd, J7,6 0.6, J7,2 0.8, J7,8 7.3)
8 57.0 (CH) 4.47 (1H, dd, J8,6′ 1.4, J8,7 7.3)
9 172.1 (C=O)
10 53.5 (CH3) 3.81 (3H, s)
11 56.4 (CH3) 3.84 (3H, s)
1′ 129.9 (C)
2′ 113.9 (CH) 7.33 (1H, dd, J2′,7′ 0.4, J2’6′ 2.6)
3′ 146.3 (C)
4′ 151.5 (C)
5′ 127.8 (C)
6′ 119.5 (CH) 7.29 (1H, ddd, J6′,7′ 0.8, J6′,8 1.4, J6′,2′ 2.6)
7′ 145.9 (CH) 7.63 (1H, ddd, J7′,2′ 0.4, J7′,6′ 0.8, J7′,8′ 15.8)
8′ 116.8 (CH) 6.44 (1H, d, J8′,7′ 15.8)
9′ 168.2 (C)
10′ 52.1 (CH3) 3.73 (3H, s)
11′ 56.8 (CH3) 3.92 (3H, s)

aMultiplicities assigned on the basis of distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT) 135 experiments;
bmultiplicities and coupling constant values measured within 1H-NMR and J-resolved spectra with the help from1H-1H correlation spectroscopy (COSY) results.

Table 4 2D NMR data for compound 2b (400 MHz, acetone-d6

C H gCOSYa gHMBCb gHMQCc NOESYd
1 H2, H6, H7, H8
2 2 H5, H6, H7 H5, H6, H7 H2 H7, H8, H11
3 H2, H5, H11 H3
4 H2, H5, H6
5 5 H2, H6 H6 H5
6 6 H2, H5, H7 H2, H5 H6 H7, H8
7 7 H2, H6, H8 H2, H6, H8 H7 H6*, H2
8 8 H6′, H7 H2, H6′ H8 H6′*, H2, H6
9 H7, H8, H10 H9
10 10 H10
11 11 H11 H2
1′ H7′, H8′ H1′
2′ 2′ H6′, H7′ H6′, H7′ H2′ H7′, H8′*, H11′
3′ H11′
4′ H2′, H6′, H7, H8
5′ H7, H8′
6′ 6′ H7′, H2′, H8 H2′, H7′, H8 H6′ H8′, H7′, H8*
7′ 7′ H2′, H6′, H8′ H2′, H6′, H8′ H7′ H6′, H2′,
8′ 8′ H7′ H7′ H8′ H6′, H2′
9′ H8′, H10′
10′ 10′ H10′
11′ 11′ H11′ H2′

aGradient-selected correlation spectroscopy;
bgradient-selected heteronuclear multiple bond coherence;
cgradient-selected heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence;
dnuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy.
*mean weak correlation.

1H and 13C NMR data previously reported for compound2a and 2b were obtained in CDCl3 or acetone-d6. Most of the signals in the 1H NMR spectrum were between δH 6.0 and δH 8.0, but the hydrogen signal multiplicities are ambiguous. In this work, we found that for compound2a in acetone-d6, the signals at δH 7.6-7.7 are referred to four hydrogen atoms and their overlapping precluded their correct assignment (Figure 2). Therefore, CDCl3 provided much clearer spectra for 2a, but not for 2b, due to the solvent influence on chemical shifts. For compound 2b, three hydrogen atoms resonate at δH 6.91 in the 1H HMR spectrum in CDCl3. On the other hand, the 1H NMR signals of 2b were resolved by using acetone-d6 as solvent, which allowed verification of the multiplicities, observation of the chemical shifts and measurement of the coupling constants.

Figure 2 Expansions of the 1H NMR spectrum of compounds 2a and 2b obtained in CDCl3 and acetone-d6

 

Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society

On-line version ISSN 1678-4790

J. Braz. Chem. Soc. vol.27 no.1 São Paulo Jan. 2016

http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-5053.20150262

ARTICLES

Detailed 1H and 13C NMR Spectral Data Assignment for Two Dihydrobenzofuran Neolignans

Talita C. T. Medeirosa  #, Herbert J. Diasa  #, Eliane O. Silvaa  , Murilo J. Fukuib  , Ana Carolina F. Soaresb  , Tapas Karc  , Vladimir C. G. Helenob  , Paulo M. Donatea  , Renato L. T. Parreirab  , Antônio E. M. Crottia  * 

aDepartamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil

bNúcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade de Franca, 14404-600 Franca-SP, Brazil

cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Utah State University, 84322-0300 Logan-UT, United States

ABSTRACT

In this work we present a complete proton (1H) and carbon 13 (13C) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectral analysis of two synthetic dihydrofuran neolignans (±)-trans-dehydrodicoumarate dimethyl ester and (±)-trans-dehydrodiferulate dimethyl ester. Unequivocal assignments were achieved by 1H NMR, proton decoupled 13C (13C{1H}) NMR spectra, gradient-selected correlation spectroscopy (gCOSY), J-resolved, gradient-selected heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (gHMQC), gradient-selected heteronuclear multiple bond coherence (gHMBC) and nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) experiments. All hydrogen coupling constants were measured, clarifying all the hydrogen signals multiplicities. Computational methods were also used to simulate the 1H and 13C chemical shifts and showed good agreement with the transconfiguration of the substituents at C7 and C8.

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532016000100136&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

Key words: neolignans,  oxidative coupling,  J-resolved,  benzofurans

STR1

 

STR1

 

 

STR1

see……….0103-5053-jbchs-27-01-0136-suppl01.pdf

//////////////

Share

Printing with Collagen

 drugs  Comments Off on Printing with Collagen
May 132016
 

thumbnail image: Printing with Collagen

Printing with Collagen

Addition of collagen to hydrogels in 3D printing improves stem cell differentiation in osteogenesis

Read more

http://www.chemistryviews.org/details/news/9268521/Printing_with_Collagen.html

 

MORE ON

Collagen

Tropocollagen molecule: three left-handed procollagens (red, green, blue) join to form a right handed triple helical tropocollagen.

Collagen is the most common protein found in mammals.

Collagen /ˈkɒlən/ is the main structural protein in the extracellular space in the various connective tissues in animal bodies. As the main component of connective tissue, it is the most abundant protein in mammals,[1] making up from 25% to 35% of the whole-body protein content. Depending upon the degree of mineralization, collagen tissues may be rigid (bone), compliant (tendon), or have a gradient from rigid to compliant (cartilage).[2] Collagen, in the form of elongated fibrils, is mostly found in fibrous tissues such as tendons, ligaments and skin. It is also abundant incorneas, cartilage, bones, blood vessels, the gut, intervertebral discs and the dentin in teeth.[3] In muscle tissue, it serves as a major component of the endomysium. Collagen constitutes one to two percent of muscle tissue, and accounts for 6% of the weight of strong, tendinous muscles.[4] Thefibroblast is the most common cell that creates collagen.

Gelatin, which is used in food and industry, is collagen that has been irreversibly hydrolyzed.[5] Collagen also has many medical uses in treating complications of the bones and skin.

The name collagen comes from the Greek κόλλα (kólla), meaning “glue“, and suffix -γέν, -gen, denoting “producing”.[6][7] This refers to the compound’s early use in the process of boiling the skin and sinews of horses and other animals to obtain glue.

 

 

woman receiving injection to forehead
Collagen injections can be used in cosmetic procedures to improve the contours of aging skin.

Types of collagen

Collagen occurs in many places throughout the body. Over 90% of the collagen in the human body, however, is type I.[8]

So far, 28 types of collagen have been identified and described. They can be divided into several groups according to the structure they form:[2]

  • Fibrillar (Type I, II, III, V, XI)
  • Non-fibrillar
    • FACIT (Fibril Associated Collagens with Interrupted Triple Helices) (Type IX, XII, XIV, XVI, XIX)
    • Short chain (Type VIII, X)
    • Basement membrane (Type IV)
    • Multiplexin (Multiple Triple Helix domains with Interruptions) (Type XV, XVIII)
    • MACIT (Membrane Associated Collagens with Interrupted Triple Helices) (Type XIII, XVII)
    • Other (Type VI, VII)

The five most common types are:

  • Type I: skin, tendon, vascular ligature, organs, bone (main component of the organic part of bone)
  • Type II: cartilage (main collagenous component of cartilage)
  • Type III: reticulate (main component of reticular fibers), commonly found alongside type I.
  • Type IV: forms basal lamina, the epithelium-secreted layer of the basement membrane.
  • Type V: cell surfaces, hair and placenta

wrinkled mouth with cigarette
Tobacco contains chemicals that damage collagen

Medical uses

Cardiac applications

The collagenous cardiac skeleton which includes the four heart valve rings, is histologically and uniquely bound to cardiac muscle. The cardiac skeleton also includes the separating septa of the heart chambers – the interventricular septum and the atrioventricular septum. Collagen contribution to the measure of cardiac performance summarily represents a continuous torsional force opposed to the fluid mechanics of blood pressure emitted from the heart. The collagenous structure that divides the upper chambers of the heart from the lower chambers is an impermeable membrane that excludes both blood and electrical impulses through typical physiological means. With support from collagen, atrial fibrillation should never deteriorate to ventricular fibrillation. Collagen is layered in variable densities with cardiac muscle mass. The mass, distribution, age and density of collagen all contribute to the compliance required to move blood back and forth. Individual cardiac valvular leaflets are folded into shape by specialized collagen under variable pressure. Gradual calcium deposition within collagen occurs as a natural function of aging. Calcified points within collagen matrices show contrast in a moving display of blood and muscle, enabling methods of cardiac imaging technology to arrive at ratios essentially stating blood in (cardiac input) and blood out (cardiac output). Pathology of the collagen underpinning of the heart is understood within the category of connective tissue disease.

Hydrolyzed type II collagen and osteoarthritis

A published study[9] reports that ingestion of a novel low molecular weight hydrolyzed chicken sternal cartilage extract, containing a matrix of hydrolyzed type II collagen,chondroitin sulfate, and hyaluronic acid, relieves joint discomfort associated with osteoarthritis. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling 80 subjects demonstrated that it was well tolerated with no serious adverse event and led to a significant improvement in joint mobility compared to the placebo group on days 35 (p = 0.007) and 70 (p < 0.001).

 

Fast facts on collagen

Here are some key points about collagen. More detail and supporting information is in the main article.25-27

  • Protein makes up around 20% of the body’s mass, and collagen makes up around 30% of the protein in the human body.
  • There are at least 16 types of collagen, but 80-90% of the collagen in the body consists of types I, II, and III.
  • Type I collagen fibrils are stronger than steel (gram for gram).
  • Collagen is most commonly found within the body in the skin, bones and connective tissues.
  • The word “collagen” is derived from the Greek “kolla,” meaning glue.
  • Collagen gives the skin its strength and structure, and also plays a role in the replacement of dead skin cells.
  • Collagen production declines with age (as part of intrinsic aging), and is reduced by exposure to ultraviolet light and other environmental factors (extrinsic aging).
  • Collagen in medical products can be derived from human, bovine, porcine and ovine sources.
  • Collagen dressings attract new skin cells to wound sites.
  • Cosmetic products such as revitalizing lotions that claim to increase collagen levels are unlikely to do so, as collagen molecules are too large to be absorbed through the skin.
  • Collagen production can be stimulated through the use of laser therapy and the use of all-trans retinoic acid (a form ofvitamin A).
  • Controllable factors that damage the production of collagen include sunlight, smoking and high sugar consumption.

Cosmetic surgery

Collagen has been widely used in cosmetic surgery, as a healing aid for burn patients for reconstruction of bone and a wide variety of dental, orthopedic, and surgical purposes. Both human and bovine collagen is widely used as dermal fillers for treatment of wrinkles and skin aging.[10] Some points of interest are:

  1. When used cosmetically, there is a chance of allergic reactions causing prolonged redness; however, this can be virtually eliminated by simple and inconspicuous patch testing prior to cosmetic use.
  2. Most medical collagen is derived from young beef cattle (bovine) from certified BSE-free animals. Most manufacturers use donor animals from either “closed herds”, or from countries which have never had a reported case of BSE such as Australia, Brazil, and New Zealand.

Bone grafts

As the skeleton forms the structure of the body, it is vital that it maintains its strength, even after breaks and injuries. Collagen is used in bone grafting as it has a triple helical structure, making it a very strong molecule. It is ideal for use in bones, as it does not compromise the structural integrity of the skeleton. The triple helical structure of collagen prevents it from being broken down by enzymes, it enables adhesiveness of cells and it is important for the proper assembly of the extracellular matrix.[11]

Tissue regeneration

Collagen scaffolds are used in tissue regeneration, whether in sponges, thin sheets, or gels. Collagen has the correct properties for tissue regeneration such as pore structure, permeability, hydrophilicity and it is stable in vivo. Collagen scaffolds are also ideal for the deposition of cells, such as osteoblasts and fibroblasts and once inserted, growth is able to continue as normal in the tissue.[12]

Reconstructive surgical uses

Collagens are widely employed in the construction of the artificial skin substitutes used in the management of severe burns. These collagens may be derived from bovine, equine, porcine, or even human sources; and are sometimes used in combination with silicones, glycosaminoglycans, fibroblasts, growth factors and other substances.

Collagen is also sold commercially in pill form as a supplement to aid joint mobility. However, because proteins are broken down into amino acids before absorption, there is no reason for orally ingested collagen to affect connective tissue in the body, except through the effect of individual amino acid supplementation.

Collagen is also frequently used in scientific research applications for cell culture, studying cell behavior and cellular interactions with the extracellular environment.[13]

Wound care

Collagen is one of the body’s key natural resources and a component of skin tissue that can benefit all stages of the wound healing process.[14] When collagen is made available to the wound bed, closure can occur. Wound deterioration, followed sometimes by procedures such as amputation, can thus be avoided.

Collagen is a natural product, therefore it is used as a natural wound dressing and has properties that artificial wound dressings do not have. It is resistant against bacteria, which is of vital importance in a wound dressing. It helps to keep the wound sterile, because of its natural ability to fight infection. When collagen is used as a burn dressing, healthygranulation tissue is able to form very quickly over the burn, helping it to heal rapidly.[15]

Throughout the 4 phases of wound healing, collagen performs the following functions in wound healing:

  • Guiding function: Collagen fibers serve to guide fibroblasts. Fibroblasts migrate along a connective tissue matrix.
  • Chemotactic properties: The large surface area available on collagen fibers can attract fibrogenic cells which help in healing.
  • Nucleation: Collagen, in the presence of certain neutral salt molecules can act as a nucleating agent causing formation of fibrillar structures. A collagen wound dressing might serve as a guide for orienting new collagen deposition and capillary growth.
  • Hemostatic properties: Blood platelets interact with the collagen to make a hemostatic plug.

Chemistry

The collagen protein is composed of a triple helix, which generally consists of two identical chains (α1) and an additional chain that differs slightly in its chemical composition (α2).[16] The amino acid composition of collagen is atypical for proteins, particularly with respect to its high hydroxyproline content. The most common motifs in the amino acid sequence of collagen are glycineproline-X and glycine-X-hydroxyproline, where X is any amino acid other than glycine, proline or hydroxyproline. The average amino acid composition for fish and mammal skin is given.[16]

Amino acid Abundance in mammal skin
(residues/1000)
Abundance in fish skin
(residues/1000)
Glycine 329 339
Proline 126 108
Alanine 109 114
Hydroxyproline 95 67
Glutamic acid 74 76
Arginine 49 52
Aspartic acid 47 47
Serine 36 46
Lysine 29 26
Leucine 24 23
Valine 22 21
Threonine 19 26
Phenylalanine 13 14
Isoleucine 11 11
Hydroxylysine 6 8
Methionine 6 13
Histidine 5 7
Tyrosine 3 3
Cysteine 1 1
Tryptophan 0 0

Synthesis

First, a three-dimensional stranded structure is assembled, with the amino acids glycine and proline as its principal components. This is not yet collagen but its precursor, procollagen. Procollagen is then modified by the addition of hydroxyl groups to the amino acids proline and lysine. This step is important for later glycosylation and the formation of the triple helix structure of collagen. The hydroxylase enzymes that perform these reactions require Vitamin C as a cofactor, and a deficiency in this vitamin results in impaired collagen synthesis and the resulting disease scurvy[17] These hydroxylation reactions are catalyzed by two different enzymes: prolyl-4-hydroxylase[18] and lysyl-hydroxylase. Vitamin C also serves with them in inducing these reactions. In this service, one molecule of vitamin C is destroyed for each H replaced by OH. [19] The synthesis of collagen occurs inside and outside of the cell. The formation of collagen which results in fibrillary collagen (most common form) is discussed here. Meshwork collagen, which is often involved in the formation of filtration systems, is the other form of collagen. All types of collagens are triple helices, and the differences lie in the make-up of the alpha peptides created in step 2.

  1. Transcription of mRNA: About 34 genes are associated with collagen formation, each coding for a specific mRNA sequence, and typically have the “COL” prefix. The beginning of collagen synthesis begins with turning on genes which are associated with the formation of a particular alpha peptide (typically alpha 1, 2 or 3).
  2. Pre-pro-peptide formation: Once the final mRNA exits from the cell nucleus and enters into the cytoplasm, it links with the ribosomal subunits and the process of translation occurs. The early/first part of the new peptide is known as the signal sequence. The signal sequence on the N-terminal of the peptide is recognized by a signal recognition particle on the endoplasmic reticulum, which will be responsible for directing the pre-pro-peptide into the endoplasmic reticulum. Therefore, once the synthesis of new peptide is finished, it goes directly into the endoplasmic reticulum for post-translational processing. It is now known as pre-pro-collagen.
  3. Pre-pro-peptide to pro-collagen: Three modifications of the pre-pro-peptide occur leading to the formation of the alpha peptide:
    1. The signal peptide on the N-terminal is dissolved, and the molecule is now known as propeptide (not procollagen).
    2. Hydroxylation of lysines and prolines on propeptide by the enzymes ‘prolyl hydroxylase’ and ‘lysyl hydroxylase’ (to produce hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine) occurs to aid cross-linking of the alpha peptides. This enzymatic step requires vitamin C as a cofactor. In scurvy, the lack of hydroxylation of prolines and lysines causes a looser triple helix (which is formed by three alpha peptides).
    3. Glycosylation occurs by adding either glucose or galactose monomers onto the hydroxyl groups that were placed onto lysines, but not on prolines.
    4. Once these modifications have taken place, three of the hydroxylated and glycosylated propeptides twist into a triple helix forming procollagen. Procollagen still has unwound ends, which will be later trimmed. At this point, the procollagen is packaged into a transfer vesicle destined for the Golgi apparatus.
  4. Golgi apparatus modification: In the Golgi apparatus, the procollagen goes through one last post-translational modification before being secreted out of the cell. In this step, oligosaccharides (not monosaccharides as in step 3) are added, and then the procollagen is packaged into a secretory vesicle destined for the extracellular space.
  5. Formation of tropocollagen: Once outside the cell, membrane bound enzymes known as ‘collagen peptidases’, remove the “loose ends” of the procollagen molecule. What is left is known as tropocollagen. Defects in this step produce one of the many collagenopathies known as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. This step is absent when synthesizing type III, a type of fibrilar collagen.
  6. Formation of the collagen fibril: ‘Lysyl oxidase’, an extracellular enzyme, produces the final step in the collagen synthesis pathway. This enzyme acts on lysines and hydroxylysines producing aldehyde groups, which will eventually undergo covalent bonding between tropocollagen molecules. This polymer of tropocollogen is known as a collagen fibril.

Action of lysyl oxidase

Amino acids

Collagen has an unusual amino acid composition and sequence:

  • Glycine is found at almost every third residue.
  • Proline makes up about 17% of collagen.
  • Collagen contains two uncommon derivative amino acids not directly inserted during translation. These amino acids are found at specific locations relative to glycine and are modified post-translationally by different enzymes, both of which require vitamin C as acofactor.

Cortisol stimulates degradation of (skin) collagen into amino acids.[20]

Collagen I formation

Most collagen forms in a similar manner, but the following process is typical for type I:

  1. Inside the cell
    1. Two types of alpha chains are formed during translation on ribosomes along the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER): alpha-1 and alpha-2 chains. These peptide chains (known as preprocollagen) have registration peptides on each end and a signal peptide.
    2. Polypeptide chains are released into the lumen of the RER.
    3. Signal peptides are cleaved inside the RER and the chains are now known as pro-alpha chains.
    4. Hydroxylation of lysine and proline amino acids occurs inside the lumen. This process is dependent on ascorbic acid (vitamin C) as a cofactor.
    5. Glycosylation of specific hydroxylysine residues occurs.
    6. Triple alpha helical structure is formed inside the endoplasmic reticulum from two alpha-1 chains and one alpha-2 chain.
    7. Procollagen is shipped to the Golgi apparatus, where it is packaged and secreted by exocytosis.
  2. Outside the cell
    1. Registration peptides are cleaved and tropocollagen is formed by procollagen peptidase.
    2. Multiple tropocollagen molecules form collagen fibrils, via covalent cross-linking (aldol reaction) by lysyl oxidase which links hydroxylysine and lysine residues. Multiple collagen fibrils form into collagen fibers.
    3. Collagen may be attached to cell membranes via several types of protein, including fibronectin and integrin.

Synthetic pathogenesis

Vitamin C deficiency causes scurvy, a serious and painful disease in which defective collagen prevents the formation of strong connective tissue. Gums deteriorate and bleed, with loss of teeth; skin discolors, and wounds do not heal. Prior to the 18th century, this condition was notorious among long-duration military, particularly naval, expeditions during which participants were deprived of foods containing vitamin C.

An autoimmune disease such as lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis[21] may attack healthy collagen fibers.

Many bacteria and viruses secrete virulence factors, such as the enzyme collagenase, which destroys collagen or interferes with its production.

Molecular structure

A single collagen molecule, tropocollagen, is used to make up larger collagen aggregates, such as fibrils. It is approximately 300 nm long and 1.5 nm in diameter, and it is made up of three polypeptide strands (called alpha peptides, see step 2), each of which has the conformation of a left-handed helix – this should not be confused with the right-handedalpha helix. These three left-handed helices are twisted together into a right-handed triple helix or “super helix”, a cooperative quaternary structure stabilized by many hydrogen bonds. With type I collagen and possibly all fibrillar collagens, if not all collagens, each triple-helix associates into a right-handed super-super-coil referred to as the collagen microfibril. Each microfibril is interdigitated with its neighboring microfibrils to a degree that might suggest they are individually unstable, although within collagen fibrils, they are so well ordered as to be crystalline.

Three polypeptides coil to form tropocollagen. Many tropocollagens then bind together to form a fibril, and many of these then form a fibre.

A distinctive feature of collagen is the regular arrangement ofamino acids in each of the three chains of these collagen subunits. The sequence often follows the pattern GlyPro-X or Gly-X-Hyp, where X may be any of various other amino acid residues.[16] Proline or hydroxyproline constitute about 1/6 of the total sequence. With glycine accounting for the 1/3 of the sequence, this means approximately half of the collagen sequence is not glycine, proline or hydroxyproline, a fact often missed due to the distraction of the unusual GX1X2 character of collagen alpha-peptides. The high glycine content of collagen is important with respect to stabilization of the collagen helix as this allows the very close association of the collagen fibers within the molecule, facilitating hydrogen bonding and the formation of intermolecular cross-links.[16]This kind of regular repetition and high glycine content is found in only a few other fibrous proteins, such as silk fibroin.

Collagen is not only a structural protein. Due to its key role in the determination of cell phenotype, cell adhesion, tissue regulation and infrastructure, many sections of its non-proline-rich regions have cell or matrix association / regulation roles. The relatively high content of proline and hydroxyproline rings, with their geometrically constrained carboxyl and (secondary) amino groups, along with the rich abundance of glycine, accounts for the tendency of the individual polypeptide strands to form left-handed helices spontaneously, without any intrachain hydrogen bonding.

Because glycine is the smallest amino acid with no side chain, it plays a unique role in fibrous structural proteins. In collagen, Gly is required at every third position because the assembly of the triple helix puts this residue at the interior (axis) of the helix, where there is no space for a larger side group than glycine’s single hydrogen atom. For the same reason, the rings of the Pro and Hyp must point outward. These two amino acids help stabilize the triple helix—Hyp even more so than Pro; a lower concentration of them is required in animals such as fish, whose body temperatures are lower than most warm-blooded animals. Lower proline and hydroxyproline contents are characteristic of cold-water, but not warm-water fish; the latter tend to have similar proline and hydroxyproline contents to mammals.[16] The lower proline and hydroxproline contents of cold-water fish and other poikilotherm animals leads to their collagen having a lower thermal stability than mammalian collagen.[16] This lower thermal stability means that gelatin derived from fish collagen is not suitable for many food and industrial applications.

The tropocollagen subunits spontaneously self-assemble, with regularly staggered ends, into even larger arrays in the extracellular spaces of tissues.[22][23] Additional assembly of fibrils is guided by fibroblasts, which deposit fully formed fibrils from fibripositors.[2] In the fibrillar collagens, the molecules are staggered from each other by about 67 nm (a unit that is referred to as ‘D’ and changes depending upon the hydration state of the aggregate). Each D-period contains four plus a fraction collagen molecules, because 300 nm divided by 67 nm does not give an integer (the length of the collagen molecule divided by the stagger distance D). Therefore, in each D-period repeat of the microfibril, there is a part containing five molecules in cross-section, called the “overlap”, and a part containing only four molecules, called the “gap”.[24] The triple-helices are also arranged in a hexagonal or quasihexagonal array in cross-section, in both the gap and overlap regions.[24][25]

There is some covalent crosslinking within the triple helices, and a variable amount of covalent crosslinking between tropocollagen helices forming well organized aggregates (such as fibrils).[26] Larger fibrillar bundles are formed with the aid of several different classes of proteins (including different collagen types), glycoproteins and proteoglycans to form the different types of mature tissues from alternate combinations of the same key players.[23] Collagen’s insolubility was a barrier to the study of monomeric collagen until it was found that tropocollagen from young animals can be extracted because it is not yet fully crosslinked. However, advances in microscopy techniques (i.e. electron microscopy (EM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM)) and X-ray diffraction have enabled researchers to obtain increasingly detailed images of collagen structure in situ. These later advances are particularly important to better understanding the way in which collagen structure affects cell–cell and cell–matrix communication, and how tissues are constructed in growth and repair, and changed in development and disease.[27][28] For example, using AFM–based nanoindentation it has been shown that a single collagen fibril is a heterogeneous material along its axial direction with significantly different mechanical properties in its gap and overlap regions, correlating with its different molecular organizations in these two regions.[29]

Collagen fibrils/aggregates are arranged in different combinations and concentrations in various tissues to provide varying tissue properties. In bone, entire collagen triple helices lie in a parallel, staggered array. 40 nm gaps between the ends of the tropocollagen subunits (approximately equal to the gap region) probably serve as nucleation sites for the deposition of long, hard, fine crystals of the mineral component, which is (approximately) Ca10(OH)2(PO4)6.[30] Type I collagen gives bone its tensile strength.

Associated disorders

Collagen-related diseases most commonly arise from genetic defects or nutritional deficiencies that affect the biosynthesis, assembly, postranslational modification, secretion, or other processes involved in normal collagen production.

Genetic Defects of Collagen Genes
Type Notes Gene(s) Disorders
I This is the most abundant collagen of the human body. It is present in scar tissue, the end product when tissue heals by repair. It is found in tendons, skin, artery walls, cornea, the endomysiumsurrounding muscle fibers, fibrocartilage, and the organic part of bones and teeth. COL1A1, COL1A2 Osteogenesis imperfecta, Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, Infantile cortical hyperostosis a.k.a. Caffey’s disease
II Hyaline cartilage, makes up 50% of all cartilage protein. Vitreous humour of the eye. COL2A1 Collagenopathy, types II and XI
III This is the collagen of granulation tissue, and is produced quickly by young fibroblasts before the tougher type I collagen is synthesized. Reticular fiber. Also found in artery walls, skin, intestines and the uterus COL3A1 Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, Dupuytren’s contracture
IV Basal lamina; eye lens. Also serves as part of the filtration system in capillaries and the glomeruli ofnephron in the kidney. COL4A1, COL4A2,COL4A3, COL4A4,COL4A5, COL4A6 Alport syndrome, Goodpasture’s syndrome
V Most interstitial tissue, assoc. with type I, associated with placenta COL5A1, COL5A2,COL5A3 Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (Classical)
VI Most interstitial tissue, assoc. with type I COL6A1, COL6A2,COL6A3, COL6A5 Ulrich myopathy, Bethlem myopathy,Atopic dermatitis[31]
VII Forms anchoring fibrils in dermoepidermal junctions COL7A1 Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica
VIII Some endothelial cells COL8A1, COL8A2 Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 2
IX FACIT collagen, cartilage, assoc. with type II and XI fibrils COL9A1, COL9A2,COL9A3 EDM2 and EDM3
X Hypertrophic and mineralizing cartilage COL10A1 Schmid metaphyseal dysplasia
XI Cartilage COL11A1, COL11A2 Collagenopathy, types II and XI
XII FACIT collagen, interacts with type I containing fibrils, decorin and glycosaminoglycans COL12A1
XIII Transmembrane collagen, interacts with integrin a1b1, fibronectin and components of basement membranes like nidogen and perlecan. COL13A1
XIV FACIT collagen, also known as undulin COL14A1
XV COL15A1
XVI COL16A1
XVII Transmembrane collagen, also known as BP180, a 180 kDa protein COL17A1 Bullous pemphigoid and certain forms of junctional epidermolysis bullosa
XVIII Source of endostatin COL18A1
XIX FACIT collagen COL19A1
XX COL20A1
XXI FACIT collagen COL21A1
XXII COL22A1
XXIII MACIT collagen COL23A1
XXIV COL24A1
XXV COL25A1
XXVI EMID2
XXVII COL27A1
XXVIII COL28A1

In addition to the above-mentioned disorders, excessive deposition of collagen occurs in scleroderma.

Diseases

One thousand mutations have been identified in twelve out of more than twenty types of collagen. These mutations can lead to various diseases at the tissue level.[32]

Osteogenesis imperfecta – Caused by a mutation in type 1 collagen, dominant autosomal disorder, results in weak bones and irregular connective tissue, some cases can be mild while others can be lethal, mild cases have lowered levels of collagen type 1 while severe cases have structural defects in collagen.[33]

Chondrodysplasias – Skeletal disorder believed to be caused by a mutation in type 2 collagen, further research is being conducted to confirm this.[34]

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome – Six different types of this disorder, which lead to deformities in connective tissue. Some types can be lethal, leading to the rupture of arteries. Each syndrome is caused by a different mutation, for example type four of this disorder is caused by a mutation in collagen type 3.[35]

Alport syndrome – Can be passed on genetically, usually as X-linked dominant, but also as both an autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive disorder, sufferers have problems with their kidneys and eyes, loss of hearing can also develop in during the childhood or adolescent years.[36]

Osteoporosis – Not inherited genetically, brought on with age, associated with reduced levels of collagen in the skin and bones, growth hormone injections are being researched as a possible treatment to counteract any loss of collagen.[37]

Knobloch syndrome – Caused by a mutation in the COL18A1 gene that codes for the production of collagen XVIII. Patients present with protrusion of the brain tissue and degeneration of the retina, an individual who has family members suffering from the disorder are at an increased risk of developing it themselves as there is a hereditary link.[32]

Characteristics

Collagen is one of the long, fibrous structural proteins whose functions are quite different from those of globular proteins, such as enzymes. Tough bundles of collagen calledcollagen fibers are a major component of the extracellular matrix that supports most tissues and gives cells structure from the outside, but collagen is also found inside certain cells. Collagen has great tensile strength, and is the main component of fascia, cartilage, ligaments, tendons, bone and skin.[38][39] Along with elastin and soft keratin, it is responsible for skin strength and elasticity, and its degradation leads to wrinkles that accompany aging.[10] It strengthens blood vessels and plays a role in tissue development. It is present in the cornea and lens of the eye in crystalline form. It may be one of the most abundant proteins in the fossil record, given that it appears to fossilize frequently, even in bones from the Mesozoic and Paleozoic.[40]

Uses

Collagen has a wide variety of applications, from food to medical. For instance, it is used in cosmetic surgery and burn surgery. It is widely used in the form of collagen casings for sausages, which are also used in the manufacture of musical strings.

If collagen is subject to sufficient denaturation, e.g. by heating, the three tropocollagen strands separate partially or completely into globular domains, containing a different secondary structure to the normal collagen polyproline II (PPII), e.g. random coils. This process describes the formation of gelatin, which is used in many foods, including flavoredgelatin desserts. Besides food, gelatin has been used in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and photography industries.[41] From a nutritional point of view, collagen and gelatin are a poor-quality sole source of protein since they do not contain all the essential amino acids in the proportions that the human body requires—they are not ‘complete proteins‘ (as defined by food science, not that they are partially structured). Manufacturers of collagen-based dietary supplements usually containing hydrolyzed collagen claim that their products can improve skin and fingernail quality as well as joint health. However, mainstream scientific research has not shown strong evidence to support these claims.[42]Individuals with problems in these areas are more likely to be suffering from some other underlying condition (such as normal aging, dry skin, arthritis etc.) rather than just a protein deficiency.

From the Greek for glue, kolla, the word collagen means “glue producer” and refers to the early process of boiling the skin and sinews of horses and other animals to obtain glue. Collagen adhesive was used by Egyptians about 4,000 years ago, and Native Americans used it in bows about 1,500 years ago. The oldest glue in the world, carbon-dated as more than 8,000 years old, was found to be collagen—used as a protective lining on rope baskets and embroidered fabrics, and to hold utensils together; also in crisscross decorations on human skulls.[43] Collagen normally converts to gelatin, but survived due to dry conditions. Animal glues are thermoplastic, softening again upon reheating, and so they are still used in making musical instruments such as fine violins and guitars, which may have to be reopened for repairs—an application incompatible with tough, syntheticplastic adhesives, which are permanent. Animal sinews and skins, including leather, have been used to make useful articles for millennia.

Gelatin-resorcinolformaldehyde glue (and with formaldehyde replaced by less-toxic pentanedial and ethanedial) has been used to repair experimental incisions in rabbit lungs.[44]

History

The molecular and packing structures of collagen have eluded scientists over decades of research. The first evidence that it possesses a regular structure at the molecular level was presented in the mid-1930s.[45][46] Since that time, many prominent scholars, including Nobel laureates Crick, Pauling, Rich and Yonath, and others, including Brodsky,Berman, and Ramachandran, concentrated on the conformation of the collagen monomer. Several competing models, although correctly dealing with the conformation of each individual peptide chain, gave way to the triple-helical “Madras” model of Ramachandran, which provided an essentially correct model of the molecule’s quaternary structure[47][48][49] although this model still required some refinement.[50] [clarification needed] [51][52][53][54] The packing structure of collagen has not been defined to the same degree outside of the fibrillar collagen types, although it has been long known to be hexagonal or quasi-hexagonal.[25][55][56] As with its monomeric structure, several conflicting models alleged that either the packing arrangement of collagen molecules is ‘sheet-like’ or microfibrillar.[50][57][58] The microfibrillar structure of collagen fibrils in tendon, cornea and cartilage has been directly imaged by electron microscopy.[59][60][61] The microfibrillar structure of tail tendon, as described by Fraser, Miller, and Wess (amongst others), was modeled as being closest to the observed structure,[50] although it oversimplified the topological progression of neighboring collagen molecules, and hence did not predict the correct conformation of the discontinuous D-periodic pentameric arrangement termed simply: the microfibril.[24][62] Various cross linking agents like L-Dopaquinone, embeline, potassium embelate and 5-O-methyl embelin could be developed as potential cross-linking/stabilization agents of collagen preparation and its application as wound dressing sheet in clinical applications is enhanced.[63]

See also

References

  1. Jump up^ Di Lullo, Gloria A.; Sweeney, Shawn M.; Körkkö, Jarmo; Ala-Kokko, Leena & San Antonio, James D. (2002). “Mapping the Ligand-binding Sites and Disease-associated Mutations on the Most Abundant Protein in the Human, Type I Collagen”. J. Biol. Chem.277 (6): 4223–4231. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110709200. PMID 11704682.
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c Sherman, Vincent R. (2015). “The materials science of collagen”. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 52: 22–50.doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.023.
  3. Jump up^ Britannica Concise Encyclopedia 2007
  4. Jump up^ Sikorski, Zdzisław E. (2001). Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Proteins. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 242. ISBN 1-56676-960-4.
  5. Jump up^ Bogue, Robert H. (1923). “Conditions Affecting the Hydrolysis of Collagen to Gelatin”.Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 15 (11): 1154–1159. doi:10.1021/ie50167a018.
  6. Jump up^ O.E.D. 2nd Edition 2005
  7. Jump up^ Müller, Werner E. G. (2003). “The Origin of Metazoan Complexity: Porifera as Integrated Animals”. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1093/icb/43.1.3.
  8. Jump up^ Sabiston textbook of surgery board review, 7th edition. Chapter 5 wound healing, question 14
  9. Jump up^ Schauss, A., Stenehjem, J., Park, J., Endres, J., and Clewell, A. (2012). “Effect of the novel low molecular weight hydrolyzed chicken sternal cartilage extract, BioCell Collagen, on improving osteoarthritis-related symptoms: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 60 (16): 4096–101.doi:10.1021/jf205295u. PMID 22486722.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b Dermal Fillers | The Ageing Skin. Pharmaxchange.info. Retrieved on 2013-04-21.
  11. Jump up^ Cunniffe, G; F O’Brien (2011). “Collagen scaffolds for orthopedic regenerative medicine”.The Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 63 (4): 66–73.Bibcode:2011JOM….63d..66C. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0061-y.
  12. Jump up^ Oliveira, S; R Ringshia; R Legeros; E Clark; L Terracio; C Teixeira M Yost (2009). “An improved collagen scaffold for skeletal regeneration”. Journal of Biomedical Materials 94(2): 371–379. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32694. PMC 2891373. PMID 20186736.
  13. Jump up^ Blow, Nathan (2009). “Cell culture: building a better matrix”. Nature Methods 6 (8): 619–622. doi:10.1038/nmeth0809-619.
  14. Jump up^ Birbrair, Alexander; Zhang, Tan; Files, Daniel C.; Mannava, Sandeep; Smith, Thomas; Wang, Zhong-Min; Messi, Maria L.; Mintz, Akiva; Delbono, Osvaldo (2014-11-06). “Type-1 pericytes accumulate after tissue injury and produce collagen in an organ-dependent manner”. Stem Cell Research & Therapy 5 (6): 122. doi:10.1186/scrt512. ISSN 1757-6512. PMC 4445991. PMID 25376879.
  15. Jump up^ Singh, O; SS Gupta; M Soni; S Moses; S Shukla; RK Mathur (2011). “Collagen dressing versus conventional dressings in burn and chronic wounds: a retrospective study”.Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 4 (1): 12–16. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.79180. PMC 3081477. PMID 21572675.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Szpak, Paul (2011). “Fish bone chemistry and ultrastructure: implications for taphonomy and stable isotope analysis”. Journal of Archaeological Science 38 (12): 3358–3372. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.022.
  17. Jump up^ Diegelmann, Robert. “Collagen Metabolism”. Medscape.com. Medscape. Retrieved4 December 2014.
  18. Jump up^ Gorres, K. L.; Raines, R. T. (2010). “Prolyl 4-hydroxylase”. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 45 (2): 106–24. doi:10.3109/10409231003627991. PMC 2841224.PMID 20199358.
  19. Jump up^ Myllylä, R.; Majamaa, K.; Günzler, V.; Hanauske-Abel, H. M.; Kivirikko, K. I. (1984). “Ascorbate is consumed stoichiometrically in the uncoupled reactions catalyzed by propyl 4-hydroxylase and lysyl hydroxylase”. J. Biol. Chem. 259 (9): 5403–5. PMID 6325436.
  20. Jump up^ Houck, J. C.; Sharma, V. K.; Patel, Y. M.; Gladner, J. A. (1968). “Induction of Collagenolytic and Proteolytic Activities by AntiInflammatory Drugs in the Skin and Fibroblasts”. Biochemical Pharmacology 17 (10): 2081–2090. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(68)90182-2. PMID 4301453.
  21. Jump up^ Al-Hadithy, H.; Isenberg, DA; et al. (1982). “Neutrophil function in systemic lupus erythematosus and other collagen diseases”. Ann Rheum Dis 41 (1): 33–38.doi:10.1136/ard.41.1.33. PMC 1000860. PMID 7065727.
  22. Jump up^ Hulmes, D. J. (2002). “Building collagen molecules, fibrils, and suprafibrillar structures”. J Struct Biol 137 (1–2): 2–10. doi:10.1006/jsbi.2002.4450. PMID 12064927.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b Hulmes, D. J. (1992). “The collagen superfamily—diverse structures and assemblies”.Essays Biochem 27: 49–67. PMID 1425603.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c Orgel, J. P.; Irving, TC; et al. (2006). “Microfibrillar structure of type I collagen in situ”. PNAS 103 (24): 9001–9005. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.9001O.doi:10.1073/pnas.0502718103. PMC 1473175. PMID 16751282.
  25. ^ Jump up to:a b Hulmes, D. J. & Miller, A. (1979). “Quasi-hexagonal molecular packing in collagen fibrils”. Nature 282 (5741): 878–880. Bibcode:1979Natur.282..878H.doi:10.1038/282878a0. PMID 514368.
  26. Jump up^ Perumal, S.; Antipova, O. & Orgel, J. P. (2008). “Collagen fibril architecture, domain organization, and triple-helical conformation govern its proteolysis”. PNAS 105 (8): 2824–2829. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.2824P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710588105.PMC 2268544. PMID 18287018.
  27. Jump up^ Sweeney, S. M.; Orgel, JP; et al. (2008). “Candidate Cell and Matrix Interaction Domains on the Collagen Fibril, the Predominant Protein of Vertebrates”. J Biol Chem 283 (30): 21187–21197. doi:10.1074/jbc.M709319200. PMC 2475701. PMID 18487200.
  28. Jump up^ Twardowski, T.; Fertala, A.; et al. (2007). “Type I collagen and collagen mimetics as angiogenesis promoting superpolymers”. Curr Pharm Des 13 (35): 3608–3621.doi:10.2174/138161207782794176.
  29. Jump up^ Minary-Jolandan, M; Yu, MF (2009). “Nanomechanical heterogeneity in the gap and overlap regions of type I collagen fibrils with implications for bone heterogeneity”.Biomacromolecules 10 (9): 2565–70. doi:10.1021/bm900519v. PMID 19694448.
  30. Jump up^ Ross, M. H. and Pawlina, W. (2011) Histology, 6th ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, p. 218.
  31. Jump up^ Söderhäll, C.; Marenholz, I.; Kerscher, T.; Rüschendorf, F; Rüschendorf, F.; Esparza-Gordillo, J.; Mayr, G; et al. (2007). “Variants in a Novel Epidermal Collagen Gene (COL29A1) Are Associated with Atopic Dermatitis”. PLoS Biology 5 (9): e242.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050242. PMC 1971127. PMID 17850181.
  32. ^ Jump up to:a b Mahajan, VB, Olney, AH, Garrett, P, Chary, A, Dragan, E, Lerner, G, Murray, J & Bassuk, AG; Olney; Garrett; Chary; Dragan; Lerner; Murray; Bassuk (2010). “Collagen XVIII mutation in Knobloch syndrome with acute lymphoblastic leukemia”. American journal of medical genetics. Part A 152A (11): 2875–9. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33621.PMC 2965270. PMID 20799329.
  33. Jump up^ Gajko-Galicka, A (2002). “Mutations in type I collagen genes resulting in osteogenesis imperfecta in humans” (PDF). Acta biochimica Polonica 49 (2): 433–41.PMID 12362985.
  34. Jump up^ Horton, WA, Campbell, D, Machado, MA & Chou, J; Campbell; Machado; Chou (1989). “Type II collagen screening in the human chondrodysplasias”. American Journal of Medical Genetics 34 (4): 579–83. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320340425. PMID 2624272.
  35. Jump up^ Hamel, BCJ; Pals, G.; Engels, CHAM; Akker, E.; Boers, GHJ; van Dongen, PWJ; Steijlen, PM (28 June 2008). “Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and type III collagen abnormalities: a variable clinical spectrum”. Clinical Genetics 53 (6): 440–446. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1998.tb02592.x. PMID 9712532.
  36. Jump up^ Kashtan, CE (1993) “Collagen IV-Related Nephropathies (Alport Syndrome and Thin Basement Membrane Nephropathy)”, in RA Pagon, TD Bird, CR Dolan, K Stephens & MP Adam (eds), GeneReviews, University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle WA PMID 20301386.
  37. Jump up^ Shuster, S (2005). “Osteoporosis, a unitary hypothesis of collagen loss in skin and bone”.Medical Hypotheses 65 (3): 426–32. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2005.04.027.PMID 15951132.
  38. Jump up^ Fratzl, P. (2008). Collagen: Structure and Mechanics. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-73905-X.
  39. Jump up^ Buehler, M. J. (2006). “Nature designs tough collagen: Explaining the nanostructure of collagen fibrils”. PNAS 103 (33): 12285–12290. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10312285B.doi:10.1073/pnas.0603216103. PMC 1567872. PMID 16895989.
  40. Jump up^ Zylberberg, L.; Laurin, M. (2011). “Analysis of fossil bone organic matrix by transmission electron microscopy”. Comptes rendus Palevol 11 (5–6): 357–366.doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2011.04.004.
  41. Jump up^ “Gelatin’s Advantages: Health, Nutrition and Safety”. gmap-gelatin.com. Archived fromthe original on May 5, 2006.
  42. Jump up^ European Food Safety Authority – EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to collagen hydrolysate and maintenance of joints pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/20061. EFSA Journal 2011;9(7):2291.
  43. Jump up^ Walker, Amélie A. (May 21, 1998). “Oldest Glue Discovered”. Archaeology.
  44. Jump up^ Ennker, I. C.; Ennker, JüRgen; et al. (1994). “Formaldehyde-free collagen glue in experimental lung gluing”. Ann Thorac Surg. 57 (6): 1622–1627. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(94)90136-8. PMID 8010812.
  45. Jump up^ Wyckoff, R.; Corey, R. & Biscoe, J. (1935). “X-ray reflections of long spacing from tendon”. Science 82 (2121): 175–176. Bibcode:1935Sci….82..175W.doi:10.1126/science.82.2121.175. PMID 17810172.
  46. Jump up^ Clark, G.; Parker, E.; Schaad, J. & Warren, W. J. (1935). “New measurements of previously unknown large interplanar spacings in natural materials”. J. Amer. Chem. Soc 57(8): 1509. doi:10.1021/ja01311a504.
  47. Jump up^ Balasubramanian, D . (October 2001). “GNR — A Tribute”. Resonance (Indian Academy of Sciences) 6 (10).
  48. Jump up^ Leonidas, Demetres D.; Chavali, GB; et al. (2001). “Binding of Phosphate and pyrophosphate ions at the active site of human angiogenin as revealed by X-ray crystallography”. Protein Science 10 (8): 1669–1676. doi:10.1110/ps.13601.PMC 2374093. PMID 11468363.
  49. Jump up^ Subramanian, Easwara (2001). “Obituary: G.N. Ramachandran”. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 8 (6): 489–491. doi:10.1038/88544. PMID 11373614.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b c Saad, Mohamed (Oct 1994). Low resolution structure and packing investigations of collagen crystalline domains in tendon using Synchrotron Radiation X-rays, Structure factors determination, evaluation of Isomorphous Replacement methods and other modeling. PhD Thesis, Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble I. pp. 1–221.doi:10.13140/2.1.4776.7844.
  51. Jump up^ Fraser, R. D.; MacRae, T. P. & Suzuki, E. (1979). “Chain conformation in the collagen molecule”. J Mol Biol 129 (3): 463–481. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(79)90507-2.PMID 458854.
  52. Jump up^ Okuyama, K.; Okuyama, K; et al. (1981). “Crystal and molecular structure of a collagen-like polypeptide (Pro-Pro-Gly)10“. J Mol Biol 152 (2): 427–443. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(81)90252-7. PMID 7328660.
  53. Jump up^ Traub, W.; Yonath, A. & Segal, D. M. (1969). “On the molecular structure of collagen”.Nature 221 (5184): 914–917. Bibcode:1969Natur.221..914T. doi:10.1038/221914a0.
  54. Jump up^ Bella, J.; Eaton, M.; Brodsky, B.; Berman, H. M. (1994). “Crystal and molecular structure of a collagen-like peptide at 1.9 A resolution”. Science 266 (5182): 75–81.Bibcode:1994Sci…266…75B. doi:10.1126/science.7695699. PMID 7695699.
  55. Jump up^ Jesior, J. C.; Miller, A. & Berthet-Colominas, C. (1980). “Crystalline three-dimensional packing is general characteristic of type I collagen fibrils”. FEBS Lett 113 (2): 238–240.doi:10.1016/0014-5793(80)80600-4. PMID 7389896.
  56. Jump up^ Fraser, R. D. B. & MacRae, T. P. (1981). “Unit cell and molecular connectivity in tendon collagen”. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 3 (3): 193–200. doi:10.1016/0141-8130(81)90063-5.
  57. Jump up^ Fraser, R. D.; MacRae, T. P.; Miller, A. (1987). “Molecular packing in type I collagen fibrils”. J Mol Biol 193 (1): 115–125. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90631-0.PMID 3586015.
  58. Jump up^ Wess, T. J.; Hammersley, AP; et al. (1998). “Molecular packing of type I collagen in tendon”. J Mol Biol 275 (2): 255–267. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1449. PMID 9466908.
  59. Jump up^ Raspanti, M.; Ottani, V.; Ruggeri, A. (1990). “Subfibrillar architecture and functional properties of collagen: a comparative study in rat tendons”. J Anat. 172: 157–164.PMC 1257211. PMID 2272900.
  60. Jump up^ Holmes, D. F.; Gilpin, C. J.; Baldock, C.; Ziese, U.; Koster, A. J.; Kadler, K. E. (2001).“Corneal collagen fibril structure in three dimensions: Structural insights into fibril assembly, mechanical properties, and tissue organization”. PNAS 98 (13): 7307–7312.Bibcode:2001PNAS…98.7307H. doi:10.1073/pnas.111150598. PMC 34664.PMID 11390960.
  61. Jump up^ Holmes, D. F.; Kadler, KE (2006). “The 10+4 microfibril structure of thin cartilage fibrils”. PNAS 103 (46): 17249–17254. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10317249H.doi:10.1073/pnas.0608417103. PMC 1859918. PMID 17088555.
  62. Jump up^ Okuyama, K; Bächinger, HP; Mizuno, K; Boudko, SP; Engel, J; Berisio, R; Vitagliano, L (2009). “Comment on Microfibrillar structure of type I collagen in situ by Orgel et al. (2006), Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 9001–9005”. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 65 (Pt9): 1009–10. doi:10.1107/S0907444909023051. PMID 19690380.
  63. Jump up^ Narayanaswamy, Radhakrishnan; Shanmugasamy, Sangeetha; Shanmugasamy, Sangeetha; Gopal, Ramesh; Mandal, Asit (2011). “Bioinformatics in crosslinking chemistry of collagen with selective crosslinkers”. BMC Research Notes 4: 399. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-399.

External links

12 types of collagen

////////

Share

Illegal Drugs in Dietary Supplements

 drugs  Comments Off on Illegal Drugs in Dietary Supplements
May 132016
 

thumbnail image: Illegal Drugs in Dietary Supplements

Illegal Drugs in Dietary Supplements

Forbidden stimulant oxilofrine found in various dietary supplements sold in the USA

Read more

http://www.chemistryviews.org/details/news/9278771/Illegal_Drugs_in_Dietary_Supplements.html

 

 

Oxilofrine (also known as methylsynephrine, hydroxyephrine, oxyephrine, and 4-HMP) is a stimulant drug[1] and is anamphetamine chemically related to ephedrine and to synephrine.

Oxilofrine is currently a WADA prohibited substance when used in competition.[2] It is an ingredient found in some dietary supplements.

Publicized cases

  • In 2009, Brazilian/American cyclist Flávia Oliveira was suspended for 2 years after taking a supplement known as “HyperDrive 3.0+” which contained methylsynephrine, a chemical equivalent of Oxilofrine, among other substances. [3] Her sentence was eventually reduced to 18 months after an appeal as there was enough evidence that she had unknowingly consumed said substance as the old label did not list methylsynephrine.[4]
  • On July 14, 2013, Jamaican runners Asafa Powell and Sherone Simpson tested positive for Oxilofrine prior to the 2013 World Athletics Championships. [5] Powell, however, maintained that he did not take any banned supplements knowingly or willfully.[6]Powell voluntarily withdrew as a result of the test. On 10 April 2014, both athletes received an 18-month suspension from competing, which was set to expire in December that year.[7] However, after appealing to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), both athletes’ suspensions were lifted on 14 July 2014.[8]
  • On July 16, 2015, Boston Red Sox pitching prospect Michael Kopech was suspended without pay for 50 games after testing positive for Oxilofrine, which is a banned substance under the Minor League Drug Prevention and Treatment Program. Kopech denied knowingly taking the substance.[9]

 

 

 

 

References

  1.  Fourcroy, Jean L. (2008). Pharmacology, doping and sports: a scientific guide for athletes, coaches, physicians, scientists and administrators. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-42845-3.
  2.  http://list.wada-ama.org/prohibited-in-competition/prohibited-substances/
  3.  Charles Pelkey (2010-04-13). “Oliveira suspended for two years”. Velonews.
  4.  Charles Pelkey (2011-02-24). “Court of Arbitration for Sport reduces Flavia Oliveira suspension”. Velonews.
  5.  Reuters. “Jamaicans Powell, Simpson test positive – SuperSport – Athletics”. SuperSport. Retrieved 2013-07-15.
  6.  “Jamaican Sprinter Asafa Powell slapped 18-month ban for doping”. IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  7.  “Asafa Powell banned for 18 months for doping”. BBC Sport. 10 April 2014. Archived from the original on 9 May 2014.
  8.  Drayton, John (14 July 2014). “Asafa Powell and Sherone Simpson given green light to return to action after sprinters have doping bans reduced to six months”. Mail Online. Retrieved14 July 2014.
  9.  Danny Wild (16 July 2015). “Red Sox No. 10 prospect Kopech suspended”. MiLB.com. Retrieved 8 March 2016
Oxilofrine
Oxilofrin Structural Formulae V.1.svg
Systematic (IUPAC) name
(1S*,2R*)-(±)-4-(1-Hydroxy-2-methylamino-propyl)phenol
Legal status
Legal status
  • Uncontrolled
Identifiers
CAS Number 365-26-4 
ATC code none
PubChem CID 9701
ChemSpider 9320 Yes
UNII F49638UBDR Yes
KEGG D08314 Yes
ChEMBL CHEMBL30400 Yes
Chemical data
Formula C10H15NO2
Molar mass 181.23 g/mol

////Illegal Drugs, Dietary Supplements, Forbidden stimulant , oxilofrine, dietary supplements ,  USA, Oxilofrine

Share

APIs from Legitimate and Reliable Sources

 regulatory  Comments Off on APIs from Legitimate and Reliable Sources
May 122016
 

APIs from Legitimate and Reliable Sources

1. Introduction

Counterfeit and sub-standard APIs are increasingly present. Not only are they a fact of non-compliance but also they form a serious and increasing risk for patient safety. Various initiatives have been taken such as the founding of the FDA Counterfeit Drug Task Force, the European Commission’s current “Public consultation in preparation of a legal proposal to combat counterfeit medicines for human use” and the WHO Program “IMPACT” (International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce).

API =Active pharmaceutical ingredient (synonym: drug substance)

Counterfeit API =Active pharmaceutical ingredient for which source and/or quality are falsely represented on the label, on the certificate of analysis or otherwise

Rogue API =API that is counterfeit or severely, deliberately non-compliant.

This writeup focuses on the interaction between the API manufacturer and the medicinal product manufacturer and provides possible measures that may be taken by both partners in order to ensure only non-rogue APIs are used in the manufacture of medicinal products. The proposed measures are considered as elements out of a whole puzzle. A risk-based approach should be applied to determine the necessity and value of the individual proposals, alone or in combination. The document does not address in detail the vendor qualification process as it is taken for granted that APIs are only purchased from suppliers that have been thorough checked

API manufacturer= Active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturer

Medicinal product manufacturer= formulation manufacturer

Supply Chain

A supply chain is actually a complex and dynamicsupply and demand network. A supply chain is a system of organizations, people, activities, information, and resources involved in moving a product or service from supplier to customer.

2. Supply Chain:

Agents, Brokers, Distributors, Repackers, Relabelers As a general principle, the shorter the supply chain, the more secure it will be. This is reflected in the EU GMP Guidelines, Part 1 (5.26) specifying that starting materials (APIs, excipients) should be purchased, where possible, directly from the producer.

In addition to the length of the supply chain, any changes on the original container – e.g. by repackaging, relabeling – should be considered as an additional risk for alteration and should therefore, whenever possible, be avoided.

There is no doubt that the entire supply chain needs to be assessed from a quality perspective, covered by an effective supplier qualification program and the same principles as described in the following sections for the direct supply form API manufacturer to drug product manufacturer should be applied. This already starts at the point of selecting the contractor for transportation of the API (see also ICH Q7, 10.23).

 

 

3. On Site Visits / Audits

3.1.

Visits

A thorough knowledge of the supplier is a key element. Therefore, a close and stable relationship between the manufacturer of the API and the drug product manufacturer should be achieved by using various means of contact. A regular exchange between 3/8 sourcing- and purchasing people and the supplier contributes to strengthening this relationship, especially if the contact also includes regular visits on site. Site visits should not be restricted to the manufacturing site alone; intermediaries in the supply chain should be covered as well. It should be ensured that representatives of the purchasing department have a good GMP- and regulatory awareness and technical understanding so that these visits are as beneficial as possible, also in relation to compliance.

Audits=Auditing refers to a systematic and independent examination of books, accounts, documents and vouchers of an organization to ascertain how far the statements present a true and fair view of the concern.

3.2. Audits

An audit is considered the most effective way of verifying concrete and compliant manufacturing incl. distribution of APIs. However, apart from the fact that an audit is very time-consuming it only provides a snapshot of the situation and there is no 100% guarantee that evidence for any occurring counterfeiting activities may be identified. Nonetheless, there are various elements in a quality audit that may increase that probability and that respectively may confirm the reliability of the manufacturer.

Counterfeiting activities= To counterfeit means to imitate something. Counterfeit products are fake replicas of the real product. Counterfeit products are often produced with the intent to take advantage of the superior value of the imitated product

3.2.1 General

Whenever possible, the audit should be executed when an actual production campaign is ongoing.

Requests for changing the agenda at short notice during the audit, e.g. revisiting areas on another time or day, may be a useful approach to confirm the consistency of operations on site.

 

 

Warehouse=A warehouse is a commercial building for storage of goods. Warehouses are used by manufacturers, importers, exporters, wholesalers,transport businesses, customs, etc

3.2.2 Warehouse

The walk-through in the warehouse supports the verification of the materials management capability with respect to claimed annual production of the API and storage capacity.

Checking for the presence of intermediates or APIs in the warehouse that have been purchased and could be subject for relabeling or of APIs intended to undergo a reprocessing may lead to the identification of different sources of materials than claimed. The list of approved vendors should also be reviewed for this purpose.

The review of the materials management system and material movements (booking in/out) of concerned API starting materials, intermediates and the final API is another possible source of information in the warehouse. However, confidentiality with respect to other customers’ names needs to be respected.

Production=the action of making or manufacturing from components or raw materials, or the process of being so manufactured.

3.2.3 Production

The walk-through in production should cover the verification of the necessary equipment and necessary utilities by cross-checking with the production instruction and/or process flow chart.

 

 

Document Review=Document review (also known as doc review) is the process whereby each party to a case sorts through and analyzes the documents and data they possess (and later the documents and data supplied by their opponents through discovery) to determine which are sensitive or otherwise relevant to the case

3.2.4 Document Review

The review of master production instructions as well as analytical methods and specifications for raw materials, intermediates and the API as well as of executed documents/raw data and cross-checks with the regulatory document (e.g. DMF, CMC section, CEP dossier) is an important element in verifying regulatory compliance.

One can also verify the availability of production records and/or analytical raw data as well as retained samples (where applicable) of raw material, intermediates and API batches for specific batches that were either identified from the review of the stock cards/materials management system, product quality review or from supplied batches.

The timely and sequential correlation of equipment use logbooks in production and QC laboratory, production batch records (incl. electronic raw data), cleaning records and analytical raw data (incl. date/time on equipment printouts such as balances, chromatographic systems etc.) is a good indicator for on site production.

The review of the documentation related to seals (specifications – testing/approval according to specifications – reconciliation documentation – authorized persons identified and documented…) may be added.

A spot wise review of analytical raw data from stability studies (not only the summary table) as well as of the logbook of the stability chambers (e.g. date of sample in/out) and the check for physical availability of the stability samples should be included.

The adequate involvement of the drug product manufacturer in case of changes that can impact the quality and/or regulatory compliance of the API may be verified by the reviewing the history of changes and individual change request cases related to the production and testing of the API (incl. intermediates, raw materials),

4. Supporting Documentation

The availability of certain documents that are regularly available and up-dated, where applicable, may be considered as one efficient element in the continuous supplier monitoring process.

 

 

Inspections=Inspections are usually non-destructive. Inspections may be a visual inspection or involve sensing technologies such as ultrasonic testing, accomplished with a direct physical presence or remotely such as a remote visual inspection, and manually or automatically

4.1 Inspections,

Inspection history As part of the initial evaluation of a potential API supplier the GMP inspection history, with respect to inspecting regulatory body, inspection date, inspected areas (as far as this information is / is made available) and the inspection results should be reviewed. A regular up-date of the inspection history as part of the supplier monitoring and requalification process should be performed. On the other hand, as these inspections are not mandatory for APIs e.g. used in medicinal products for the EU, the non-availability of an inspection history may not lead to the conclusion that this API supplier is less reliable. 5/8

 

 

GMP=Good manufacturing practices (GMP) are the practices required in order to conform to the guidelines recommended by agencies that control authorization and licensing for manufacture and sale of food, drug products, and active pharmaceutical products. These guidelines provide minimum requirements that a pharmaceutical or a food product manufacturer must meet to assure that the products are of high quality and do not pose any risk to the consumer or public.

 

4.2 GMP certificates

GMP certificates of the API manufacturer, where available (see 4.1), should be provided, ideally as authentic copies.

 

 

Certificate of Analysis=A Certificate of Analysis is a document issued by Quality Assurance that confirms that a regulated product meets its product specification. They commonly contain the actual results obtained from testing performed as part of quality control of an individual batch of a product.

4.3 Certificate of Analysis

A thorough review of Certificate of Analysis, against regulatory documents (e.g. DMF, CMC section, CEP dossier) and in-house specification respectively, and with respect to GMP compliance (ICH Q7, 11.14) should be performed as part of incoming release testing of APIs. Suppliers involved in counterfeiting could apply improper documentation practices. In case of agents, brokers etc. being involved in the supply chain it is recommended to insist on a certificate of analysis issued by the original manufacturer of the API (see also 2.). Where a new certificate of analysis is prepared by agent, broker, distributor, there should be a reference to the name and address of the original manufacturer and a copy of the original batch Certificate should be attached, as specifically required by ICH Q7 11.43, 44

4.4 Certificate of Compliance,

Compliance Commitment A certificate of compliance issued by the API manufacturer, either as a separate document or as part of the certificate of analysis, which certifies that a specific batch has been manufactured according to ICH Q7 GMP requirements and in line with the applicable Registration Documents can provide additional assurance related to the awareness of the manufacturer on the quality and regulatory expectations of the customers.

4.5 On-going stability program

A GMP compliant manufacturer has an on-going stability program for its APIs (ICH Q7, 11.5). At least one batch of the API manufactured per year is added to the stability program and tested at least annually. A regular up-date of the program provided by the API manufacturer, not necessarily including stability data, gives additional assurance for actual and compliant systems.

4.6 Product Quality Review

The major objective of the Product Quality Review (ICH Q7, 2.5) is to evaluate the compliance status of the manufacture (process, packaging, labelling and tests) and to identify areas of improvement based on the evaluation of key data. It includes a review of critical in-process controls and critical API test results, of batches that failed to meet specification, of changes carried out, of the stability monitoring program, of quality-related returns/complaints/recalls and of the adequacy of corrective actions. Due to the comprehensive information included, the Product Quality Review provides a good overview of the manufacture of a certain API.

The document should be reviewed during an audit or as a minimum an approved executive summary should be made available by the API manufacturer.

4.7 Quality Agreement

The quality agreement as a tool to clearly define the GMP responsibilities strengthens the awareness of liabilities of both partners. The extent and level of detail of the agreement may vary and can depend on the material supplied, e.g. generic API versus exclusively synthesized API, but it should at least address – name of the product – mutually agreed specification (if not covered by supply agreement) – manufacturing site – applicable cGMP standards, e.g. ICH Q7 – compliance with the DMF or with other registration documentation – GMP audits related to the API (e.g. 3rd party auditing) – documents to be provided by the manufacturer, e.g. certificate of analysis, certificate of compliance, inclusion of copies of respective master documents may be addressed – arrangements for transportation and transport packaging (see 5.), e.g. description and degree of tampering proof seal to be used, inclusion of a copy of the master drum label may be considered – deviation handling – handling of and response to complaints – change management: involvement of the customer with respect to notification and approval – list of approved signatories may be included

 

5 Packaging:

labeling, tamper-proof sealing If the API manufacturer provides examples/templates of master labels, which he uses to label the containers, this supports the drug product manufacturer in identifying any manipulation on the material on its way from the manufacturer to the recipient.

The use of tamper-resistant packaging closure by the manufacturer provides additional assurance that the material was not adulterated on its way from the manufacturer to the drug product manufacturer. A manufacturer-specific design of the seal is recommended to be used; the use of unique seals may be considered. The communication of the type of seal, by the manufacturer to the user, completes the information chain.

Material Inspection = Critical appraisal involving examination, measurement, testing, gauging, and comparison of materials or items. An inspection determines if the material or item is in proper quantity and condition, and if it conforms to the applicable or specified requirements. Inspection is generally divided into three categories: (1) Receiving inspection, (2) In-process inspection, and (3) Final inspection. In quality control (which is guided by the principle that “Quality cannot be inspected into a product”) the role of inspection is to verify and validate the variance data; it does not involve separating the good from the bad.

Sampling= Sampling is the process of selecting units (e.g., people, organizations) from a population of interest so that by studying the sample we may fairly generalize our results back to the population from which they were chosen.

6. Material Inspection, Sampling, Analysis, Impurity Profile

At the point of receipt the first relevant action is to carefully perform the visual inspection of all the containers of the API. Attention shall be paid to the integrity and type of the sealing as well as to the special attributes added by the manufacturer (see above 4.7, 5.) such as label design, seal number and design.

The applied sampling regime related to the number of containers sampled, number of samples taken per container, analysis of individual and/or pooled samples as well as the extent of analysis, varying from identity test to full analysis may influence the probability of identifying counterfeiting, provided it may be identified by analytical means.

A risk-based approach, considering the qualification status of the supplier, may be chosen to define the extent of sampling and testing, considering the requirements for drug product manufacturers (e.g. Annex 8 to EU GMP Guidelines). 7/8 The impurity profile is normally dependent on the production process and origin of the API. The comparison of the impurity profile of a current batch with either previous batches or data provided by the manufacturer (e.g. as part of the regulatory submission) may help in order to identify changes related to modifications in the production process and may indicate whether the API might originate from a different manufacturer than the supposed one.

It is recommended to check the current (im)purity profile and compare it with former quality in regular intervals, at least once a year

 

DISCLAIMER

I , Dr A.M.Crasto is writing this blog to share the knowledge/views, after reading Scientific Journals/Articles/News Articles/Wikipedia. My views/comments are based on the results /conclusions by the authors(researchers). I do mention either the link or reference of the article(s) in my blog and hope those interested can read for details. I am briefly summarising the remarks or conclusions of the authors (researchers). If one believe that their intellectual property right /copyright is infringed by any content on this blog, please contact or leave message at below email address amcrasto@gmail.com. It will be removed ASAP

/////

Share
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: