
At award function for my award “100 Most Impactful Health care Leaders Global listing”, conferred on me at Taj lands end, Mumbai, India on 14 Feb 2014 by World Health Wellness congress and awards

tert-butyl(3aR,6aS)-5-oxohexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole-2(1H)-carboxylate
tert-Butyl (3aR,6aS)-5-Oxohexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole-2(1H)-carboxylate (1)
HPLC conditions were as follows for compound ; Agilent 1100 series, column: YMC J’SPHERE C18 (150 mm X 4.6 mm) 4µm with mobile phases A (0.05% TFA in water) and B (acetonitrile). Detection was at 210 nm, flow was set at 1.0 mL/min, and the temperature was 30 °C (Run time: 45 min). Gradient: 0 min, A = 90%, B = 10%; 5.0 min, A = 90%, B = 10%; 25 min, A = 0%, B = 100%; 30 min, A = 0%, B = 100%, 35 min, A = 90%, B = 10%; 45 min, A = 90%, B = 10%.
/////
(3R)-4-[2-chloro-6-[[(R)-methylsulfinyl]methyl]pyrimidin-4-yl]-3-methyl-morpholine
Synthesis of (3R)-4-[2-chloro-6-[[(R)-methylsulfinyl]methyl]pyrimidin-4-yl]-3-methyl-morpholine (10)
off-white solid (53.9 kg, 68.3% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ): 1.20 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 2.52 (m, 1 H), 2.63 (s, 3 H), 3.21 (m, 1 H), 3.44 (m, 1 H), 3.58 (dd, J = 11.6, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.72 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.92 (m, 3 H), 4.07 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.80 (s, 1 H); Assay (HPLC) 99%; Assay (QNMR) 100%; Chiral purity (HPLC) (R,R)-diastereoisomer 99.6%, (R,S)-diastereoisomer 0.4%.

A Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenase enzyme has been used to manufacture a chiral sulfoxide drug intermediate on a kilogram scale. This paper describes the evolution of the biocatalytic manufacturing process from the initial enzyme screen, development of a kilo lab process, to further optimization for plant scale manufacture. Efficient gas–liquid mass transfer of oxygen is key to obtaining a high yield.

“ALL FOR DRUGS” CATERS TO EDUCATION GLOBALLY, No commercial exploits are done or advertisements added by me. This article is a compilation for educational purposes only.
P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent
(±)-trans-ethyl 2-(3,4-difluorophenyl)Cyclopropanecarboxylate
C12H12F2O2
GC-MS (EI) m/z: [M]+ calc. for C12H12F2O2 + : 226.08; found: 226.08.
δH (400 MHz, CDCl3): 1.25 (1H, ddd, 3 J 8.4 Hz, 3 J 6.4 Hz, 2 J 4.5 Hz , 3-H); 1.28 (3H, t 3 J 6.4 Hz CH3Ethyl) 1.57-1.62 (2H, m, 3 J 9.2 Hz, 3 J 5.2 Hz, 2 J 4.5 Hz, 3-H + H2O), 1.84 (1H, ddd, 3 J 8.5 Hz, 3 J 5.3 Hz, 3 J 4.3 Hz , 2-H), 2.47 (1H, ddd, 3 J 9.5 Hz, 3 J 6.4 Hz, 3 J 4.2 Hz , 1-H), 4.17 (2H, q, 3 J 6.3 Hz, CH2Ethyl) 6.81-6.87 (1H, m, 3 J 8.5 Hz, 4 J 7.6 Hz, 4 J 2.4 Hz, 6-H’ ), 6.88 (1H, ddd, 3 J 11.5 Hz, 4 J 7.6 Hz, 4 J 2.2 Hz, 2-H’) 7.06 (1H, dt, 3 J 10.3 Hz, 3 J 8.2 Hz. 5-H’).
δc (400 MHz, CDCl3): 14.27 (CH3Ethyl), 16.84 (3-C) 24.04 (1-C), 25.14 (d, 4 J 1.4, 2-C), 60.71 (CH2Ethyl), 114.74 (d, 2 J 19 Hz, 2-C’), 117.09 (d, 2 J 18 Hz, 5-C’), 122.25 (dd, 3 J 6.1 Hz, 4 J 3.4 Hz, 6- C’), 137.06 (dd, 3 J 6.1 Hz, 4 J 3.4 Hz, 1- C’), 149.2 (dd, 1 J 248 Hz, 2 J 13 Hz, 4-C’) 151.32 (dd, 1 J 249 Hz, 2 J 12.5 Hz, 3-C’) 172.87 (Ccarbonyl).
[ ] 20 a D = -381.9 (c 1.0 in EtOH) for (1R,2R)-3, ee = 95%

In this study a batch reactor process is compared to a flow chemistry approach for lipase-catalyzed resolution of the cyclopropanecarboxylate ester (±)-3. (1R,2R)-3 is a precursor of the amine (1R,2S)-2 which is a key building block of the API ticagrelor. For both flow and batch operation, the biocatalyst could be recycled several times, whereas in the case of the flow process the reaction time was significantly reduced.
“ALL FOR DRUGS” CATERS TO EDUCATION GLOBALLY, No commercial exploits are done or advertisements added by me. This article is a compilation for educational purposes only.
P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent
tert-Butyl 3a,4,7,7a-Tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-2(3H)-carboxylate
tert-Butyl 3a,4,7,7a-Tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-2(3H)-carboxylate
2,2′-(1-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)pyrrolidine-3,4-diyl)diacetic Acid
2,2′-(1-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)pyrrolidine-3,4-diyl)diacetic Acid
Dimethyl 4,4′-(Benzylazanediyl)(2E,2′E)-bis(but-2-enoate)
IR (CHCl3): ν = 758, 1215, 1278, 1437, 1660, 1720, 2806, 2953, 3020, 3421 cm–1;
13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 51.53, 53.42, 58.37, 122.66, 127.28, 128.41, 128.55, 128.76, 138.24, 145.84, 166.58;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 3.23 (dd, J1 = 1.6 Hz, J2 = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 3.62 (s, 2H), 3.75 (s, 6H), 6.07 (dt, J1 = 1.6 Hz, J2 = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (dt, J1 = 6.0 Hz, J2 = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 7.25–7.34 (m, 5H-merged with CDCl3 proton);
TOFMS: [C17H21NO4 + H+]: calculated 304.1543, found 304.1703(100%).
UPLC conditions were as follows for compound 11; Acquity Waters, column: BEH C18 (2.1 mm X 100 mm) 1.7 µm with mobile phases A (0.05% TFA in water) and B (acetonitrile). Detection was at 220 nm, flow was set at 0.4 mL/min, and the temperature was 30 °C (Run time: 9 min). Gradient: 0 min, A = 90%, B = 10%; 0.5 min, A = 90%, B = 10%; 6.0 min, A = 0%, B = 100%; 7.5 min, A = 0%, B = 100%; 7.6 min, A = 90%, B = 10%; 9.0 min, A = 90%, B = 10%.
Dimethyl 4,4′-(Benzylazanediyl)(2E,2′E)-bis(but-2-enoate) (11)
1-Bromo-4-fluoro-2-((2-iodobenzyl)oxy)benzene
CAS 1161931-51-6
Mp 89.8–92.3 °C.
IR (neat, ATR): 3072 (w), 1482 (s), 1451 (s), 1294 (s), 1294 (s) cm–1.
1H NMR (399 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 5.12 (s, 2H), 6.81 (td, J = 8.49, 2.77 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (td, J = 7.64, 1.65 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (dd, J = 10.90, 2.82 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (td, J = 7.52, 0.92 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (dd, J = 7.64, 1.41 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 8.66, 6.23 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (dd, J = 7.83, 0.83 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 74.5, 99.2, 102.4 (d, J = 27.1 Hz), 105.8 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 108.9 (d, J = 22.5 Hz), 128.5, 129.8, 130.3, 133.6 (d, J = 9.9 Hz), 138.0, 139.2, 155.4 (d, J = 10.7 Hz), 162.2 (d, J = 244.3 Hz).
GCMS: m/z [M]+ calcd for C13H9BrFIO: 405.88600; found: 405.88620.
1H AND 13C NMR PREDICT
“ALL FOR DRUGS” CATERS TO EDUCATION GLOBALLY, No commercial exploits are done or advertisements added by me. This article is a compilation for educational purposes only.
P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent

Hana and co-workers ( Synlett 2010, 18, 2759−2764) from Genentech have developed a single-step procedure for conversion of 2-nitro aromatic amines to benzimidazoles. Addition of ammonium chloride proved necessary as Fe powder and formic acid alone was ineffective for nitro reduction. These conditions were compatible with a variety of functional groups on the aromatic, including boronate esters. The methodology was also extended to nitro aminopyridines but failed to deliver the desired product with isoxazole or pyrazole reactants.
*Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA, Email: hanan.emily
gene.com
E. J. Hanan, B. K. Chan, A. A. Estrada, D. G. Shore, J. P. Lyssikatos, Synlett, 2010, 2759-2764.

see article for more reactions
Abstract
A one-pot procedure for the conversion of aromatic and heteroaromatic 2-nitroamines into bicyclic 2H-benzimidazoles employs formic acid, iron powder, and NH4Cl as additive to reduce the nitro group and effect the imidazole cyclization with high-yielding conversions generally within one to two hours. The compatibility with a wide range of functional groups demonstrates the general utility of this procedure.

see article for more examples
//////////One-Pot, Reductive Cyclisations, Nitroanilines, Imidazoles
“ALL FOR DRUGS” CATERS TO EDUCATION GLOBALLY, No commercial exploits are done or advertisements added by me. This article is a compilation for educational purposes only.
P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent
![]()
Telcagepant, MK-0974
Migraine is a neurovascular disorder characterized by severe, debilitating, and throbbing unilateral headache. Though a leading cause of disability, it is a highly prevalent disease with a clear unmet medical need. With the significant progress achieved in the field of pathophysiology in the past decades, to date, it is well recognized that the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which is expressed mainly in the central and peripheral nervous system, plays a crucial role in migraine. Antagonism of CGRP receptors, as a potential new therapy for the treatment of migraine, could offer the advantage of avoiding the cardiovascular liabilities associated with other existing antimigraine therapies.
Telcagepant (INN) (code name MK-0974) is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist which was an investigational drug for the acute treatment and prevention of migraine, developed by Merck & Co. In the acute treatment of migraine, it was found to have equal potency to rizatriptan[1] and zolmitriptan[2] in two Phase III clinical trials. The company has now terminated development of the drug.
The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a strong vasodilator primarily found in nervous tissue. Since vasodilation in the brain is thought to be involved in the development of migraine and CGRP levels are increased during migraine attacks, this peptide may be an important target for potential new antimigraine drugs.
Telcagepant acts as a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CRLR) antagonist and blocks this peptide. It is believed to constrict dilated blood vessels within the brain.[3]
A Phase IIa clinical trial studying telcagepant for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine was stopped on March 26, 2009 after the “identification of two patients with significant elevations in serum transaminases”.[4] A memo to study locations stated that telcagepant had preliminarily been reported to increase the hepatic liver enzyme alanine transaminase (ALT) levels in “11 out of 660 randomized (double-blinded) study participants.” All study participants were told to stop taking the medication.[5]
On July 29, 2011, it was reported that Merck & Co. were discontinuing the clinical development program for telcagepant. According to Merck, “[t]he decision is based on an assessment of data across the clinical program, including findings from a recently completed six-month Phase III study”.[6]
CLIP



CLIP


CLIP
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo101704b




| Clinical data | |
|---|---|
| Routes of administration |
Oral |
| ATC code | none |
| Legal status | |
| Legal status |
|
| Pharmacokinetic data | |
| Biological half-life | 5–8 hours |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 781649-09-0 |
| PubChem (CID) | 11319053 |
| IUPHAR/BPS | 703 |
| ChemSpider | 9494017 |
| UNII | D42O649ALL |
| KEGG | D09391 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL236593 |
| Chemical and physical data | |
| Formula | C26H27F5N6O3 |
| Molar mass | 566.5283 g/mol |
| 3D model (Jmol) | Interactive image |
| Patent ID | Patent Title | Submitted Date | Granted Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US8394767 | Methods of treating cancer using the calcitonin-gene related peptide (â??CGRPâ??) receptor antagonist CGRP8-37 | 2011-01-10 | 2013-03-12 |
| US8080544 | PRODRUGS OF CGRP RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS | 2010-11-25 | 2011-12-20 |
| US7893052 | CGRP RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS | 2010-11-25 | 2011-02-22 |
| US2010286122 | CGRP Antagonist Salt | 2010-11-11 | |
| US7829699 | Process for the Preparation of Cgrp Antagonist | 2009-11-12 | 2010-11-09 |
| US7772224 | CGRP RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS | 2009-07-30 | 2010-08-10 |
| US7745427 | Cgrp Receptor Antagonists | 2008-04-17 | 2010-06-29 |
| US7718796 | Process for the preparation of Caprolactam Cgrp Antagonist | 2009-05-14 | 2010-05-18 |
| US2010009967 | SOLID DOSAGE FORMULATIONS OF TELCAGEPANT POTASSIUM | 2010-01-14 | |
| US2009176986 | Process for the Preparation of Pyridine Heterocycle Cgrp Antagonist Intermediate | 2009-07-09 |
“ALL FOR DRUGS” CATERS TO EDUCATION GLOBALLY, No commercial exploits are done or advertisements added by me. This article is a compilation for educational purposes only.
P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent
C1CC(C(=O)N(CC1C2=C(C(=CC=C2)F)F)CC(F)(F)F)NC(=O)N3CCC(CC3)N4C5=C(NC4=O)N=CC=C5