AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER

MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES

 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES  Comments Off on MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES
Oct 172013
 

PPT from many87

Production of MAb

Fig.1 Production of MAb

Large Scale Production Of MAbs:

Commercially, on large scale, MAbs are produced by two methods.

(a) Ascites production in mice

(b) In-vitro fermentation

The production method is summarized in Fig.no.2a & 2b.

a) Ascites Production In Mice:

The first monoclonal antibodies approved by FDA for therapeutic use OKTS, is produced by ascitic technology19.

In this method hybridoma cells are injected into peritoneal cavity of histocompatible mice. The mice are pretreated by i.p. injection of Pristane to irritate the peritoneal cavity which facilitates the growth of ascitic tumor. The fluid produced may contain the high concentration of secreted MAbs, 2 to 20 μg / ml and 2 to 6 ml or more can be harvested per mouse. Comparison of different MAb production22,23 methods is shown inTable 1.

Drawbacks of this method are:

1. It is very costly, very difficult and not reliable.

2. Product may get contaminated with mouse immunoglobulins and also with other mouse proteins.

3. Viruses can be introduced as contaminants.

4. Antibody yield is often less as compared to other methods.

b) In-Vitro Fermentation:

In this method, the cells are grown and gradually moved to larger and larger culture ensuring exponential growth. Typical antibody levels in the culture supernatant ranges from 5-50 μg/ml depending on the individual clone and on cell density. When more production of antibody is required 1-litre cultures in roller bottles are used. Required cells are removed from rest of media by centrifugation or filtration, generally followed by ultra filtration step for concentrating the filtrate by up to 20 folds.

Advantages of this method are:

(1) As serum required in culture media is reduced, it is cost effective.

(2) There will not be any contamination with mouse immunoglobulin.

But the major drawback is that of contamination of final product with serum or protein based growth factors.

Table 1: Comparison of different MAb production methods.

Production system

Scale

Volume (ml)

Concentration (mg/ml)

Production time (weeks)

Quality

Ascites (in vivo)

20-250 mg

5-10

< 20

2-3

Low
Stir growth

100-2500

0.01-0.1

2-3

High
Dialysis membrane

< 50 mg

10-25

0.1-1.5

2-5

High
Roller bottles

< 2 gm

100-2000

0.01-0.2

2-6

High
Hollow fiber

0.15-30 gm

25-1000

0.2-0.3

3-12

High
Fermentor

2-100 gm

< 2000 lit

0.05-0.5

2-12

High

 MAb Production

Fig. 2a:  MAb Production (Flowchart)

 Freeze Dried MAb Production

Fig. 2b:  Freeze Dried MAb Production (Flowchart)

i) Purification:

Contamination, during production process, such as protein, nucleic acid, endotoxins, immunoglobulin and adventitious agent can be removed by purification method. The purification methods such as precipitation with ammonium sulphate, zone electrophoresis, ion exchange chromatography, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, gel filtration and affinity chromatography are used19.

· Affinity chromatography is often used for initial purification.

· Ion exchange chromatography is used for removing endotoxins and DNA.

· Gel filtration chromatography can remove both high and low molecular form of monoclonal antibodies and it is usually used as the final polishing step.

j) Characterization:

The final determination of monoclonality requires biochemical and biophysical characterization of the immunoglobulin. It is also characterized immunochemically to define its affinity for antigen, its immunoglobulin subclass, the epitopes for which it is specific and the effective number of binding site that it possesses19.

k) Final Processing:

Depending upon the intended application, the antibody may be conjugated to specific radionuclide or toxin. Then the stabilizing agent is added, and the product is filled into final container under inert gas or other specialized conditions.  Lyophillization is frequently applied to get freeze dried product.

Antigenicity Of Murine MAb:

The main problem for mouse MAb is that, human body recognizes it as a foreign agent and produces antibodies against such mouse MAb. The induced human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) quickly reduce the effectiveness of mouse MAb and also their interaction may lead to allergic reactions.

To overcome the problem, Human MAbs can be used. Though difficult, this is possible by fusion of EBV (Epstein Barr Virus) transformed human B-lymphocyte with appropriate fusion partners21. EBV is a lymphotrophic DNA herpes virus which is capable of converting normal B-lymphocytes of human and/or mouse into cancer cell having proliferating capacity in vitro. But the presence of EBV as contaminant can pose a problem of producing cancer24.

Even the human-human hybridomas producing MAbs have been produced 25,26. Olsson and Kaplan in the year 1980 produced first human-human myeloma (SKO-007), against the hapten 2, 4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) 19.

The routine production of human MAbs is prevented due to following reason:-

  • Sources of antibody producing cells27.
  • Reliable methods for lymphocytes immortalization.
  • Stability28 and antibody producing capacity.
  • Administration of some antigens to humans could endanger their health29.
  • Recovery of B-lymphocytes from the spleen of human is impracticable.
  • The fusion of human lymphocytes with human lymphoblastoid cell lines is a very inefficient process.
  • Low production yield of human monoclonal antibody.

Hence, other alternatives methods come forth.

Advantages Of MAbs:

  • Pure one molecular species with high specificity for a particular antigenic target.
  • Anti-serum titer values are high.
  • Antibodies with high avaidity can be produced.
  • In vitro and in vivo production is possible.
  • Radiolabelling and fluorescent conjugation of monoclonal antibody are easy.

Disadvantages Of MAbs:

  • Initial cost involved in the technique is high. However, continuous production is somewhat economical.
  • Methods are time consuming.
  • Antigenicity of Murine MAb.
  • MAbs have comparatively less complement fixing ability than that of convectional antiserum.
  • MAbs are highly selective for a particular single antigenic determinant. This renders them incapable of distinguish between different molecules, cells bearing the chemical structure or determinants except one against which it is targeted.
  • The high antibody avidity (energy of binding to an antigen) of MAbs is advantageous for immunoassay but some property is undesirable for purification process.
Share

Alkermes obtains US FDA fast-track status for depression drug

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Alkermes obtains US FDA fast-track status for depression drug
Oct 152013
 

STR CREDIT
POSTED ON Tuesday, October 15, 2013  FOR ALKS 5461

Irish biotechnology firm Alkermes has received fast-track designation for its proprietary investigational medicine ALKS 5461 from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Fast-track designation was granted for the adjunctive treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who don’t respond to standard therapies. The process intended to speed-up the review of drugs, which treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need.

http://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/newsalkermes-obtains-us-fda-fast-track-status-for-depression-drug?WT.mc_id=DN_News

see a presentation

Ehrich ALKS 5461 Presentation

phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item…t=1

2013 Alkermes. All rights reserved. ALKS 5461: Rethinking. Psychiatry With. Opioid System Modulation. Alkermes R&D Day. July 17, 2013. Elliot Ehrich, M.D..

The drug, ALKS 5461, “significantly reduced” symptoms of depression in the 142-patient study, from the second of three phases of clinical trials generally required for regulatory approval, Alkermes said today in a statement. Based on the results, the company plans to request a meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and start later-stage studies.“We had been deliberately modest with folks over the last year because it’s so potentially important we thought we should be skeptical until we see a confirmatory study,” Alkermes Chief Executive Officer Richard Pops said in a telephone interview today. “The result was so clear when we un-blinded that it was self-evident that we needed to keep going.”

Patients Tested
Alkermes’s drug was tested in patients for whom other medicines, called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, haven’t worked as well as hoped. Treatments in those classes include Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)’s Prozac and Cymbalta. ALKS 5461 was tested on top of drugs patients were already taking as that may be the way the medicine would be used if approved, Pops said.

“This is a potentially very important positive development for Alkermes as ALKS 5461 is an oral, once-a-day drug which has a novel mechanism of action for treating MDD, which represents a very large market opportunity,” Cory Kasimov, an analyst with JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), wrote in a research note today.

About 16.1 million people in the U.S. experience major depressive disorder, or MDD, each year and many don’t get enough of a benefit from the first antidepressants they try, according to Alkermes. Of about 10 million patients who receive treatment for MDD, two-thirds aren’t adequately helped and try a second therapy, Pops said.

ALKS 5461 is a combination of another compound, ALKS 33, and buprenorphine, a therapy that stimulates the opioid system and is approved for treatment of addiction to opioids such as heroin.

The company decided to test the combination based on the premise that opioids have been shown to help in treatment of depression. The problem was their addictive properties, Pops said. ALKS 33 is an opioid receptor blocker, and its use is designed to combat addictive effects.

“We wanted to know if you can decouple the addictive properties of an opioid from antidepressive properties,” Pops said. With ALKS 5461, “we’re pushing the gas and the brake at the same time.”

Alkermes is equipped to start a bigger trial on its own, and may talk with pharmaceutical companies about partnerships to sell the drug outside the U.S. if it’s approved, Pops said, noting “it’s too early” to discuss commercial plans

Share

Formulation Development of Insoluble Drugs

 drugs, GENERIC, MANUFACTURING, nanotechnology  Comments Off on Formulation Development of Insoluble Drugs
Oct 152013
 

Formulation development of insoluble drugs has always been a challenge in pharmaceutical development. This presentation reviews some current options to old problem.

PharmaDirections, Inc.

by , Working at PharmaDirections, Inc

Share

MannKind Resubmits New Drug Application to U.S. FDA for AFREZZA for the Treatment of Adults with Diabetes

 NDA  Comments Off on MannKind Resubmits New Drug Application to U.S. FDA for AFREZZA for the Treatment of Adults with Diabetes
Oct 152013
 

VALENCIA, Calif., October 14, 2013 –(BUSINESS WIRE)–MannKind Corporation (Nasdaq: MNKD) today announced the resubmission on October 13, 2013 of a new drug application (NDA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking approval for the marketing and sale of AFREZZA® (insulin human [rDNA origin]) Inhalation Powder with an indication to improve glycemic control in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The resubmission is based on the entire data set from the extensive AFREZZA clinical development program and particularly the positive results from two recent Phase 3 trials, one in patients with type 1 diabetes (study 171) and one in patients with type 2 diabetes (study 175).

Share

Lundbeck and Otsuka initiate phase III clinical trials on Lu AE58054 as a new add-on treatment for Alzheimer’s disease

 Phase 3 drug  Comments Off on Lundbeck and Otsuka initiate phase III clinical trials on Lu AE58054 as a new add-on treatment for Alzheimer’s disease
Oct 112013
 

 

 

Lu AE58054

2-(6-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-N-(3-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropoxy)benzyl)ethanamine

Valby, Denmark and Tokyo, Japan, 10 October 2013, 2013-10-10 09:15 CEST (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

 

•The clinical program in Alzheimer’s disease is planned to include approximately 3,000 patients from several countries worldwide
•Lu AE58054 is a selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist under investigation for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease[i]

read all at

http://www.drugs.com/clinical_trials/lundbeck-otsuka-move-alzheimer-s-into-phase-iii-16187.html

Lu AE58054 is a potent and selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist under development by Lundbeck as an augmentation therapy for the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with Alzheimer’s disease and schizophrenia.[1][2] As of February 2010 it is in phase II clinical trials.[2]

Lu AE58054 Hydrochloride M.Wt: 434.83
Lu AE58054 Hydrochloride Formula: C20H20ClF5N2O
Lu AE58054 Hydrochloride Storage: at -20℃ 2 years
Lu AE58054 Hydrochloride CAS No.: 467458-02-2

Description: IC50 Value: 0.83 nm[1] Lu AE58054 is an in-vitro potency and selectivity, in-vivo binding affinity and effect of the 5-HT(6)R antagonist. in vitro: Lu AE58054 displayed high affinity to the human 5-HT(6) receptor (5-HT(6)R) with a Ki of 0.83 nm. In a 5-HT(6) GTPgammaS efficacy assay Lu AE58054 showed no agonist activity, but demonstrated potent inhibition of 5-HT-mediated activation. Besides medium affinity to adrenergic alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-adrenoreceptors, Lu AE58054 demonstrated >50-fold selectivity for more than 70 targets examined[1]. in vivo: Orally administered Lu AE58054 potently inhibited striatal in-vivo binding of the 5-HT(6) antagonist radioligand [(3)H]Lu AE60157, with an ED(50) of 2.7 mg/kg. Steady-state modelling of an acute pharmacokinetic/5-HT(6)R occupancy time-course experiment indicated a plasma EC(50) value of 20 ng/ml. Administration of Lu AE58054 in a dose range (5-20 mg/kg p.o.) leading to above 65% striatal 5-HT(6)R binding occupancy in vivo, reversed cognitive impairment in a rat novel object recognition task induced after subchronic treatment for 7 d with phencyclidine (PCP 2 mg/kg b.i.d., i.p. for 7 d, followed by 7 d drug free). The results indicate that Lu AE58054 is a selective antagonist of 5-HT(6)Rs with good oral bioavailability and robust efficacy in a rat model of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia[1]. Clinical trial: Lu-AE58054 Added to Donepezil for the Treatment for Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease. Phase2

References on Lu AE58054 Hydrochloride:

[1]. Arnt J, Bang-Andersen B, Grayson B, Lu AE58054, a 5-HT6 antagonist, reverses cognitive impairment induced by subchronic phencyclidine in a novel object recognition test in rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Sep;13(8):1021-33.

[2]. Witten L, Bang-Andersen B, Nielsen SM, Characterization of [?H]Lu AE60157 ([?H]8-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-3-phenylsulfonylquinoline) binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine? (5-HT?) receptors in vivo.Eur J Pharmacol. 2012 Feb 15;676(1-3):6-11.

 

Share
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: